早期负压封闭引流治疗深Ⅱ度烧伤创面的临床疗效评价

Objective To evaluate the clinical curative effect of applying vaccum sealing drainage (VSD) therapy in treating deep partial-thickness burn wound at the initial stage prospectively, and to provide the basis for its clinical application. Methods Twenty-two patients with about 10% TBSA burn of the lower limbs, and in which partial-thickness wound exceeded 1% TBSA in each limb, were admitted to our hospital within 3 hours after burn from May 2009 to March 2010. Wounds in each patient were divided into VSD treatment group (treated with VSD therapy) and control group (treated with 10 g/L silver sulfadia-zine cream) based on the principles of symmetry of location, identical deepness, and similarity in size etc. The amount of water evaporation, the swelling intensity, the status of bacterial colonization, the degree of pain, the healing time, and the quality of healing of wounds in 2 groups were observed and compared. Data were processed with t test and rank-sum test. Results The observation was completed in 21 patients. All of the wounds were treated within 4 hours post burn (PBH). The amount of water evaporation of the normal skin and burn wounds before dressing coverage in VSD treatment group was respectively close to that in control group (with t value respectively 1.310, - 0. 911, P values all above 0.05) ; the amount of water evaporation on the surface of dressing in VSD treatment group [(44. 3 ±3.9) mL·h-1·m-2] was less than that in control group [(66.1 ±6.4) mL · h-1· m-2, t = -11.39, P <0.01]. In VSD treatment group, the circumference of proximal thigh increased (3.48 ±0.35) and (2.51 ±0.21) cm on post burn day (PBD) 3 , 7 as compared with that on PBH 5 , which was respectively smaller than that [(8.02 ± 0.41) , (3. 99 ± 0. 32) cm] in control group (with t value respectively 4. 110, 3. 569, P values all below 0. 01). Positive bacteria' culture rate on PBD 10 of each group was respectively lower than that at admission (with Z value respectively -3.220, -3.870, P values all below 0. 01) , and there was no significant statistical difference between 2 groups at admission or on PBD 10 (with Z value respectively - 0. 894, 0.000, P values all above 0.05). The wound surface in VSD treatment group was weak acidic (pH value 7. 12 ±0.06) on PBD 10,and it was neutral (pH value 7.41 ±0. 13) in control group. The wound pain degree in control group on PBD 1,3,7 was respectively higher than that in VSD treatment group (with t value respectively - 16. 132, -21.230, -16.453, P values all below 0.01). There was no significant statistical difference between 2 groups in healing time of wounds (t =1. 186, P >0.05). The healing quality of wounds in VSD treatment group (100. 00% , 100. 00%) 2 or 3 months after burn was better than that in control group (19. 05% , 85. 71%) (with Z value respectively -11.638, -3. 870, P values all below 0.01). Conclusions Early application of VSD therapy cannot expedite the healing process of deep partial-thickness burn wounds, but it can improve the healing quality. It is one of the effective methods to deal with deep partial-thickness burn wounds, which is worthy of clinical attention and further research.     

大鼠烫伤创面感染模型的研制

Objective To reproduce a reliable rat model of burn with infection for the study of prevention and treatment of infected wound. Methods ( 1 ) Electrical burn producing apparatus equipped with constant temperature (80 ℃ ) and pressure (0.5 kg) was used to reproduce burn injury (with area of 4.5 cm2 ) on both sides of the back in 50 SD rats for different duration (4, 6, 8, 10, 12 s) , with 10 rats for each burn duration. On post burn day (PBD) 1, gross condition of wounds was observed with naked eyes.Wounds on the left side were used to observe healing time. The wounds on the right side were used for histological observation to determine the depth of injury, and they were classified into superficial and deep partialthickness injury. (2) Another 36 SD rats were divided into A (inflicted with superficial partial-thickness burn, n = 18) and B (inflicted with deep partial-thickness burn, n = 18) groups according to the random number table. Rats in both groups were treated in accordance with method of preliminary experiment. Immediately after burn, 0. 1 mL of liquid containing 1 × 109, 1 × 107, 1 × 105 CFU Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) ATCC 27853 was respectively inoculated to the wounds on one side (with 6 rats for each amount) ,while the wounds on the other side were treated with the same volume of normal saline as control. Inflammatory reaction of wounds was examined with HE staining on post inoculation day (PID) 1. On PID 1, 2, 3,5, 7, and 14, the number of subeschar bacteria was respectively counted and the bacteria were identified with Gram stain and biochemical reaction. Wound healing time was recorded. Data were processed with t test. Results (1) Burn for 6, 8 s was respectively identified as injury time resulting in superficial or deep partial-thickness injury according to histological observation and wound healing time. (2) Obvious inflammatory cell infiltration was observed in the wounds in B group which were inoculated with 1 × 107 , 1 ×109 CFU PA, and the infiltration was less marked in A group with inoculation of 1 × 109 CFU PA. (3) The bacteria isolated from wounds of A and B groups was identified as PA. The subeschar bacteria count within PID 14 in A group, in which different amount of PA was inoculated, was mostly less than 1 × 105 CFU/g of tissue, while that in B group in which 1 × 109 CFU PA was inoculated was more than 1 × 105 CFU/g of tissue. (4) There was no obvious difference in wound healing time between wounds inoculated with different amount of PA and wounds treated with normal saline in A group ( with t value respectively 1.26, 0. 29, 1.07,P values all above 0.05 ). Wound healing time of wounds in B group, in which 1 × 109 CFU PA was inoculated, was longer as compared with that treated with normal saline [(22.5 + 1.0) d vs. ( 19.4 + 1.6) d, t =2.73, P ＜0. 05]. Conclusions In rat, deep partial-thickness burn wound inoculated with 1 × 109 CFU PA ATCC 27853 is a reliable model with high reproducibility for the study of infection of burn wound.     

大鼠烫伤创面感染模型的研制

Objective To reproduce a reliable rat model of burn with infection for the study of prevention and treatment of infected wound. Methods ( 1 ) Electrical burn producing apparatus equipped with constant temperature (80 ℃ ) and pressure (0.5 kg) was used to reproduce burn injury (with area of 4.5 cm2 ) on both sides of the back in 50 SD rats for different duration (4, 6, 8, 10, 12 s) , with 10 rats for each burn duration. On post burn day (PBD) 1, gross condition of wounds was observed with naked eyes.Wounds on the left side were used to observe healing time. The wounds on the right side were used for histological observation to determine the depth of injury, and they were classified into superficial and deep partialthickness injury. (2) Another 36 SD rats were divided into A (inflicted with superficial partial-thickness burn, n = 18) and B (inflicted with deep partial-thickness burn, n = 18) groups according to the random number table. Rats in both groups were treated in accordance with method of preliminary experiment. Immediately after burn, 0. 1 mL of liquid containing 1 × 109, 1 × 107, 1 × 105 CFU Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) ATCC 27853 was respectively inoculated to the wounds on one side (with 6 rats for each amount) ,while the wounds on the other side were treated with the same volume of normal saline as control. Inflammatory reaction of wounds was examined with HE staining on post inoculation day (PID) 1. On PID 1, 2, 3,5, 7, and 14, the number of subeschar bacteria was respectively counted and the bacteria were identified with Gram stain and biochemical reaction. Wound healing time was recorded. Data were processed with t test. Results (1) Burn for 6, 8 s was respectively identified as injury time resulting in superficial or deep partial-thickness injury according to histological observation and wound healing time. (2) Obvious inflammatory cell infiltration was observed in the wounds in B group which were inoculated with 1 × 107 , 1 ×109 CFU PA, and the infiltration was less marked in A group with inoculation of 1 × 109 CFU PA. (3) The bacteria isolated from wounds of A and B groups was identified as PA. The subeschar bacteria count within PID 14 in A group, in which different amount of PA was inoculated, was mostly less than 1 × 105 CFU/g of tissue, while that in B group in which 1 × 109 CFU PA was inoculated was more than 1 × 105 CFU/g of tissue. (4) There was no obvious difference in wound healing time between wounds inoculated with different amount of PA and wounds treated with normal saline in A group ( with t value respectively 1.26, 0. 29, 1.07,P values all above 0.05 ). Wound healing time of wounds in B group, in which 1 × 109 CFU PA was inoculated, was longer as compared with that treated with normal saline [(22.5 + 1.0) d vs. ( 19.4 + 1.6) d, t =2.73, P ＜0. 05]. Conclusions In rat, deep partial-thickness burn wound inoculated with 1 × 109 CFU PA ATCC 27853 is a reliable model with high reproducibility for the study of infection of burn wound.     

不同敷料组合对烧伤患者供皮区创面微环境的影响

Objective To investigate the effect of dressing materials in various combinations on bum wound microenvironment and healing condition. Methods Two hundred donor sites with wounds of 0.3 mm in depth in 186 burn patients, who needed skingrafting and admitted to our ward were enrolled in study, and they were divided into A ( with dressing composed of aiginate + cotton pad for donor area), B ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + cotton pad for donor area) , C (with dressing composed of algi-nate+ foam dressing for donor area), D ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + foam dressing for donor area) groups according to random table method. Effect of dressings on wound evaporation and pH value were observed. Bacterial colonization, degree of pain complained by patients after dressing change, and wound healing time in each group were compared. Results One hundred and eighty-four patients complied with the study, while 2 patients were excluded due to untimely falling-off of the dressing. Wound evaporaton in respectively, among them B group showed optimal effect of keeping humidity (P<0.01). Wound pH value in A, B, C, D groups was 7.22±0.06, 7.41±0.03, 7.05±0.03, 7.34±0.06, respectively, among them it was highest in B group. The positive rate of bacteria in D group was highest (22.4%), and lowest in C group (4.0%). Pain was lightest in C group (score was 0.98±0.12), and most serious in B group ( score was 8.14±0.82). The shortest wound healing time was seen in C group (6.7±0.8 d) , and longest in D group (15.6±3.5 d). Conclusions Application of various dressings on similar wounds can pro-duce different wound microenvironment, which is closely related to wound healing time. Compared with pH value, humidity is the more important factor for wound healing.     

不同敷料组合对烧伤患者供皮区创面微环境的影响

Objective To investigate the effect of dressing materials in various combinations on bum wound microenvironment and healing condition. Methods Two hundred donor sites with wounds of 0.3 mm in depth in 186 burn patients, who needed skingrafting and admitted to our ward were enrolled in study, and they were divided into A ( with dressing composed of aiginate + cotton pad for donor area), B ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + cotton pad for donor area) , C (with dressing composed of algi-nate+ foam dressing for donor area), D ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + foam dressing for donor area) groups according to random table method. Effect of dressings on wound evaporation and pH value were observed. Bacterial colonization, degree of pain complained by patients after dressing change, and wound healing time in each group were compared. Results One hundred and eighty-four patients complied with the study, while 2 patients were excluded due to untimely falling-off of the dressing. Wound evaporaton in respectively, among them B group showed optimal effect of keeping humidity (P<0.01). Wound pH value in A, B, C, D groups was 7.22±0.06, 7.41±0.03, 7.05±0.03, 7.34±0.06, respectively, among them it was highest in B group. The positive rate of bacteria in D group was highest (22.4%), and lowest in C group (4.0%). Pain was lightest in C group (score was 0.98±0.12), and most serious in B group ( score was 8.14±0.82). The shortest wound healing time was seen in C group (6.7±0.8 d) , and longest in D group (15.6±3.5 d). Conclusions Application of various dressings on similar wounds can pro-duce different wound microenvironment, which is closely related to wound healing time. Compared with pH value, humidity is the more important factor for wound healing.     

不同敷料组合对烧伤患者供皮区创面微环境的影响

Objective To investigate the effect of dressing materials in various combinations on bum wound microenvironment and healing condition. Methods Two hundred donor sites with wounds of 0.3 mm in depth in 186 burn patients, who needed skingrafting and admitted to our ward were enrolled in study, and they were divided into A ( with dressing composed of aiginate + cotton pad for donor area), B ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + cotton pad for donor area) , C (with dressing composed of algi-nate+ foam dressing for donor area), D ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + foam dressing for donor area) groups according to random table method. Effect of dressings on wound evaporation and pH value were observed. Bacterial colonization, degree of pain complained by patients after dressing change, and wound healing time in each group were compared. Results One hundred and eighty-four patients complied with the study, while 2 patients were excluded due to untimely falling-off of the dressing. Wound evaporaton in respectively, among them B group showed optimal effect of keeping humidity (P<0.01). Wound pH value in A, B, C, D groups was 7.22±0.06, 7.41±0.03, 7.05±0.03, 7.34±0.06, respectively, among them it was highest in B group. The positive rate of bacteria in D group was highest (22.4%), and lowest in C group (4.0%). Pain was lightest in C group (score was 0.98±0.12), and most serious in B group ( score was 8.14±0.82). The shortest wound healing time was seen in C group (6.7±0.8 d) , and longest in D group (15.6±3.5 d). Conclusions Application of various dressings on similar wounds can pro-duce different wound microenvironment, which is closely related to wound healing time. Compared with pH value, humidity is the more important factor for wound healing.     

不同敷料组合对烧伤患者供皮区创面微环境的影响

Objective To investigate the effect of dressing materials in various combinations on bum wound microenvironment and healing condition. Methods Two hundred donor sites with wounds of 0.3 mm in depth in 186 burn patients, who needed skingrafting and admitted to our ward were enrolled in study, and they were divided into A ( with dressing composed of aiginate + cotton pad for donor area), B ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + cotton pad for donor area) , C (with dressing composed of algi-nate+ foam dressing for donor area), D ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + foam dressing for donor area) groups according to random table method. Effect of dressings on wound evaporation and pH value were observed. Bacterial colonization, degree of pain complained by patients after dressing change, and wound healing time in each group were compared. Results One hundred and eighty-four patients complied with the study, while 2 patients were excluded due to untimely falling-off of the dressing. Wound evaporaton in respectively, among them B group showed optimal effect of keeping humidity (P<0.01). Wound pH value in A, B, C, D groups was 7.22±0.06, 7.41±0.03, 7.05±0.03, 7.34±0.06, respectively, among them it was highest in B group. The positive rate of bacteria in D group was highest (22.4%), and lowest in C group (4.0%). Pain was lightest in C group (score was 0.98±0.12), and most serious in B group ( score was 8.14±0.82). The shortest wound healing time was seen in C group (6.7±0.8 d) , and longest in D group (15.6±3.5 d). Conclusions Application of various dressings on similar wounds can pro-duce different wound microenvironment, which is closely related to wound healing time. Compared with pH value, humidity is the more important factor for wound healing.     

不同敷料组合对烧伤患者供皮区创面微环境的影响

Objective To investigate the effect of dressing materials in various combinations on bum wound microenvironment and healing condition. Methods Two hundred donor sites with wounds of 0.3 mm in depth in 186 burn patients, who needed skingrafting and admitted to our ward were enrolled in study, and they were divided into A ( with dressing composed of aiginate + cotton pad for donor area), B ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + cotton pad for donor area) , C (with dressing composed of algi-nate+ foam dressing for donor area), D ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + foam dressing for donor area) groups according to random table method. Effect of dressings on wound evaporation and pH value were observed. Bacterial colonization, degree of pain complained by patients after dressing change, and wound healing time in each group were compared. Results One hundred and eighty-four patients complied with the study, while 2 patients were excluded due to untimely falling-off of the dressing. Wound evaporaton in respectively, among them B group showed optimal effect of keeping humidity (P<0.01). Wound pH value in A, B, C, D groups was 7.22±0.06, 7.41±0.03, 7.05±0.03, 7.34±0.06, respectively, among them it was highest in B group. The positive rate of bacteria in D group was highest (22.4%), and lowest in C group (4.0%). Pain was lightest in C group (score was 0.98±0.12), and most serious in B group ( score was 8.14±0.82). The shortest wound healing time was seen in C group (6.7±0.8 d) , and longest in D group (15.6±3.5 d). Conclusions Application of various dressings on similar wounds can pro-duce different wound microenvironment, which is closely related to wound healing time. Compared with pH value, humidity is the more important factor for wound healing.     

不同敷料组合对烧伤患者供皮区创面微环境的影响

Objective To investigate the effect of dressing materials in various combinations on bum wound microenvironment and healing condition. Methods Two hundred donor sites with wounds of 0.3 mm in depth in 186 burn patients, who needed skingrafting and admitted to our ward were enrolled in study, and they were divided into A ( with dressing composed of aiginate + cotton pad for donor area), B ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + cotton pad for donor area) , C (with dressing composed of algi-nate+ foam dressing for donor area), D ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + foam dressing for donor area) groups according to random table method. Effect of dressings on wound evaporation and pH value were observed. Bacterial colonization, degree of pain complained by patients after dressing change, and wound healing time in each group were compared. Results One hundred and eighty-four patients complied with the study, while 2 patients were excluded due to untimely falling-off of the dressing. Wound evaporaton in respectively, among them B group showed optimal effect of keeping humidity (P<0.01). Wound pH value in A, B, C, D groups was 7.22±0.06, 7.41±0.03, 7.05±0.03, 7.34±0.06, respectively, among them it was highest in B group. The positive rate of bacteria in D group was highest (22.4%), and lowest in C group (4.0%). Pain was lightest in C group (score was 0.98±0.12), and most serious in B group ( score was 8.14±0.82). The shortest wound healing time was seen in C group (6.7±0.8 d) , and longest in D group (15.6±3.5 d). Conclusions Application of various dressings on similar wounds can pro-duce different wound microenvironment, which is closely related to wound healing time. Compared with pH value, humidity is the more important factor for wound healing.     

不同敷料组合对烧伤患者供皮区创面微环境的影响

Objective To investigate the effect of dressing materials in various combinations on bum wound microenvironment and healing condition. Methods Two hundred donor sites with wounds of 0.3 mm in depth in 186 burn patients, who needed skingrafting and admitted to our ward were enrolled in study, and they were divided into A ( with dressing composed of aiginate + cotton pad for donor area), B ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + cotton pad for donor area) , C (with dressing composed of algi-nate+ foam dressing for donor area), D ( with dressing composed of vaseline gauze + foam dressing for donor area) groups according to random table method. Effect of dressings on wound evaporation and pH value were observed. Bacterial colonization, degree of pain complained by patients after dressing change, and wound healing time in each group were compared. Results One hundred and eighty-four patients complied with the study, while 2 patients were excluded due to untimely falling-off of the dressing. Wound evaporaton in respectively, among them B group showed optimal effect of keeping humidity (P<0.01). Wound pH value in A, B, C, D groups was 7.22±0.06, 7.41±0.03, 7.05±0.03, 7.34±0.06, respectively, among them it was highest in B group. The positive rate of bacteria in D group was highest (22.4%), and lowest in C group (4.0%). Pain was lightest in C group (score was 0.98±0.12), and most serious in B group ( score was 8.14±0.82). The shortest wound healing time was seen in C group (6.7±0.8 d) , and longest in D group (15.6±3.5 d). Conclusions Application of various dressings on similar wounds can pro-duce different wound microenvironment, which is closely related to wound healing time. Compared with pH value, humidity is the more important factor for wound healing.     

胸腰椎骨折椎弓根内固定断裂与植骨融合方式的相关性分析

[目的]探讨胸腰椎骨折椎弓根螺钉内固定系统内固定术后,椎弓根螺钉断裂与植骨融合方式之间的关系,以探讨胸腰椎骨折植骨融合的最佳方式。[方法]回顾性研究1995年5月~2005年12月本院脊柱外科收治的胸腰椎骨折病人197例,其中A组单纯内固定(不植骨)患者14例,B组“H”形椎板植骨21例,C组横突间植骨67例,D组椎间、椎内联合横突间植骨95例。[结果]术后随访6~32个月,内固定断裂12例,其中A组4例,B组3例,C组5例,D组0例,4组中D组内固定断裂率显著低于其他3组(P<0.05)。[结论]椎间、椎体内联合横突间植骨重建脊柱三柱的稳定性,符合人体生物力学原理,能有效降低内固定断裂的发生。     

Influence of the design of the prosthesis on the outcome after hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder in displaced fractures of the head of the humerus

We reviewed 39 patients with displaced three- and four-part fractures of the humerus. In 21 patients (group A) we had used an anatomical prosthesis for the humeral head and in 18 (group B) an implant designed for fractures. When followed up at a mean of 29.3 months after surgery the overall Constant score was 51.9 points; in group A it was 51.5 and in group B 52.4 points. The subjective satisfaction of the patients was assessed using a numerical rating scale and was similar in both groups. In group A complete healing of the tuberosities was found in 29% and 50% in group B. Partial integration was seen in 29% of group A and in only one patient in group B, while resorption was noted in 43% of group A and 44% of group B. The functional outcome was significantly better in patients with complete or partial healing of the tuberosities (p=0.022). The specific trauma prosthesis did not lead to better healing of the tuberosities. The difference in clinical outcome obtained by the two designs did not reach statistical significance.