不同敷料组合对烧伤患者供皮区创面微环境的影响

Objective To investigate the effect of dressing materials in various combinations on bum wound microenvironment and healing condition. Methods Two hundred donor sites with wounds of 0.3 mm in depth in 186 burn patients, who needed skingrafting and admitted to our ward were enrolled in study, and they were divided into A ( with dressing composed of aiginate + cotton pad for donor area), B ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + cotton pad for donor area) , C (with dressing composed of algi-nate+ foam dressing for donor area), D ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + foam dressing for donor area) groups according to random table method. Effect of dressings on wound evaporation and pH value were observed. Bacterial colonization, degree of pain complained by patients after dressing change, and wound healing time in each group were compared. Results One hundred and eighty-four patients complied with the study, while 2 patients were excluded due to untimely falling-off of the dressing. Wound evaporaton in respectively, among them B group showed optimal effect of keeping humidity (P<0.01). Wound pH value in A, B, C, D groups was 7.22±0.06, 7.41±0.03, 7.05±0.03, 7.34±0.06, respectively, among them it was highest in B group. The positive rate of bacteria in D group was highest (22.4%), and lowest in C group (4.0%). Pain was lightest in C group (score was 0.98±0.12), and most serious in B group ( score was 8.14±0.82). The shortest wound healing time was seen in C group (6.7±0.8 d) , and longest in D group (15.6±3.5 d). Conclusions Application of various dressings on similar wounds can pro-duce different wound microenvironment, which is closely related to wound healing time. Compared with pH value, humidity is the more important factor for wound healing.     

不同敷料组合对烧伤患者供皮区创面微环境的影响

Objective To investigate the effect of dressing materials in various combinations on bum wound microenvironment and healing condition. Methods Two hundred donor sites with wounds of 0.3 mm in depth in 186 burn patients, who needed skingrafting and admitted to our ward were enrolled in study, and they were divided into A ( with dressing composed of aiginate + cotton pad for donor area), B ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + cotton pad for donor area) , C (with dressing composed of algi-nate+ foam dressing for donor area), D ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + foam dressing for donor area) groups according to random table method. Effect of dressings on wound evaporation and pH value were observed. Bacterial colonization, degree of pain complained by patients after dressing change, and wound healing time in each group were compared. Results One hundred and eighty-four patients complied with the study, while 2 patients were excluded due to untimely falling-off of the dressing. Wound evaporaton in respectively, among them B group showed optimal effect of keeping humidity (P<0.01). Wound pH value in A, B, C, D groups was 7.22±0.06, 7.41±0.03, 7.05±0.03, 7.34±0.06, respectively, among them it was highest in B group. The positive rate of bacteria in D group was highest (22.4%), and lowest in C group (4.0%). Pain was lightest in C group (score was 0.98±0.12), and most serious in B group ( score was 8.14±0.82). The shortest wound healing time was seen in C group (6.7±0.8 d) , and longest in D group (15.6±3.5 d). Conclusions Application of various dressings on similar wounds can pro-duce different wound microenvironment, which is closely related to wound healing time. Compared with pH value, humidity is the more important factor for wound healing.     

不同敷料组合对烧伤患者供皮区创面微环境的影响

Objective To investigate the effect of dressing materials in various combinations on bum wound microenvironment and healing condition. Methods Two hundred donor sites with wounds of 0.3 mm in depth in 186 burn patients, who needed skingrafting and admitted to our ward were enrolled in study, and they were divided into A ( with dressing composed of aiginate + cotton pad for donor area), B ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + cotton pad for donor area) , C (with dressing composed of algi-nate+ foam dressing for donor area), D ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + foam dressing for donor area) groups according to random table method. Effect of dressings on wound evaporation and pH value were observed. Bacterial colonization, degree of pain complained by patients after dressing change, and wound healing time in each group were compared. Results One hundred and eighty-four patients complied with the study, while 2 patients were excluded due to untimely falling-off of the dressing. Wound evaporaton in respectively, among them B group showed optimal effect of keeping humidity (P<0.01). Wound pH value in A, B, C, D groups was 7.22±0.06, 7.41±0.03, 7.05±0.03, 7.34±0.06, respectively, among them it was highest in B group. The positive rate of bacteria in D group was highest (22.4%), and lowest in C group (4.0%). Pain was lightest in C group (score was 0.98±0.12), and most serious in B group ( score was 8.14±0.82). The shortest wound healing time was seen in C group (6.7±0.8 d) , and longest in D group (15.6±3.5 d). Conclusions Application of various dressings on similar wounds can pro-duce different wound microenvironment, which is closely related to wound healing time. Compared with pH value, humidity is the more important factor for wound healing.     

不同敷料组合对烧伤患者供皮区创面微环境的影响

Objective To investigate the effect of dressing materials in various combinations on bum wound microenvironment and healing condition. Methods Two hundred donor sites with wounds of 0.3 mm in depth in 186 burn patients, who needed skingrafting and admitted to our ward were enrolled in study, and they were divided into A ( with dressing composed of aiginate + cotton pad for donor area), B ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + cotton pad for donor area) , C (with dressing composed of algi-nate+ foam dressing for donor area), D ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + foam dressing for donor area) groups according to random table method. Effect of dressings on wound evaporation and pH value were observed. Bacterial colonization, degree of pain complained by patients after dressing change, and wound healing time in each group were compared. Results One hundred and eighty-four patients complied with the study, while 2 patients were excluded due to untimely falling-off of the dressing. Wound evaporaton in respectively, among them B group showed optimal effect of keeping humidity (P<0.01). Wound pH value in A, B, C, D groups was 7.22±0.06, 7.41±0.03, 7.05±0.03, 7.34±0.06, respectively, among them it was highest in B group. The positive rate of bacteria in D group was highest (22.4%), and lowest in C group (4.0%). Pain was lightest in C group (score was 0.98±0.12), and most serious in B group ( score was 8.14±0.82). The shortest wound healing time was seen in C group (6.7±0.8 d) , and longest in D group (15.6±3.5 d). Conclusions Application of various dressings on similar wounds can pro-duce different wound microenvironment, which is closely related to wound healing time. Compared with pH value, humidity is the more important factor for wound healing.     

不同敷料组合对烧伤患者供皮区创面微环境的影响

Objective To investigate the effect of dressing materials in various combinations on bum wound microenvironment and healing condition. Methods Two hundred donor sites with wounds of 0.3 mm in depth in 186 burn patients, who needed skingrafting and admitted to our ward were enrolled in study, and they were divided into A ( with dressing composed of aiginate + cotton pad for donor area), B ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + cotton pad for donor area) , C (with dressing composed of algi-nate+ foam dressing for donor area), D ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + foam dressing for donor area) groups according to random table method. Effect of dressings on wound evaporation and pH value were observed. Bacterial colonization, degree of pain complained by patients after dressing change, and wound healing time in each group were compared. Results One hundred and eighty-four patients complied with the study, while 2 patients were excluded due to untimely falling-off of the dressing. Wound evaporaton in respectively, among them B group showed optimal effect of keeping humidity (P<0.01). Wound pH value in A, B, C, D groups was 7.22±0.06, 7.41±0.03, 7.05±0.03, 7.34±0.06, respectively, among them it was highest in B group. The positive rate of bacteria in D group was highest (22.4%), and lowest in C group (4.0%). Pain was lightest in C group (score was 0.98±0.12), and most serious in B group ( score was 8.14±0.82). The shortest wound healing time was seen in C group (6.7±0.8 d) , and longest in D group (15.6±3.5 d). Conclusions Application of various dressings on similar wounds can pro-duce different wound microenvironment, which is closely related to wound healing time. Compared with pH value, humidity is the more important factor for wound healing.     

不同敷料组合对烧伤患者供皮区创面微环境的影响

Objective To investigate the effect of dressing materials in various combinations on bum wound microenvironment and healing condition. Methods Two hundred donor sites with wounds of 0.3 mm in depth in 186 burn patients, who needed skingrafting and admitted to our ward were enrolled in study, and they were divided into A ( with dressing composed of aiginate + cotton pad for donor area), B ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + cotton pad for donor area) , C (with dressing composed of algi-nate+ foam dressing for donor area), D ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + foam dressing for donor area) groups according to random table method. Effect of dressings on wound evaporation and pH value were observed. Bacterial colonization, degree of pain complained by patients after dressing change, and wound healing time in each group were compared. Results One hundred and eighty-four patients complied with the study, while 2 patients were excluded due to untimely falling-off of the dressing. Wound evaporaton in respectively, among them B group showed optimal effect of keeping humidity (P<0.01). Wound pH value in A, B, C, D groups was 7.22±0.06, 7.41±0.03, 7.05±0.03, 7.34±0.06, respectively, among them it was highest in B group. The positive rate of bacteria in D group was highest (22.4%), and lowest in C group (4.0%). Pain was lightest in C group (score was 0.98±0.12), and most serious in B group ( score was 8.14±0.82). The shortest wound healing time was seen in C group (6.7±0.8 d) , and longest in D group (15.6±3.5 d). Conclusions Application of various dressings on similar wounds can pro-duce different wound microenvironment, which is closely related to wound healing time. Compared with pH value, humidity is the more important factor for wound healing.     

不同敷料组合对烧伤患者供皮区创面微环境的影响

Objective To investigate the effect of dressing materials in various combinations on bum wound microenvironment and healing condition. Methods Two hundred donor sites with wounds of 0.3 mm in depth in 186 burn patients, who needed skingrafting and admitted to our ward were enrolled in study, and they were divided into A ( with dressing composed of aiginate + cotton pad for donor area), B ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + cotton pad for donor area) , C (with dressing composed of algi-nate+ foam dressing for donor area), D ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + foam dressing for donor area) groups according to random table method. Effect of dressings on wound evaporation and pH value were observed. Bacterial colonization, degree of pain complained by patients after dressing change, and wound healing time in each group were compared. Results One hundred and eighty-four patients complied with the study, while 2 patients were excluded due to untimely falling-off of the dressing. Wound evaporaton in respectively, among them B group showed optimal effect of keeping humidity (P<0.01). Wound pH value in A, B, C, D groups was 7.22±0.06, 7.41±0.03, 7.05±0.03, 7.34±0.06, respectively, among them it was highest in B group. The positive rate of bacteria in D group was highest (22.4%), and lowest in C group (4.0%). Pain was lightest in C group (score was 0.98±0.12), and most serious in B group ( score was 8.14±0.82). The shortest wound healing time was seen in C group (6.7±0.8 d) , and longest in D group (15.6±3.5 d). Conclusions Application of various dressings on similar wounds can pro-duce different wound microenvironment, which is closely related to wound healing time. Compared with pH value, humidity is the more important factor for wound healing.     

不同敷料组合对烧伤患者供皮区创面微环境的影响

Objective To investigate the effect of dressing materials in various combinations on bum wound microenvironment and healing condition. Methods Two hundred donor sites with wounds of 0.3 mm in depth in 186 burn patients, who needed skingrafting and admitted to our ward were enrolled in study, and they were divided into A ( with dressing composed of aiginate + cotton pad for donor area), B ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + cotton pad for donor area) , C (with dressing composed of algi-nate+ foam dressing for donor area), D ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + foam dressing for donor area) groups according to random table method. Effect of dressings on wound evaporation and pH value were observed. Bacterial colonization, degree of pain complained by patients after dressing change, and wound healing time in each group were compared. Results One hundred and eighty-four patients complied with the study, while 2 patients were excluded due to untimely falling-off of the dressing. Wound evaporaton in respectively, among them B group showed optimal effect of keeping humidity (P<0.01). Wound pH value in A, B, C, D groups was 7.22±0.06, 7.41±0.03, 7.05±0.03, 7.34±0.06, respectively, among them it was highest in B group. The positive rate of bacteria in D group was highest (22.4%), and lowest in C group (4.0%). Pain was lightest in C group (score was 0.98±0.12), and most serious in B group ( score was 8.14±0.82). The shortest wound healing time was seen in C group (6.7±0.8 d) , and longest in D group (15.6±3.5 d). Conclusions Application of various dressings on similar wounds can pro-duce different wound microenvironment, which is closely related to wound healing time. Compared with pH value, humidity is the more important factor for wound healing.     

不同敷料组合对烧伤患者供皮区创面微环境的影响

Objective To investigate the effect of dressing materials in various combinations on bum wound microenvironment and healing condition. Methods Two hundred donor sites with wounds of 0.3 mm in depth in 186 burn patients, who needed skingrafting and admitted to our ward were enrolled in study, and they were divided into A ( with dressing composed of aiginate + cotton pad for donor area), B ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + cotton pad for donor area) , C (with dressing composed of algi-nate+ foam dressing for donor area), D ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + foam dressing for donor area) groups according to random table method. Effect of dressings on wound evaporation and pH value were observed. Bacterial colonization, degree of pain complained by patients after dressing change, and wound healing time in each group were compared. Results One hundred and eighty-four patients complied with the study, while 2 patients were excluded due to untimely falling-off of the dressing. Wound evaporaton in respectively, among them B group showed optimal effect of keeping humidity (P<0.01). Wound pH value in A, B, C, D groups was 7.22±0.06, 7.41±0.03, 7.05±0.03, 7.34±0.06, respectively, among them it was highest in B group. The positive rate of bacteria in D group was highest (22.4%), and lowest in C group (4.0%). Pain was lightest in C group (score was 0.98±0.12), and most serious in B group ( score was 8.14±0.82). The shortest wound healing time was seen in C group (6.7±0.8 d) , and longest in D group (15.6±3.5 d). Conclusions Application of various dressings on similar wounds can pro-duce different wound microenvironment, which is closely related to wound healing time. Compared with pH value, humidity is the more important factor for wound healing.     

早期负压封闭引流治疗深Ⅱ度烧伤创面的临床疗效评价

Objective To evaluate the clinical curative effect of applying vaccum sealing drainage (VSD) therapy in treating deep partial-thickness burn wound at the initial stage prospectively, and to provide the basis for its clinical application. Methods Twenty-two patients with about 10% TBSA burn of the lower limbs, and in which partial-thickness wound exceeded 1% TBSA in each limb, were admitted to our hospital within 3 hours after burn from May 2009 to March 2010. Wounds in each patient were divided into VSD treatment group (treated with VSD therapy) and control group (treated with 10 g/L silver sulfadia-zine cream) based on the principles of symmetry of location, identical deepness, and similarity in size etc. The amount of water evaporation, the swelling intensity, the status of bacterial colonization, the degree of pain, the healing time, and the quality of healing of wounds in 2 groups were observed and compared. Data were processed with t test and rank-sum test. Results The observation was completed in 21 patients. All of the wounds were treated within 4 hours post burn (PBH). The amount of water evaporation of the normal skin and burn wounds before dressing coverage in VSD treatment group was respectively close to that in control group (with t value respectively 1.310, - 0. 911, P values all above 0.05) ; the amount of water evaporation on the surface of dressing in VSD treatment group [(44. 3 ±3.9) mL·h-1·m-2] was less than that in control group [(66.1 ±6.4) mL · h-1· m-2, t = -11.39, P <0.01]. In VSD treatment group, the circumference of proximal thigh increased (3.48 ±0.35) and (2.51 ±0.21) cm on post burn day (PBD) 3 , 7 as compared with that on PBH 5 , which was respectively smaller than that [(8.02 ± 0.41) , (3. 99 ± 0. 32) cm] in control group (with t value respectively 4. 110, 3. 569, P values all below 0. 01). Positive bacteria' culture rate on PBD 10 of each group was respectively lower than that at admission (with Z value respectively -3.220, -3.870, P values all below 0. 01) , and there was no significant statistical difference between 2 groups at admission or on PBD 10 (with Z value respectively - 0. 894, 0.000, P values all above 0.05). The wound surface in VSD treatment group was weak acidic (pH value 7. 12 ±0.06) on PBD 10,and it was neutral (pH value 7.41 ±0. 13) in control group. The wound pain degree in control group on PBD 1,3,7 was respectively higher than that in VSD treatment group (with t value respectively - 16. 132, -21.230, -16.453, P values all below 0.01). There was no significant statistical difference between 2 groups in healing time of wounds (t =1. 186, P >0.05). The healing quality of wounds in VSD treatment group (100. 00% , 100. 00%) 2 or 3 months after burn was better than that in control group (19. 05% , 85. 71%) (with Z value respectively -11.638, -3. 870, P values all below 0.01). Conclusions Early application of VSD therapy cannot expedite the healing process of deep partial-thickness burn wounds, but it can improve the healing quality. It is one of the effective methods to deal with deep partial-thickness burn wounds, which is worthy of clinical attention and further research.     

Importance of echocardiography in prognosis of surgical outcomes in cholecystitis in elderly patients

The authors propose to use more often echocardiography (EchoCG) in examination of elderly (over 60 years) of age patients with cholecystitis that permits to increase surgical activity to 92.4%. Left ventricular ejection fraction is the most informative. When this fraction is lower than 45% surgery must be recommended on vital indications only. EchoCG was used in 155 patients with cholecystitis, 131 of them were operated. 2 (1.52%) patients died due to acute cardio-vascular insufficiency and pulmonary artery thromboembolism.     

杭州健康女性定量骨超声测定原发性骨质疏松

目的 评价杭州健康女性骨超声速度(SOS)值随增龄减少和骨质疏松患病率，建立杭州地区女性骨超声速度值参考数据库。方法 定量超声法测定1208例杭州地区健康女性桡骨远端(RAD)，第3指骨近节(PLX)，第V跖骨(MTR)和胫骨中段(TIB)的超声速度值。结果 RAD、PLX、MTR和TIBSOS峰值(Peak of SOS)均出现在40-45岁，TJB的SOS峰值出现在35—40岁，此后随年龄增长而下降。绝经后妇女在绝经后早期和晚期各有1个SOS快速减少期，前见于桡骨近端，平均年减少率为2．4％，后见于胫骨中段，平均年减少率为1．8％。各部位骨SOS累积减少率随年龄增长而增加，到85岁4部位累积减少为13％-18％。60岁以后骨质疏松性症(OP)检出率为45％-70％，OP检出率以桡骨远端最高，60-70岁平均为67％，第3指骨近端次之约50％，胫骨中段最低为36％；75岁以后分别为70％，65％和45％。结论 全身各部位骨超声速度值到达峰值的年龄不同，峰值也各有差异。绝经后妇女骨超声速度值随年龄增加减少较快，应予激素和补钙治疗，桡骨远端为本地区SOS检测和OP检出的敏感部位。     

脊髓胶质细胞在小鼠骨癌痛形成中的作用

Objective To evaluate the role of gliocyte in the spinal cord in the development of bone cancer pain (BCP) in mice. Methods Forty male C3H/He mice aged 8-10 weeks weighing 18-22 g were randomly divided into 4 groups ( n = 10 each) : group I sham operation (group S) , group II BCP, group Ⅲ PBS and group IV minocyline (group M) . In group BCP, PBS and M, bone cancer pain was produced by injection of NCTC2472 fibrosarcoma cell suspension (2 x 105 cells) 10 μl into medullary cavity of calcaneus bone, while in group S, PBS solution 10 μl was injected instead of cancer cell suspension. In group PBS and M, PBS 5 μl and minocyline 5 μl (dissolved to 0.2 mmol/L in PBS)_were given IT immediately before cancer cell inoculation once a day for 11 consecutive days respectively. Mechanical pain threshold was measured at 1 d before cancer cell inoculation, and at 0, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11d after cancer cell inoculation. Cold pain threshold was measured at 3, 7, 9 and 11d after cancer cell inoculation. The animals were killed after measurement of pain threshold and L4-6, segment of spinal cord was removed for determination of GFAP and CD11b expression by Western blot. Results Compared with group S, mechanical pain threshold was significantly increased at 3-11 d after cancer cell inoculation in group BCP and PBS, and at 3 and S d after cancer cell inoculation in group M, and cold pain threshold was significantly increased at 7-11 d after cancer cell inoculation, and expression of CD11b and GFAP was up-regulated in group BCP, PBS and M ( P < 0.05) . Compared with group BCP, mechanical pain threshold was significantly decreased at 3-11 d after cancer cell inoculation, cold pain threshold was significantly decreased at 7-11 d after cancer cell inoculation, and expression of CD11b and GFAP was down-regulated in group M ( P <0.05) . ConclusionThe activiton of gliocyte in the spinal cord is involved in the development of bone cancer pian in mice.     

中脑导水管周围灰质小胶质细胞活化在大鼠神经病理性痛中的作用

目的 评价中脑导水管周围灰质小胶质细胞活化在大鼠神经病理性痛中的作用.方法 雄性SD大鼠176只,体重200 ～ 250 g,9周龄,采用随机数字法,将其分为4组:假手术组(S组,n=40)、神经病理性痛组(NP组,n=40)、生理盐水组(NS组,n=48)和米诺环素组(M组,n=48).NP组、NS组和M组采用慢性坐骨神经缩窄性损伤法制备大鼠神经病理性痛模型;S组仅暴露坐骨神经,而不结扎.术后第7天时,NS组和M组分别于中脑导水管周围灰质的腹外侧区注射生理盐水或米诺环素0.5μl.取8只大鼠,分别于术前1 d(T0)、术后第3天(T1)、第7天给药前30 min(T2)、第7天给药后30 min(T3)、第14天(T4)和第21天(T5)时测定机械痛阈.于T1-5时各处死8只大鼠,取脑组织,行小胶质细胞计数.结果 与S组比较,NP组、NS组和M组T1-5时机械痛阈降低,小胶质细胞计数升高(P＜0.05);NP组和NS组各时点机械痛阈和小胶质细胞计数差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);与NP组和NS组比较,M组T3时机械痛阈升高,小胶质细胞计数降低(P＜0.05).结论 中脑导水管周围灰质小胶质细胞的活化参与了大鼠神经病理性痛中的形成与维持.     

沈阳男性髋部骨折多于女性原因探讨

为找出沈阳地区髋部骨折发生男性多于女性的原因，探索该病在不发达国家或地区的流行特点，我们再次通过查阅病例记录，对沈阳市１９９４年５０岁以上人口的部分髋部骨折病发生的原因进行了较详细的调查分析。共调查分析２６６髋部骨折病例，其中男１６３例，女１０３例。损伤原因记为单纯摔倒（滑倒或绊倒）、骑自行车摔倒、自行车撞倒、机动车事故和高位跌下（滚楼梯或从较高位置掉下）。结果表明：男女在髋部骨折伤因构成上有差别（Ｐ＝０．００４）。女性髋部骨折的大多数（７０％）是由单纯摔倒引起，而在男性则不足一半（４９％），即男性髋部骨折的一半以上不是由于单纯摔倒而是由各种意外事故造成的（Ｐ＝０．０００８）。在各种意外事故中，男性骑自行车摔倒引起骨折的频率（２８％）明显高于女性（１０％）。除了骑自行车摔倒外，男性由自行车撞倒和高位跌下引起骨折的频率稍高于女性，但无太大差别。机动车事故造成骨折的频率男女基本一致。此结果在一定的程度上说明，１９９４年沈阳５０岁以上的男性髋部骨折发病率高是由于男性发生的各种意外事故多，尤其是骑自行车引起的事故造成的。     

脊髓胶质细胞在小鼠骨癌痛形成中的作用

Objective To evaluate the role of gliocyte in the spinal cord in the development of bone cancer pain (BCP) in mice. Methods Forty male C3H/He mice aged 8-10 weeks weighing 18-22 g were randomly divided into 4 groups ( n = 10 each) : group I sham operation (group S) , group II BCP, group Ⅲ PBS and group IV minocyline (group M) . In group BCP, PBS and M, bone cancer pain was produced by injection of NCTC2472 fibrosarcoma cell suspension (2 x 105 cells) 10 μl into medullary cavity of calcaneus bone, while in group S, PBS solution 10 μl was injected instead of cancer cell suspension. In group PBS and M, PBS 5 μl and minocyline 5 μl (dissolved to 0.2 mmol/L in PBS)_were given IT immediately before cancer cell inoculation once a day for 11 consecutive days respectively. Mechanical pain threshold was measured at 1 d before cancer cell inoculation, and at 0, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11d after cancer cell inoculation. Cold pain threshold was measured at 3, 7, 9 and 11d after cancer cell inoculation. The animals were killed after measurement of pain threshold and L4-6, segment of spinal cord was removed for determination of GFAP and CD11b expression by Western blot. Results Compared with group S, mechanical pain threshold was significantly increased at 3-11 d after cancer cell inoculation in group BCP and PBS, and at 3 and S d after cancer cell inoculation in group M, and cold pain threshold was significantly increased at 7-11 d after cancer cell inoculation, and expression of CD11b and GFAP was up-regulated in group BCP, PBS and M ( P < 0.05) . Compared with group BCP, mechanical pain threshold was significantly decreased at 3-11 d after cancer cell inoculation, cold pain threshold was significantly decreased at 7-11 d after cancer cell inoculation, and expression of CD11b and GFAP was down-regulated in group M ( P <0.05) . ConclusionThe activiton of gliocyte in the spinal cord is involved in the development of bone cancer pian in mice.     

脊髓胶质细胞在大鼠炎性痛形成中的作用

目的 评价脊髓胶质细胞在大鼠炎性痛形成中的作用.方法 清洁Ⅱ级成年雄性SD大鼠,体重180～220 g,取蛛网膜下腔置管成功的大鼠65只,随机分为5组(n=13),生理盐水组(NS组):右后肢踝关节外侧皮下注射NS 50μl;炎性痛组(IP组):采用右后肢踝关节外侧皮下注射完全弗氏佐剂50μl的方法制备炎性痛模型;氟代柠檬酸组(FC组):经蛛网膜下腔导管注射FC 1 nmol/10 μl,15 min后右后肢踝关节外侧皮下注射NS 50 μl;NS+IP组:经蛛网膜下腔导管注射NS 10 μl,15 min后制备炎性痛模型;FC+IP组:经蛛网膜下腔导管注射FC 1 nmol/10 μ,15 min后制备炎性痛模型.于模型制备前2 d(T_0)、皮下注射药物前(T_1)和注射药物后2、4、6、8、10、12、24、26 h(T_(2～9))时测定机械缩足阈值(MWT)和热缩足潜伏期(TWL).皮下注射药物后8 h时采用免疫组化法测定脊髓背角星形胶质细胞标记物(GFAP)和小胶质细胞标记物(OX-42)的表达水平.结果 与NS组比较,IP组和NS+IP组T_(3～9)时MWT和TWL降低,FC+IP组T_(3～9)时MWT降低,T_(8,9)时TWL降低,IP组、NS+EP组和FC+EP组脊髓GFAP和OX-42的表达水平均上调(P<0.05);与IP组比较,FC组T_(3～9)时MWT和TWL升高,FC+IP组T_(3～7)时MWT和TWL升高,2组脊髓GFAP和OX-42的表达水平均下调(P<0.05或0.01).结论 脊髓胶质细胞的活化参与了大鼠炎性痛的形成.