Low values on 50 gram glucose challenge test or oral 100 gram glucose tolerance test are associated with good perinatal outcome.

We set out to reevaluate the hypothesis that high normal (negative) results of 50 g oral glucose challenge test or high normal glucose level on 100 g oral glucose tolerance test are associated with complications of pregnancy and delivery. This was a prospective study involving 735 nondiabetic women. The first group (n=352) was made up of pregnant women with normal 50 g oral glucose challenge test without previous history of diabetes mellitus or gestational diabetes. The second group (n=383) was made up of pregnant women without previous history of diabetes mellitus or gestational diabetes with an abnormal 50 g oral glucose challenge test and with normal 100 g oral glucose tolerance test and not more than one previous delivery. In nondiabetic women, we demonstrated a positive correlation between high normal 50 g glucose challenge test values and the incidence of preeclampsia, caesarean section rate, macrosomia, neonatal hyperlipidaemia and minor congenital abnormalities. We failed to confirm any relationship to any pregnancy complication in pregnant women with 2-hour glucose levels in the range 6.7-9.1 mmol/l on the 100 g oral glucose tolerance test. We have demonstrated a positive relationship between the incidence of premature rupture of membranes and 1-hour glucose level, caesarean section rate and maternal 1-hour glucose level or 1-hour glucose level minus fasting glucose level of 4.2 mmol/l, instrumental delivery rate and maternal 3-hour glucose level, incidence of neonatal macrosomia and 1-hour glucose level, and incidence of neonatal hyperlipidaemia and at least one high but normal glucose level on the 100 g oral glucose tolerance test. With regard to pregnancy and delivery complications there were no significant difference if the high normal value is on the 50 g glucose challenge test or on the 100 g oral glucose tolerance test. It is concluded that one high normal 100 g oral glucose tolerance test or high normal 50 g glucose challenge test are associated with adverse pregnancy and delivery outcome. Nondiabetic women with 50 g glucose challenge test value of 6.1 mmol/l and/or 100 g oral glucose tolerance test values of 5 mmol/l have a favourable pregnancy and delivery outcome.     

Clinical predictors for a high risk for the development of diabetes mellitus in the early puerperium in women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify which maternal, antepartum, or neonatal clinical parameters were predictive for a high risk of diabetes mellitus in the puerperium in women with recent gestational diabetes mellitus and to calculate the associated diabetes mellitus rates and odds ratios. STUDY DESIGN: One thousand six hundred thirty-six women underwent an oral glucose tolerance test within 1 to 4 months of delivery. Demographic, historic, and antenatal glycemic parameters and neonatal outcome parameters were tested by univariate and multivariate logistic regression for risk of postpartum diabetes mellitus. Continuous variables were divided into quartiles that compared the upper to lower quartile adjusted odds ratio and prevalence of diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: Postpartum diabetes mellitus was diagnosed in 230 women (14.1%) according to the American Diabetes Association criteria (1997). No maternal demographic or neonatal parameters were significantly associated with diabetes mellitus. The final model of independent predictors in decreasing significance included the highest fasting plasma glucose level during pregnancy, any fasting plasma glucose level of > or = 105 mg/dL (class A(2)), the area under the curve of pregnancy oral glucose tolerance test, gestational age at diagnosis, previous gestational diabetes mellitus history, and 50-g glucose challenge test results. The fasting plasma glucose level was the best discriminator, with a 21-fold (95% CI, 4.6-96.3) increased odds ratio comparing the 4th quartile (fasting plasma glucose level, >121 mg/dL; diabetes mellitus rate, 36.7%) to 1st quartile (fasting plasma glucose level, < 95 mg/dL; diabetes mellitus rate, 0.5%). The presence of previous gestational diabetes mellitus or current class A(2) gestational diabetes mellitus approximately doubled the odds ratio for diabetes mellitus. The odds ratio increased 3- to 4-fold when the area under the curve was > or = 33.36 min small middle dot g/dL (4th quartile) or the glucose challenge test was > or = 155 mg/dL (2nd-4th quartiles) and decreased > 50% if gestational diabetes mellitus was diagnosed at > 27 weeks (3rd-4th quartile). CONCLUSION: During pregnancy, the highest fasting glucose level, followed by the severity of glucose intolerance, and earlier gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosis were the best predictors for postpartum diabetes mellitus. Diabetic education should begin during pregnancy, especially for women who are identified to be at a high risk when they are highly motivated and under medical care.     

Screening for gestational diabetes: the effect of varying blood glucose definitions in the prediction of adverse maternal and infant health outcomes

BACKGROUND: Impaired glucose tolerance in pregnancy and gestational diabetes are associated with increased maternal and fetal risks. There is considerable uncertainty in the literature relating to the merits of screening for gestational diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance, and variable definitions in the cut-off values to be used. AIMS: To assess different levels of glucose intolerance in predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study involving screening pregnant women with a 50-g oral glucose load, followed by a formal 75-g oral glucose tolerance test for women who screened positive (defined as a plasma glucose level > or = 7.8 mmol/L). Plasma glucose results were correlated with pregnancy and birth outcomes, and receiver-operator curves were constructed. RESULTS: A total of 16,975 women were screened with a glucose challenge test, with pregnancy outcome information available for 1804 women who screened positive on glucose challenge test. With increasing plasma glucose values, there was a significant increase in pre-eclampsia, Caesarean section, shoulder dystocia and neonatal hypoglycaemia. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of adverse maternal and infant pregnancy outcomes increases with increasing levels of glucose impairment despite treatment.     

Impaired glucose tolerance associated with adverse pregnancy outcome: a population-based study in southern Sweden

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a population-based study of maternal and neonatal characteristics and delivery complications in relation to the outcome of a 75-g, 2-hour oral glucose tolerance test at 25 to 30 weeks' gestation. STUDY DESIGN: An oral glucose tolerance test was offered to pregnant women in a geographically defined population. Pregnancy outcome was analyzed according to the test result. RESULTS: Among women delivered at Lund Hospital, we identified 4526 women with an oral glucose tolerance value of <7.8 mmol/L (<140 mg/dL), 131 women with a value of 7.8 to 8.9 mmol/L (140-162 mg/dL), and 116 women with gestational diabetes (> or =9.0 mmol/L [> or =162 mg/dL]). A further 28 cases of gestational diabetes were identified, giving a prevalence of 1.2%. An increased rate of cesarean delivery and infant macrosomia was observed in the group with a glucose tolerance value of 7.8 to 8.9 mmol/L (140-162 mg/dL) and in the gestational diabetes group. Advanced maternal age and high body mass index were risk factors for increased oral glucose tolerance values in 12,657 screened women in the area. CONCLUSION: The study stresses the significance of moderately increased oral glucose tolerance values.     

Effect of fetal hyperinsulinism on oral glucose tolerance test results in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to evaluate the impact of the fetoplacental glucose steal phenomenon on the results of oral glucose tolerance testing in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus with fetal hyperinsulinism. STUDY DESIGN: This was an analysis of the cases of 34 patients with two consecutive abnormal oral glucose tolerance test results and amniotic fluid insulin measurement before institution of insulin therapy. Patients were divided into groups on the basis of normal versus elevated amniotic fluid insulin concentrations. RESULTS: Oral glucose tolerance tests were done at a mean (+/-SD) of 24.9 +/- 5.7 and 30.7 +/- 3.2 weeks' gestation, and amniotic fluid insulin measurements were done at 31.1 +/- 3.2 weeks' gestation. In 13 women with gestational diabetes mellitus with normal amniotic fluid insulin concentration, maternal postload blood glucose levels at 1 hour increased by 12 mg/dL (168 vs 180 mg/dL; 9.3 vs 10.0 mmol/L; P = .0006) during the course of 6 weeks. In contrast, in 21 women with gestational diabetes mellitus with elevated amniotic fluid insulin levels (>7 microU/mL; >42 pmol/L), 1-hour postload blood glucose levels decreased by 22 mg/dL (201 vs 179 mg/dL; 11.2 vs 9.9 mmol/L; P = .002) during the same period. The higher the amniotic fluid insulin level, the larger the decrease (R = 0.504; P =.02). Although low amniotic fluid insulin levels were correlated significantly with 1-hour glucose levels of the first and second oral glucose tolerance tests, high insulin levels were no longer correlated with the second oral glucose tolerance test. CONCLUSION: Exaggerated fetal glucose siphoning may provide misleading oral glucose tolerance test results in pregnancies complicated by fetal hyperinsulinism by blunting maternal postload glucose peaks. Consequently, oral glucose tolerance test results in a pregnancy complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus with a fetus that already has hyperinsulinemia may erroneously be considered normal.     

Oral glucose tolerance testing at gestational weeks < or =16 could predict or exclude subsequent gestational diabetes mellitus during the current pregnancy in high risk group

BACKGROUND: An oral glucose tolerance test with a result that is negative but close to the diagnostic cut-off in early pregnancy was hypothesized to serve as a predictor of subsequent gestational diabetes in a high risk group. The aim of the study was to determine those cut-off values of OGTT at gestational weeks < or =16, which can predict or exclude subsequent onset of GDM in a high risk group. METHODS: Pregnant women at high risk of gestational diabetes (n = 163) underwent a 2-h, 75-g oral glucose tolerance test at gestational weeks < or =16 were analyzed in this study. In the event of a negative result, subsequent oral glucose tolerance tests were performed at gestational weeks 24-28 and 32-34. The sensitivity, the specificity, the positive and negative predictive values and the Odds ratio of the best cut-off values of fasting and postload glucose levels were calculated. RESULTS: The best cut-off values to exclude subsequent GDM for fasting and postload glucose were 5.0 and 6.2 mmol/l, respectively. In combination, the best cut-off values were 5.3 mmol/l for fasting and 6.8 mmol/l for postload glucose, with negative predictive values of 0.97 and 0.71 and sensitivities of 96.9 and 86.3 at gestational weeks 24-28 and 32-34, respectively. Combination of these cut-off values with obesity proved to be very predictive for gestational diabetes by gestational weeks 32-34, with an Odds ratio of 6.0 [95% confidence interval: 1.7-21.0]. CONCLUSIONS: With regard to the very high negative predictive value of the method, pregnant women with glucose levels of < or =5.3 mmol/l at fasting and of < or = 6.8 mmol/l at postload in gestational weeks < or =16 should undergo subsequent oral glucose tolerance testing merely at gestational weeks 32-34. Approximately a quarter (24.5%) of the pregnant women at risk of gestational diabetes satisfied these criteria.     

妊娠期糖尿病孕妇产后糖代谢异常的研究

目的　了解妊娠期糖尿病（ＧＤＭ） 患者产后糖代谢异常情况、筛出预测产后糖代谢异常的高危因素及ＧＤＭ 患者远期糖尿病发生情况。　方法　收集１９８２ 年１１ 月～１９９８ 年４ 月在我院分娩并产后随访的９７ 例ＧＤＭ 孕妇,其中远期随访１～８ 年者３３ 例。　结果　ＧＤＭ 产后近期随访诊断为显性糖尿病者２３ 例,糖耐量减低１１ 例,列为产后糖代谢异常组。与产后糖代谢正常组（４１ 例） 进行比较发现：糖尿病家族史、孕期血糖异常出现时间、糖筛查血糖高、空腹血糖升高以及糖尿病孕期治疗情况两组间存在明显差异。远期追踪３３ 例中显性糖尿病１０ 例,糖耐量减低３ 例。　结论　ＧＤＭ产后仍有部分患者糖代谢不能恢复正常,尤其有糖尿病家族史,在妊娠２４ 周以前确诊ＧＤＭ,糖筛查血糖较高,空腹血糖升高,孕期需胰岛素治疗者更应重视产后血糖检查,以便及时发现产后糖代谢异常。产后近期糖代谢正常者,仍需进行远期随访     

Gestational diabetes diagnosed in third trimester pregnancy and pregnancy outcome.

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of gestational diabetes diagnosed in the third trimester is unclear. A prospective observational study was performed on a cohort of women without pre-existing gestational diabetes or other medical disorders to examine the effect of gestational diabetes on pregnancy complications and infant outcome. METHODS: Four hundred and eighty-nine consecutive women were assessed at 28-30 weeks by random glucose screening and/or a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test. The subsequent management was according to established departmental protocols. The outcome of pregnancy was compared among the groups with negative screening, positive screening but normal glucose tolerance, and gestational diabetes which was controlled with diet therapy. RESULTS: Women with gestational diabetes (n=67 or 13.7%) had significantly increased maternal age, pre-pregnancy weight and body mass index, hemoglobin levels at booking and at 36-38 weeks, and incidences of parity >1, pre-eclampsia, and female infants, while the gestational age was shorter and there was no significant difference in the birthweight outcome or neonatal morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Despite diet treatment, gestational diabetes diagnosed in the last trimester is associated with increased risk of pre-eclampsia and shorter length of gestation, and this is likely to reflect a pathological process rather than the physiological effect of pregnancy on maternal glucose tolerance.     

Predictive factors for the development of diabetes in women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of diabetes in women with previous dietary-treated gestational diabetes mellitus and to identify predictive factors for development of diabetes. STUDY DESIGN: Two to 11 years post partum, glucose tolerance was investigated in 241 women with previous dietary-treated gestational diabetes mellitus and 57 women without previous gestational diabetes mellitus (control group). RESULTS: Diabetes developed in 42 (17.4%) women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus (3.7% insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and 13.7% non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus). Diabetes did not develop in any of the controls. Predictive factors for diabetes development were fasting glucose level at diagnosis (high glucose, high risk), preterm delivery, and an oral glucose tolerance test result that showed diabetes 2 months post partum. In a subgroup of previous patients with gestational diabetes mellitus in whom plasma insulin was measured during an oral glucose tolerance test in late pregnancy a low insulin response at diagnosis was found to be an independent predictive factor for diabetes development. CONCLUSIONS: Women with previous dietary-treated gestational diabetes mellitus have a considerably increased risk of later having diabetes. Follow-up investigations are therefore important, especially in those women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus in whom the identified predictive factors are present.     

Postpartum metabolism and autoantibody markers in women with gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed in early pregnancy

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to study postpartum metabolism and autoantibody markers of type 1 diabetes mellitus in women with gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed in early pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty women with gestational diabetes diagnosed in early pregnancy were compared with 72 women who had gestational diabetes diagnosed in late pregnancy. Glucose tolerance, parameters of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, and antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase and to islet cells were measured. RESULTS: The percentages of overt diabetes and abnormal glucose tolerance were significantly higher in the early-pregnancy group (26.7% vs 1.4%; P =.0002; and 40% vs 5.56%; P <.0001; respectively). Only 1 woman had positive test results for antibodies to the islet cells. The rate of positive test results for antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase was similar in both groups (13.7% vs 9.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Women with early gestational diabetes have an increased risk of postpartum diabetes mellitus, whereas those with late-onset gestational diabetes have a minimal risk. In women predisposed to type 1 diabetes, gestational diabetes develops either early or late in pregnancy.     

Early-pregnancy glucose screening for gestational diabetes mellitus

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of the 50-g, one-hour glucose screening test administered at 16 weeks of pregnancy for identifying women with gestational diabetes mellitus. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred fifty-five women underwent 50-g, one-hour glucose screening tests at 16 weeks of pregnancy. Those with results > or = 135 mg/dL underwent 100-g, three-hour glucose tolerance tests. All patients without diagnoses of gestational diabetes during the second trimester of pregnancy underwent standard third-trimester glucose testing. RESULTS: Gestational diabetes mellitus was diagnosed in 25 patients. Glucose screening tests administered at 16 weeks of pregnancy identified 96% (24) of these patients. Patients with 16-week glucose screening test results > or = 135 mg/dL had a 55% risk of developing diabetes during pregnancy, while the risk was 0.6% for patients with 16-week test results < or = 110 mg/dL. Patients with 16-week glucose screening test results in the intermediate range, 111-134 mg/dL, had a 4.8% risk of developing diabetes during pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Glucose screening at 16 weeks of pregnancy is a useful alternative to third-trimester screening for gestational diabetes. The negative predictive value of screening test results < or = 110 mg/dL is 99.4%. The positive predictive value for screening test results > or = 135 mg/dL is 55%. This latter finding is superior to the 8.6-22% found during the third-trimester.     

Perinatal complications in women with gestational diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to examine the outcome of the pregnancy and neonatal period in 1) women with gestational diabetes mellitus and non-diabetic pregnant women, and 2) in women with early and late diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Included were 327 women with gestational diabetes mellitus and 295 non-diabetic women, who were screened with a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test because of risk factors for gestational diabetes. Women with gestational diabetes mellitus were treated with low-caloric diet and insulin when appropriate, while women in the control group received routine antenatal care. RESULTS: Gestational age at delivery was significantly lower in the group with gestational diabetes mellitus, both when considering all deliveries (39.1+/-1.7 weeks versus 39.8+/-2.0 weeks, p<0.05) and only those with spontaneous onset of labor (38.8+/-2.0 weeks versus 40.0+/-1.6 weeks, p<0.05). The frequency of macrosomia was increased, although not statistically significant (8% vs. 2%, p=0.07), and the rate of admission to the neonatal ward was significantly increased (18% vs. 9%, p<0.05) in the group with gestational diabetes. Women with early diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus had a significantly increased need for insulin treatment during pregnancy (36% vs. 9% p<0.05) and a significantly higher occurrence of diabetes mellitus at follow-up from two months until three years postpartum. CONCLUSIONS: This study of women with gestational diabetes mellitus and non-diabetic pregnant women showed that gestational diabetes mellitus was associated with a significantly lower gestational age at delivery and an increased rate of admission to the neonatal ward. Women diagnosed with GDM before 20 weeks of gestation had an increased need for insulin treatment during pregnancy and a high risk of subsequent overt DM, compared with women diagnosed with GDM later in pregnancy.     

Diabetic family history is an isolated risk factor for gestational diabetes after 30 years of age

BACKGROUND: Family history of diabetes is regarded as a risk factor for gestational glucose intolerance. Most selective screening policy includes family history as an indication of oral glucose tolerance test. However, few studies had evaluated the actual incidence of glucose intolerance in this group of women. METHODS: Pregnant women with oral glucose tolerance test performed for family history of diabetes over two consecutive years were identified. Receiver operating curve was used to identify the age cut-off that give the highest sensitivity and specificity. The incidence of glucose intolerance was compared between women with age above and below this cut-off. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-seven women were identified. The age cut-off selected was 30.5 years. In young women (age 相似文献   

Postpartum diabetes screening: value of fructosamine determination]

After birth of an infant with a birthweight of 4000 g or more maternal glucose tolerance should be examined. We measured blood glucose values after a 100 g oral glucose challenge and compared them with serum fructosamine values of the same subjects. 40 women who had given birth to an infant with macrosomia (group I) were matched with 40 women who had delivered babies with normal birthweight (group II). Impaired glucose tolerance was found in 6 women (15%) of group I, and in one woman (2.5%) of group II. Fructosamine values were within the normal range in each of the seven women (1.74 + 0.2 mmol/l vs 1.73 + 0.2 mmol/l). Thus, fructosamine determination is not sensitive enough to detect impaired glucose tolerance in asymptomatic women post partum. It is not feasible to replace the oral glucose tolerance test in screening for gestational diabetes mellitus.     

Postnatal testing for diabetes in Australian women following gestational diabetes mellitus

Background:  Postnatal blood glucose testing is recommended for reclassification of glucose tolerance following a pregnancy affected by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM); however, there are limited data on the postnatal follow-up sought by Australian women.
Aims:  To describe postnatal diabetes testing patterns in Australian women following a pregnancy affected by GDM and identify factors associated with return for follow-up testing in accordance with the Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society (ADIPS) guidelines.
Methods:  A cross-sectional self-administered survey of 1372 women diagnosed with GDM between 2003 and 2005, sampled from the National Diabetes Services Scheme database.
Results:  Postnatal diabetes testing was reported by 73.2% of survey respondents with 27.4% returning for an oral glucose test tolerance at six to eight weeks post-GDM pregnancy. Using logistic regression analysis, factors associated with appropriate postnatal testing were receiving individualised risk reduction advice (odds ratio (OR) 1.41 (1.08,1.84)) or written information (OR 1.35 (1.03,1.76)) and in two-way interactions, being under the care of an endocrinologist and not tertiary educated (OR 2.09 (1.49,2.93)) as well as seeing an obstetrician and diabetes educator during pregnancy (OR 1.72 (1.19,2.48)). Every five years increase in age reduced the likelihood of a woman returning for testing by 17%.
Conclusions:  Specialist diabetes care in non-tertiary educated women, or a team approach to management with diabetes education and obstetric care may act to reinforce the need for postnatal diabetes testing in accordance with the ADIPS guidelines. Individualised follow up from a health professional and provision of written information following a GDM pregnancy may also encourage return for postnatal testing in this high-risk group.     

Postpartum testing for antecedent gestational diabetes

Gestational diabetes is a predictor of glucose intolerance in subsequent pregnancies and in the nongravid state. Many pregnant women are not tested for gestational diabetes, although they or their offspring may show signs suggestive of antecedent hyperglycemia. We examined the diagnostic utility of a postpartum (within 48 hours), 100 gm, oral glucose tolerance test and cord plasma glucose, cord plasma C-peptide, and 2-hour neonatal plasma glucose tests to detect antecedent gestational diabetes in women with documented gestational diabetes (n = 37) or with normal glucose tolerance test results late in the third trimester (n = 28). The 1-hour, 2-hour, and incremental 1-hour + 2-hour [( 1-hour - fasting] + [2-hour - fasting]) [2-hour - fasting]) glucose values of the postpartum glucose tolerance test showed significant differences between study participants with and without gestational diabetes (164 +/- 30 versus 115 +/- 22, 145 +/- 31 versus 101 +/- 21, and 153 +/- 51 versus 67 +/- 33 mg/dl, respectively, p less than 0.025). Maternal fasting and 3-hour postpartum glucose tolerance test glucose, cord plasma glucose, cord plasma C-peptide, and 2-hour neonatal plasma glucose values showed no significant between-group differences. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses for these tests indicated that the incremental 1-hour + 2-hour postpartum glucose tolerance test glucose values best sustain test specificity at the low test threshold values necessary for high test sensitivity. A threshold of 110 mg/dl for this test yielded a predicted specificity of 90% and sensitivity of 80% with regard to antecedent gestational diabetes.     

Birthweight in women with potential gestational diabetes mellitus--an effect of obesity rather than glucose intolerance?

BACKGROUND: The purpose was to compare the influence of varying levels of glycemia on the perinatal outcome. METHODS: The data charts of 383 women screened for gestational diabetes mellitus with an oral glucose tolerance test during two birthyears were retrospectively evaluated. In 55 women gestational diabetes mellitus was diagnosed and treated with diet. The non-diabetic women (n=328) were subdivided into a borderline diabetes group (n=74) and a normal group (n= 254) on the basis of the oral glucose tolerance test result. The birth registry of 8196 singleton pregnancies from The Perinatal Research Unit at Skejby University Hospital served as the background population. RESULTS: Birthweight was highest in the borderline group. Weight increase during pregnancy was larger in the non-diabetic than the gestational diabetic women (15 vs. 8 kg p<0.01). The women with less increase of body weight delivered neonates with lower birthweight than those with higher increase. Birthweight was associated with maternal weight during pregnancy (p<0.01). Birthweight ratio increased with increasing glucose intolerance. Vaginal delivery rate was less and cesarean section rate higher in women with gestational diabetes mellitus compared to the non-diabetic women. No significant difference was found in the incidence of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy or neonatal morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Even minor hyperglycemia is associated with increasing birthweight. Birthweight is reduced in GDM when dietary treatment is instituted and effect on weight gain is achieved.     

妊娠期血糖异常产后母儿随访分析

目的　探讨妊娠期不同程度的血糖异常者产后发生糖尿病 (DM )的高危因素和预防措施 ,以及妊娠期血糖异常对其子女的远期不良影响等。方法　对 1994～ 2 0 0 0年 196例妊娠期血糖异常者进行产后随访 ,其中50 g葡萄糖筛查阳性 (50g阳性 ) 12 3例 ,葡萄糖耐量减低 (IGT) 3 7例 ,妊娠期糖尿病 (GDM ) 3 6例。此 3组人群均进行 75g葡萄糖耐量试验 (OGTT )及血脂检测。对其子女行血糖检测及生长发育水平观察 ,包括测量头围、胸围、身高及体重等。结果　 196例随访者中发生IGT、空腹血糖异常 (IFG)、DM共 2 2例 (占 11 2 2 % ) ,其中 50g阳性、IGT、GDM者其产后平均 3年内血糖异常发生率依次为 2 43 %、2 1 62 %、3 0 56% ,后两者与 50 g阳性相比差异有显著性意义 (P <0 0 1) ,其相关因素与产妇高龄 (40 90 % )、肥胖体型 (2 1 2 7% )、孕期血糖控制不良(45 45% )、产后体重显著增加 (40 91% )有关。 14 5例随访子女中虽血糖检测未见异常 ,但发生肥胖者 16例 (占11 0 3 % ) ,且其母孕期血糖控制不良者 9例 (占 56 2 5% )。结论　GDM及IGT者产后DM发生率高 ,应引起重视。妊娠期及时有效地控制高血糖及产后继续饮食调理与加强运动疗法 ,对维护产后母儿健康有益     

The fate of patients with diabetes in pregnancy--classification of gestational diabetes following the completion of pregnancy (p.g. classification)

In 69 patients with a gestational diabetes-diagnosed by reproducible pathological results of two oral glucose loads (50 g) or by fasting blood glucose values of greater than or equal to 6.7 mmol/l in pregnancy the carbohydrate metabolism was checked postgestationally again with a glucose tolerance test (75 g) in a period of 6 weeks up to 2 years post partum. The postgestational classification showed the following results: manifested diabetes n = 15 (21.7%), impaired glucose tolerance n = 15 (21.7%), non-classificable disturbed carbohydrate tolerance n = 10 (14.5%), normal test results n = 29 (42%). The high rate of diabetic manifestations underlines the necessity of a postgestational classification of the so-called gestational diabetes controlled by the delivering center. The high risk of manifestation is calculable in the whole group, but not predictable for the single case. The risk is the higher the earlier a glucosuria in pregnancy can be found (before the 24th week), the earlier an insulinisation is necessary to guarantee a normoglycemia and the higher individual deviations of the individual blood glucose values during the daily course are observed (measurable with the glycemic index acc. Michaelis et al.). Additional risk factors are: obesity, an age over 30 years at the beginning of pregnancy, and heredity of first degree. From the retrospective point of view of a postgestational classification new therapeutic aspects could not be verified to avoid diabetes manifestation. Nevertheless an exact normoglycemic control and a very early start of treatment, a correct screening of risk factors and an immediate diagnosis of a gestational diabetes are a supposition to avert hyperglycemic dangers from the child.     

Evaluation of the WHO criteria for 75 g oral glucose tolerance test in pregnancy

Summary. A group of pregnant women at high risk of developing diabetes in pregnancy had paired oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) using a 100 g load followed by 75 g load. When the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria and the National Diabetes Data Group (NDDG) criteria were compared, the 2-h plasma glucose value after the 100 g load was the most discriminative in differentiating those with normal glucose tolerance, impaired glucose tolerance and gestational diabetes mellitus. When only the 2-h plasma glucose values were assessed, the WHO test (75 g: 8 mmol/1) agreed with the NDDG test (100 g load: 9·2 mmol/1) in the diagnosis of glucose intolerance in 60% of subjects only. Using the same criteria at 2-h (8 mmol/1) the agreement between these tests was 47%. Reducing the glucose load from 100 g to 75 g produced a reduced glucose response in 49% of the subjects, with a significant decrease in the area under the glucose response curve.