路与星、扇、轮图的积图的邻点可区别Ⅰ-全染色

图G的Ⅰ-全染色是指若干种颜色对图G的顶点和边的一个分配,使得任意两个相邻顶点的颜色不同,任意两条相邻边的颜色不同.在图G的一个Ⅰ-全染色下,G的任意一个点的色集合是指该点的颜色以及与该点相关联的全体边的颜色构成的集合.图G的一个Ⅰ-全染色称为是邻点可区别的,如果任意两个相邻点的色集合不相等.对一个图G进行邻点可区别Ⅰ-全染色所用的最少颜色的数目称为图G的邻点可区别Ⅰ-全色数.应用构造具体染色的方法给出了路与星、扇、轮图的积图的邻点可区别Ⅰ-全色数     

若干倍图的邻点可区别Ⅵ-全染色

图的一个边正常的全染色满足相邻点的色集合不同时被称为邻点可区别Ⅵ-全染色,把所用的最少颜色数称为邻点可区别Ⅵ-全色数,其中任意一点的色集合为点上与关联边所染的颜色构成的集合.应用构造邻点可区别Ⅵ-全染色函数法得到了路、圈、星和扇的倍图的邻点可区别Ⅵ-全色数,进一步验证图的邻点可区别Ⅵ-全染色猜想.     

图的邻点可区别全色数的一个上界

图G的一个正常全染色被称为邻点可区别全染色,如果G中任意两个相邻点的色集合不同．本文用概率方法得到了邻点可区别全色数的一个上界．     

图的邻点可区别全染色的渐近性质

图G的一个正常全染色被称为邻点可区别全染色,如果G中任意两个相邻点的色集合不同,其所用的最少颜色数称为邻点可区别全色数.张忠辅老师猜想:对于|V(G)|≥3的连通图G,其邻点可区别全色数最多不超过△(G)+3.用概率方法证明了对简单图G,△≥14,有χ_(at)(G)≤△+C,其中C≥10~(26)+1.     

图的半强积的邻点可区别染色

两个简单图G与H的半强积G·H是具有顶点集V(G)×V(H)的简单图,其中两个顶点(u,v)与(u',v')相邻当且仅当u=u'且vv'∈E(H),或uu'∈E(G)且vv'∈E(H).图的邻点可区别边(全)染色是指相邻点具有不同色集的正常边(全)染色.统称图的邻点可区别边染色与邻点可区别全染色为图的邻点可区别染色.图G的邻点可区别染色所需的最少的颜色数称为邻点可区别染色数,并记为X_a~((r))(G),其中r=1,2,且X_a~((1))(G)与X_a~((2))(G)分别表示G的邻点可区别的边色数与全色数.给出了两个简单图的半强积的邻点可区别染色数的一个上界,并证明了该上界是可达的.然后,讨论了两个树的不同半强积具有相同邻点可区别染色数的充分必要条件.另外,确定了一类图与完全图的半强积的邻点可区别染色数的精确值.     

路、圈的广义Mycielski图的邻点可区别Ⅰ-全色数

图G的邻点可区别Ⅰ-全染色是一个满足相邻顶点色集合不同的Ⅰ-全染色,其中任意一点的色集合包含该顶点及其关联边所染的颜色.所需颜色的最小数称为邻点可区别Ⅰ-全色数,记作χ_atⁱ(G).研究了路和圈的广义Mycielski图的邻点可区别Ⅰ-全色数:对于阶数n≥2的路P_n,当n=2,3,4时,有χ_atⁱ(M(P_n))=n+1;否则,χ_atⁱ(M(P_n))=n.对于阶数n≥3的圈C_n,当n=3,4时,有χ_atⁱ(M(C_n))=5;否则,χ_atⁱ(M(C_n))=n.     

Pm□Pn的Smarandachely-邻点可区别边色数

图G的正常边染色f满足相邻点的色集合相不互包含时,该染色称为图G的Smarandcchely-邻点可区别边染色,其中S(x)={f(xw)|xw∈E(G)}称之为在f下的顶点x的色集合.该染色称为图G的Smarandchely-邻点可区别边染色.对图G进行的.Smarandchely-邻点可区别边染色所用最少颜色数称为图G的Smarandachely-邻点可区别边色数.讨论了Pm□Pn的Smarandchely-邻点可区别边色数.     

关于联图K_(2,n)∨P_m的邻点可区别的全染色

一个全染色被称为邻点可区别的如果它满足对任意两个相邻点所关联的色集合不同.本文给出了联图K2,n∨Pm的邻点可区别的全色数并且证明了它满足邻点可区别的全染色猜想.     

围长至少为6的平面图的邻点可区别边染色

邻点可区别边染色是指图G有一个正常边染色且任意两个相邻顶点的颜色集合不相等.邻点可区别边色数是指使图G有一个邻点可区别边染色的最小颜色数值,记作χ_α’(G).本文证明了:若图G是围长至少为6的正常平面图,则有χ_α’(G)≤max{6,△(G)+1}.     

M(C_n)和M(W_n)图的邻点可区别的Ⅰ-全色数

研究了M(C_n)和M(W_n)图的邻点可区别的I-一全染色.根据M(C_n)和M(W_n)图的构造特征,利用构造函数法,构造了一个从点边集V(G)∪E(G)到色集合{1,2,…,k)的函数,给出了一种染色方案,得到了它们的邻点可区别的I-全色数.     

冠图Cm·Cn与Cm·Kn的邻点可区别I-全染色

为了寻找一般图的邻点可区别I-全染色法,应用构染色函数法给出了冠图Cm·Cn和Cm·Kn的邻点可区别I-全染色,得到了其邻点可区别I-全色数,进一步验证了邻点可区别I-全染色的猜想.     

A note on the article “Fuzzy totally continuous and totally semi-continuous functions”

A. Mukherjee has introduced the concepts of fuzzy totally continuous and fuzzy totally semi-continuous functions in 1999. Apart from the fact that fuzzy total continuity and fuzzy total semi-continuity were introduced in Mukherjee's paper without regard for whether they are topological notions (i.e. give rise to topological categories) or for whether there are deep, canonical examples of such concepts, we show in this note that there are mathematical errors in some of the claimed results of the paper as well.     

Computation of the Folkman number Fe(3, 3; 5)

With the help of computer algorithms, we improve the lower bound on the edge Folkman number F_e(3, 3; 5) and vertex Folkman number F_v(3, 3; 4), and, thus, show that the exact values of these numbers are 15 and 14, respectively. We also present computer enumeration of all critical graphs. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 32: 41–49, 1999     

A Note on Adjacent Strong Edge Coloring of K（n,m）

In this paper, we prove that the adjacent strong edge chromatic number of a graph K（n,m） is n ＋ 1, with n ≥ 2, m ≥ 1.     

Improper Coloring of Sparse Graphs with a Given Girth,II: Constructions

A graph G is ‐colorable if can be partitioned into two sets and so that the maximum degree of is at most j and of is at most k. While the problem of verifying whether a graph is (0, 0)‐colorable is easy, the similar problem with in place of (0, 0) is NP‐complete for all nonnegative j and k with . Let denote the supremum of all x such that for some constant every graph G with girth g and for every is ‐colorable. It was proved recently that . In a companion paper, we find the exact value . In this article, we show that increasing g from 5 further on does not increase much. Our constructions show that for every g, . We also find exact values of for all g and all .     

Mixing Homomorphisms,Recolorings, and Extending Circular Precolorings

This work brings together ideas of mixing graph colorings, discrete homotopy, and precoloring extension. A particular focus is circular colorings. We prove that all the ‐colorings of a graph G can be obtained by successively recoloring a single vertex provided along the lines of Cereceda, van den Heuvel, and Johnson's result for k‐colorings. We give various bounds for such mixing results and discuss their sharpness, including cases where the bounds for circular and classical colorings coincide. As a corollary, we obtain an Albertson‐type extension theorem for ‐precolorings of circular cliques. Such a result was first conjectured by Albertson and West. General results on homomorphism mixing are presented, including a characterization of graphs G for which the endomorphism monoid can be generated through the mixing process. As in similar work of Brightwell and Winkler, the concept of dismantlability plays a key role.     

On defected colourings of graphs

Abstract A k-edge-coloring f of a connected graph G is a （A1, A2, , A）-defected k-edge-coloring if there is a smallest integer/ with 1 _ /3 _〈 k - i such that the multiplicity of each color j E {1,2,... ,/3} appearing at a vertex is equal to Aj _〉 2, and each color of {/3 -}- 1,/3 - 2, - , k} appears at some vertices at most one time. The （A1, A2,, A/）-defected chromatic index of G, denoted as X （A1, A2,, A/; G）, is the smallest number such that every （A1,A2,-.., A/）-defected t-edge-coloring of G holds t _〉 X（A1, A2 A;; G）. We obtain A（G） X（A1, ）2, , A/; G） ＋ -- （Ai - 1） _〈 /k（G） 1, and introduce two new chromatic indices of G i=1 as： the vertex pan-biuniform chromatic index X pb （G）, and the neighbour vertex pan-biuniform chromatic index Xnpb（G）, and furthermore find the structure of a tree T having X pb （T） =1.     

Coloring graphs from lists with bounded size of their union

A graph G is k‐choosable if its vertices can be colored from any lists L(ν) of colors with |L(ν)| ≥ k for all ν ∈ V(G). A graph G is said to be (k,?)‐choosable if its vertices can be colored from any lists L(ν) with |L(ν)| ≥k, for all ν∈ V(G), and with . For each 3 ≤ k ≤ ?, we construct a graph G that is (k,?)‐choosable but not (k,? + 1)‐choosable. On the other hand, it is proven that each (k,2k ? 1)‐choosable graph G is O(k · ln k · 2^4k)‐choosable. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory