Denitrification,dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium,and nitrogen fixation along a nitrate concentration gradient in a created freshwater wetland

Wetlands are often highly effective nitrogen (N) sinks. In the Lake Waco Wetland (LWW), near Waco, Texas, USA, nitrate (NO₃⁻) concentrations are reduced by more than 90% in the first 500 m downstream of the inflow, creating a distinct gradient in NO₃⁻ concentration along the flow path of water. The relative importance of sediment denitrification (DNF), dissimilatory NO₃⁻ reduction to ammonium (DNRA), and N₂ fixation were examined along the NO₃⁻ concentration gradient in the LWW. “Potential DNF” (hereafter potDNF) was observed in all months and ranged from 54 to 278 μmol N m⁻² h⁻¹. “Potential DNRA” (hereafter potDNRA) was observed only in summer months and ranged from 1.3 to 33 μmol N m⁻² h⁻¹. Net N₂ flux ranged from 184 (net denitrification) to −270 (net N₂ fixation) μmol N m⁻² h⁻¹. Nitrogen fixation was variable, ranging from 0 to 426 μmol N m⁻² h⁻¹, but high rates ranked among the highest reported for aquatic sediments. On average, summer potDNRA comprised only 5% (±2% SE) of total NO₃⁻ loss through dissimilatory pathways, but was as high as 36% at one site where potDNF was consistently low. Potential DNRA was higher in sediments with higher sediment oxygen demand (r ² = 0.84), and was related to NO₃⁻ concentration in overlying water in one summer (r ² = 0.81). Sediments were a NO₃⁻ sink and accounted for 50% of wetland NO₃⁻ removal (r ² = 0.90). Sediments were an NH₄⁺ source, but the wetland was often a net NH₄⁺ sink. Although DNRA rates in freshwater wetlands may rival those observed in estuarine systems, the importance of DNRA in freshwater sediments appears to be minor relative to DNF. Furthermore, sediment N₂ fixation can be extremely high when NO₃⁻ in overlying water is consistently low. The data suggest that newly fixed N can support sustained N transformation processes such as DNF and DNRA when surface water inorganic N supply rates are low.     

Cd1-型亚硝酸盐还原酶脱氮工程菌的构建与表达

目的用基因工程技术将铜绿假单胞菌PAO1中nirS基因定向克隆至表达载体pQE-30上,使nirS基因得到高效表达。方法根据GenBank公布的nirS碱基序列和表达载体pQE-30的多克隆位点设计引物,以铜绿假单胞菌PAO1的基因组DNA为模板,应用PCR技术扩增目的片段nirS;之后经过BamH I和HindⅢ双酶切,定向克隆到pQE-30上,化学转化DH5α,构建含有重组质粒的转化子pQE30-nirS-DH5α;经酶切和测序鉴定,扩增产物的碱基序列与GenBank公布的序列完全吻合,再将重组质粒pQE30-nirS转化表达菌株SG13009构建脱氮基因工程菌pQE30-nirS-SG-13009（PNS）。最后用SDS-PAGE（IPTG浓度：0．05mmol／L;诱导温度：25℃;诱导时间：2～3h）和His-tag in-gel Stain鉴定cd1-型亚硝酸盐还原酶的分子量与特异性。结果构建了高效表达cd1-型亚硝酸盐还原酶的脱氮基因工程菌PNS。结论Cd1-型亚硝酸盐还原酶能够在脱氮基因工程菌PNS中得到正确和高效的表达。     

Soils,a sink for N2O? A review

Soils are the main sources of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N₂O). The N₂O emission at the soil surface is the result of production and consumption processes. So far, research has concentrated on net N₂O production. However, in the literature, there are numerous reports of net negative fluxes of N₂O, (i.e. fluxes from the atmosphere to the soil). Such fluxes are frequent and substantial and cannot simply be dismissed as experimental noise.
Net N₂O consumption has been measured under various conditions from the tropics to temperate areas, in natural and agricultural systems. Low mineral N and large moisture contents have sometimes been found to favour N₂O consumption. This fits in with denitrification as the responsible process, reducing N₂O to N₂. However, it has also been reported that nitrifiers consume N₂O in nitrifier denitrification. A contribution of various processes could explain the wide range of conditions found to allow N₂O consumption, ranging from low to high temperatures, wet to dry soils, and fertilized to unfertilized plots. Generally, conditions interfering with N₂O diffusion in the soil seem to enhance N₂O consumption. However, the factors regulating N₂O consumption are not yet well understood and merit further study.
Frequent literature reports of net N₂O consumption suggest that a soil sink could help account for the current imbalance in estimated global budgets of N₂O. Therefore, a systematic investigation into N₂O consumption is necessary. This should concentrate on the organisms, reactions, and environmental factors involved.     

Comparison of measured and EF5-r-derived N2O fluxes from a spring-fed river

There is considerable uncertainty in the estimates of indirect N₂O emissions as defined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) methodology. Direct measurements of N₂O yields and fluxes in aquatic river environments are sparse and more data are required to determine the role that rivers play in the global N₂O budget. The objectives of this research were to measure the N₂O fluxes from a spring‐fed river, relate these fluxes to the dissolved N₂O concentrations and NO₃‐N loading of the river, and to try to define the indirect emission factor (EF5‐r) for the river. Gas bubble ebullition was observed at the river source with bubbles containing 7.9 μL N₂O L^?1. River NO₃‐N and dissolved N₂O concentrations ranged from 2.5 to 5.3 mg L^?1 and 0.4 to 1.9 μg N₂O‐N L^?1, respectively, with N₂O saturation reaching 404%. Floating headspace chambers were used to sample N₂O fluxes. N₂O‐N fluxes were significantly related to dissolved N₂O‐N concentrations (r²=0.31) but not to NO₃‐N concentrations. The N₂O‐N fluxes ranged from 38 to 501 μg m^?2 h^?1, averaging 171 μg m^?2 h^?1 (±SD 85) overall. The measured N₂O‐N fluxes equated to an EF5‐r of only 6.6% of that calculated using the IPCC methodology, and this itself was considered to be an overestimate because of the degassing of antecedent dissolved N₂O present in the groundwater that fed the river.     

Denitrification in a seashore sandy deposit influenced by groundwater discharge

The chemical compositions of ground water and organic matter in sediments were investigated at a sandy shore of Tokyo Bay, Japan to determine the fate of ground water NO₃ ^–. On the basis of Cl^– distribution in ground water, the beach was classified into freshwater (FR)-, transition (TR)-, and seawater (SW)-zones from the land toward the shoreline. The NO₃ ^– and N₂O did not behave conservatively with respect to Cl^– during subsurface mixing of freshwater and seawater, suggesting NO₃ ^– consumption and N₂O production in the TR-zone. Absence of beach vegetation indicated that NO₃ ^– assimilation by higher plants was not as important as NO₃ ^– sink. Low NH₄ ⁺ concentrations in ground water revealed little reduction of NO₃ ^– to NH₄ ⁺. These facts implied that microbial denitrification and assimilation were the likely sinks for ground water NO₃ ^–. The potential activity and number of denitrifiers in water-saturated sediment were highest in the low-chlorinity part of the TR-zone. The location of the highest potential denitrification activity (DN-zone) overlapped with that of the highest NO₃ ^– concentration. The C/N ratio and carbon isotope ratio (¹³C) of organic matter in sediment (< 100 -m) varied from 12.0 to 22.5 and from –22.5 to –25.5, respectively. The ¹³C value was inversely related to the C/N ratio (r ² = 0.968, n = 11), which was explained by the mixing of organic matters of terrestrial and marine origins. In the DN-zone, the fine sediments were rich in organic matters with high C/N ratios and low ¹³C values, implying that dissolved organic matters of terrestrial origin might have been immobilized under slightly saline conditions. A concurrent supply of NO₃ ^– and organic matter to the TR-zone by ground water discharge probably generates favorable conditions for denitrifiers. Ground water NO₃ ^– discharged to the beach is thus partially denitrified and fixed as microbial biomass before it enters the sea. Further studies are necessary to determine the relative contribution of these processes for NO₃ ^– removal.     

Sources of nitrate in rivers draining sixteen watersheds in the northeastern U.S.: Isotopic constraints

The feasibility of using nitrogen and oxygenisotope ratios of nitrate (NO₃ ^–) forelucidating sources and transformations ofriverine nitrate was evaluated in a comparativestudy of 16 watersheds in the northeastern U.S.A. Stream water was sampled repeatedly at theoutlets of the watersheds between January andDecember 1999 for determining concentrations,¹⁵N values, and ¹⁸Ovalues of riverine nitrate.In conjunction with information about land useand nitrogen fluxes,¹⁵N_nitrate and¹⁸O_nitrate values providedmainly information about sources of riverinenitrate. In predominantly forested watersheds,riverine nitrate had mean concentrations ofless than 0.4 mg NO₃ ^–-N L^–1,¹⁵N_nitrate values of lessthan +5, and ¹⁸O_nitratevalues between +12 and +19. This indicatesthat riverine nitrate was almost exclusivelyderived from soil nitrification processes withpotentially minor nitrate contributions fromatmospheric deposition in some catchments. Inwatersheds with significant agricultural andurban land use, concentrations of riverinenitrate were as high as 2.6 mg NO₃ ^–-NL^–1 with ¹⁵N_nitratevalues between +5 and +8 and¹⁸O_nitrate values generallybelow +15. Correlations between nitrateconcentrations, ¹⁵N_nitratevalues, and N fluxes suggest that nitrate inwaste water constituted a major, and nitrate inmanure a minor additional source of riverinenitrate. Atmospheric nitrate deposition ornitrate-containing fertilizers were not asignificant source of riverine nitrate inwatersheds with significant agricultural andurban land use. Although complementary studiesindicate that in-stream denitrification wassignificant in all rivers, the isotopiccomposition of riverine nitrate sampled at theoutlet of the 16 watersheds did not provideevidence for denitrification in the form ofelevated ¹⁵N_nitrate and¹⁸O_nitrate values. Relativelylow isotopic enrichment factors for nitrogenand oxygen during in-stream denitrification andcontinuous admixture of nitrate from theabove-described sources are thought to beresponsible for this finding.     

Possible complication regarding phosphorus removal with a continuous flow biofilm system: diffusion limitation

Diffusion limitation of phosphate possibly constitutes a serious problem regarding the use of a biofilm reactor for enhanced biological phosphorus removal. A lab-scale reactor for simultaneous removal of phosphorus and nitrate was operated in a continuous alternating mode of operation. For a steady-state operation with excess amounts of carbon source (acetate) during the anaerobic phase, the same amount of phosphate was released during the anaerobic phase as was taken up during the anoxic phase. The measured phosphorus content of the biomass that detached during backwash after an anoxic phase was low, 2.4 +/- 0.4% (equal to 24 +/- 4 mg P/g TS). A simplified computer model indicated the reason to be phosphate diffusion limitation and the model revealed a delicate balance between the obtainable phosphorus contents of the biomass and operating parameters, such as backwash interval, biofilm thickness after backwash, and phase lengths. The aspect of diffusion is considered of crucial importance when evaluating the performance of a biofilter for phosphate removal.     

Factors influencing nitrate depletion in a rural stream

A mass balance procedure was used to analyze rates of nitrate depletion in three adjacent reaches of West Duffin Creek, Ontario, Canada. Daily nitrate losses in individual reaches were highly variable (0.5–24 kg N) during low and moderate stream flows in May–October, 1982–1985. Nitrate removal efficiency (nitrate loss as a % of nitrate input) showed a rapid exponential decline with increased nitrate inputs to each reach. Nitrate losses and nitrate removal efficiency also had a significant negative correlation with stream discharge. The association of large nitrate loads with high stream discharge reduced the nitrate removal capacity of the stream because of shorter residence times and a higher ratio of water volume to stream bed area. Water temperature exhibited a significant positive correlation with nitrate loss which may reflect increased denitrification at higher temperatures.Variations in nitrate losses and nitrate removal efficiency between the three reaches were highly influenced by differences in water residence time. Standarized nitrate losses with respect to water residence time revealed a longitudinal decline in nitrate depletion between the reaches which was associated with a downstream decrease in stream nitrate concentration and in the organic carbon content of fine textured sediments from pool habitats.     

Nitrate depletion in the riparian zone of a small woodland stream

Field enrichments with nitrate in two spring-fed drainage lines within the riparian zone of a small woodland stream near Toronto, Ontario showed an absence of nitrate depletion. Laboratory experiments with riparian substrates overlain with nitrate enriched solutions revealed a loss of only 5–8% of the nitrate during 48 h incubation at 12°C. However, 22–24% of the initial nitrate was depleted between 24 and 48 h when a second set of substrate cores was incubated at 20°C. Short-term (3 h) incubations of fresh substrates amended with acetylene were used to estimate in situ denitrification potentials which varied from 0.05–3.19 g N g^–1 d^–1 for organic and sandy sediments. Denitrification potentials were highly correlated with initial nitrate content of substrate samples implying that low nitrate levels in ground water and riparian substrates may be an important factor in controlling denitrification rates. The efficiency of nitrate removal in spring-fed drainage lines is also limited by short water residence times of < 1 h within the riparian zone. These data suggest that routes of ground water movement and substrate characteristics are important in determining nitrate depletion within stream riparian areas.