Divergence bounded computable real numbers

A real x$x$ is called h$h$-bounded computable  , for some function h:N→N$h:\mathbb{N}\to \mathbb{N}$, if there is a computable sequence (_xs)$(x_s)$ of rational numbers which converges to x$x$ such that, for any n∈N$n\in \mathbb{N}$, at most h(n)$h(n)$ non-overlapping pairs of its members are separated by a distance larger than 2^-n$2^{-n}$. In this paper we discuss properties of h$h$-bounded computable reals for various functions h$h$. We will show a simple sufficient condition for a class of functions h$h$ such that the corresponding h$h$-bounded computable reals form an algebraic field. A hierarchy theorem for h$h$-bounded computable reals is also shown. Besides we compare semi-computability and weak computability with the h$h$-bounded computability for special functions h$h$.     

Adaptive timeliness of consensus in presence of crash and timing faults

The Δ$\mathrm{\Delta }$-timed uniform consensus is a stronger variant of the traditional consensus and it satisfies the following additional property: every correct process terminates its execution within a constant time Δ$\mathrm{\Delta }$ (Δ$\mathrm{\Delta }$-timeliness), and no two processes decide differently (uniformity). In this paper, we consider the Δ$\mathrm{\Delta }$-timed uniform consensus problem in presence of _fc$f_{\mathrm{c}}$ crash processes and _ft$f_{\mathrm{t}}$ timing-faulty processes, and propose a Δ$\mathrm{\Delta }$-timed uniform consensus algorithm. The proposed algorithm is adaptive in the following sense: it solves the Δ$\mathrm{\Delta }$-timed uniform consensus when at least _ft+1$f_{\mathrm{t}}+1$ correct processes exist in the system. If the system has less than _ft+1$f_{\mathrm{t}}+1$ correct processes, the algorithm cannot solve the Δ$\mathrm{\Delta }$-timed uniform consensus. However, as long as _ft+1$f_{\mathrm{t}}+1$ processes are non-crashed, the algorithm solves (non-timed) uniform consensus. We also investigate the maximum number of faulty processes that can be tolerated. We show that any Δ$\mathrm{\Delta }$-timed uniform consensus algorithm tolerating up to _ft$f_{\mathrm{t}}$ timing-faulty processes requires that the system has at least _ft+1$f_{\mathrm{t}}+1$ correct processes. This impossibility result implies that the proposed algorithm attains the maximum resilience about the number of faulty processes. We also show that any Δ$\mathrm{\Delta }$-timed uniform consensus algorithm tolerating up to _ft$f_{\mathrm{t}}$ timing-faulty processes cannot solve the (non-timed) uniform consensus when the system has less than _ft+1$f_{\mathrm{t}}+1$ non-crashed processes. This impossibility result implies that our algorithm attains the maximum adaptiveness.     

Bounding the radii of balls meeting every connected component of semi-algebraic sets

We prove an explicit bound on the radius of a ball centered at the origin which is guaranteed to contain all bounded connected components of a semi-algebraic set S⊂R^k$S\subset {\mathbb{R}}^k$ defined by a weak sign condition involving s$s$ polynomials in Z[_X1,…,_Xk]$\mathbb{Z}[X_1,\dots ,X_k]$ having degrees at most d$d$, and whose coefficients have bitsizes at most τ$\tau$. Our bound is an explicit function of s,d,k$s,d,k$ and τ$\tau$, and does not contain any undetermined constants. We also prove a similar bound on the radius of a ball guaranteed to intersect every connected component of S$S$ (including the unbounded components). While asymptotic bounds of the form 2^τdO(k)$2^{\tau d^{O\left(k\right)}}$ on these quantities were known before, some applications require bounds which are explicit and which hold for all values of s,d,k$s,d,k$ and τ$\tau$. The bounds proved in this paper are of this nature.     

Origami fold as algebraic graph rewriting

We formalize paper fold (origami) by graph rewriting. Origami construction is abstractly described by a rewriting system (O,?)$(\mathbb{O},?)$, where O$\mathbb{O}$ is the set of abstract origamis and ?$?$ is a binary relation on O$\mathbb{O}$, that models fold  . An abstract origami is a structure (Π,∽,?)$(\Pi ,\backsim ,?)$, where Π$\Pi$ is a set of faces constituting an origami, and ∽$\backsim$ and ?$?$ are binary relations on Π$\Pi$, each representing adjacency and superposition relations between the faces.