首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

居住权基本理论问题反思——评居住权的否定理由
引用本文:曾大鹏.居住权基本理论问题反思——评居住权的否定理由[J].河北法学,2006,24(11):106-110.
作者姓名:曾大鹏
作者单位:北京大学,法学院,北京,100871
摘    要:否定居住权的各项理由值得商榷.脱离人役权的概念体系,在物权法中单独规定居住权也是可行的.人役权制度的废弃并非铁板一块的绝对真理.居住权制度具有无法为其他制度所替代的独特功能,它并未放弃对效益价值的追求,要辩证地理解居住权的不可转让性.在居住权法律关系中,保姆一般是间接受益人.

关 键 词:居住权  人役权  物权法
文章编号:1002-3933(2006)11-0106-05
修稿时间:2006年4月11日

Reconsideration on the Fundamental Theoretical Issues of Right of Habitation——Valuing on the negative reasons of right of habitation
ZENG Da-peng.Reconsideration on the Fundamental Theoretical Issues of Right of Habitation——Valuing on the negative reasons of right of habitation[J].Hebei Law Science,2006,24(11):106-110.
Authors:ZENG Da-peng
Abstract:It's worth negotiating the negative reasons of right of habitation. Beyond the conception and system of personal servitude, it's practicable to regulate right of habitation in property law. It's not a truth pure and simple to abandon the system of personal servitude. The system of right of habitation has special functions that can't be replaced by other systems, because it hasn't lose the aim at the value of efficiency, and we should understand its inalienability dialectically. In general, the nurse is an indirect beneficiary in the privities of right of habitation.
Keywords:right of habitation  personal servitude  property law
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号