Contribution of cost to treatment nonadherence in the US breast cancer survivors: a population-based analysis

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment - Breast cancer survivors are often prescribed medications for at least 5 years to reduce recurrence risk, yet some forego this treatment due to cost....     

Characteristics of Multifocal and Multicentric Breast Cancers

Annals of Surgical Oncology - Multifocality and multicentricity are increasingly recognized in breast cancer. However, little is known about the characteristics and biology of these cancers and the...     

Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Colon and Rectum: Prognostic Relevance and Comparative Performance of Current Staging Systems

Background

With increasing interest in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), three staging systems for NETs of the colon and rectum have been published. Their prognostic relevance has not been examined and compared in an independent clinical database.

Methods

From the National Cancer Database (NCDB), 5457 patients diagnosed with colorectal neuroendocrine tumor (CRNETs) between 1998 and 2002 were staged according to the staging systems from (1) European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS, 2006; n = 1537); (2) American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC, 2009; n = 1140); and (3) location-specific staging systems from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER, 2008; n = 942). Stage-stratified overall survival (OS) and Cox-specific concordance indices were calculated for each system. Independent prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis.

Results

Five-year OS for stage I, II, III, and IV CRNETs as defined by the ENETS staging system were 90.8, 77.3, 53.1, and 14.8 %, respectively. For well-differentiated CRNETs, the 5-year OS for stage I, II, III, and IV as defined by the AJCC staging system were superior: 90.6, 83.9, 64.8, and 24.9 %, respectively. Both staging systems had a concordance index of 0.72. After specifying location in the colon versus rectum, all three systems demonstrated acceptable performance. Histologic grade was a significant independent predictor of OS not currently incorporated in the staging systems.

Conclusions

The three staging systems showed comparable prognostic stratification of CRNETs, while the AJCC and ENETS systems are the most parsimonious. The current analysis supports the use of the AJCC for well-differentiated disease and ENETS systems for all CRNETs until there is further evidence for modification.     

Validation of the Louisville breast sentinel node prediction models and a proposed modification to guide management of the node positive axilla

The ACOSOG Z11 trial is rapidly changing use of axillary dissection, but it is not known how generalizable the Z11 results are. This study compares characteristics of the Z11 patients with the larger group of sentinel node-positive patients and evaluates two previously described Louisville algorithms to determine whether they might still be useful to predict extent of axillary node involvement and guide management of the axilla. The Yale Breast Center database was queried to calculate the Louisville prediction points for patients with a positive sentinel node and to compare the predicted with actual results. Of 1215 sentinel node biopsies performed between 2004 and 2010, 282 (23%) had at least one positive node. Thirty-one per cent of these patients would have been eligible for Z11. This group had much less axillary node involvement than the 69 per cent who were ineligible. The Yale data confirmed the accuracy of the two Louisville models and showed that tumor size, number of positive sentinel nodes, and proportion of positive sentinel nodes were all significant predictors. However, these results were much more robust if at least three sentinel nodes had been removed. The Z11 patients were clearly a good risk group. The data validate the two Louisville models and suggest that the models may be useful to select patients to avoid axillary dissection, both among the currently Z11-eligible and -ineligible populations. A modified algorithm is proposed in which all patients with a positive sentinel node have at least three total nodes removed.     

Trends and clinical implications of preoperative breast MRI in Medicare beneficiaries with breast cancer

While there has been increasing interest in the use of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for women with breast cancer, little is known about trends in MRI use, or the association of MRI with surgical approach among older women. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results–Medicare database, we identified a cohort of women diagnosed with breast cancer from 2000 to 2009 who underwent surgery. We used Medicare claims to identify preoperative breast MRI and surgical approach. We evaluated temporal trends in MRI use according to age and type of surgery, and identified factors associated with MRI. We assessed the association between MRI and surgical approach: breast-conserving surgery (BCS) versus mastectomy, bilateral versus unilateral mastectomy, and use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. Among the 72,461 women in our cohort, 10.1 % underwent breast MRI. Preoperative MRI use increased from 0.8 % in 2000–2001 to 25.2 % in 2008–2009 (p < 0.001). Overall, 43.3 % received mastectomy and 56.7 % received BCS. After adjustment for clinical and demographic factors, MRI was associated with an increased likelihood of having a mastectomy compared to BCS (adjusted odds ratio = 1.21, 95 % CI 1.14–1.28). Among women who underwent mastectomy, MRI was significantly associated with an increased likelihood of having bilateral cancer diagnosed (9.7 %) and undergoing bilateral mastectomy (12.5 %) compared to women without MRI (3.7 and 4.1 %, respectively, p < 0.001 for both). In conclusion, the use of preoperative breast MRI has increased substantially among older women with breast cancer and is associated with an increased likelihood of being diagnosed with bilateral cancer, and more invasive surgery.     

The use of radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery in hormonally treated breast cancer patients is dependent on patient age, geographic region, and surgeon specialty

BACKGROUND: The use of radiation therapy (RT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is inconsistent in patients treated with hormonal therapy (HT). We sought to identify factors influencing the decision to use RT in this setting. METHODS: Patients in the North American Fareston vs. Tamoxifen Adjuvant (NAFTA) trial who had BCS were evaluated for factors influencing the use of RT using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Of the 1,811 patients enrolled in the NAFTA trial, 1,222 (67.4%) had BCS. Of these, 241 (19.7%) did not have RT. There were no significant differences in tumor grade, lymphovascular invasion, estrogen receptor status, or nodal status between those who received RT and those who did not. On univariate analyses, patients who did not receive RT were more likely to be older (median 72 versus 66 years, P < .001), have larger tumors (median 1.35 versus 1.10 cm, P = .009), and be progesterone negative (18.3% versus 13.1%, P = .048). Surgeons in the West were most likely to omit RT, whereas those in the Midwest were least likely to omit it (26.7% versus 7.2%, P < .001). Surgical oncologists were more likely to omit RT after BCS than general surgeons (21.8% versus 13.7%, P < .001). Academic affiliation (P < .001), number of breast procedures performed per year (P = .017), and the percentage of breast practice (P = .019) also correlated with whether or not RT was used. On multivariate analysis, patient age (P < .001), geographic region (P = .006), and surgeon specialty (P = .027) remained significant. CONCLUSION: Patient age, geographic region, and surgeon training influence the decision to use RT after BCS in patients receiving HT.     

Medically Managed Hypercholesterolemia and Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus Preoperatively Predicts Poor Survival after Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer

Introduction

Although patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) frequently require medications to treat pre-existing conditions, the impact of these treatments on outcomes post-resection is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of preoperative medications on overall survival after pancreatic resection.

Methods

Multi-institutional data on preoperative medications and outcomes in patients undergoing resection for PDAC were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine which medications were predictive of early mortality.

Results

Of the 518 patients resected for PDAC, 13.3% were being treated preoperatively with insulin, 14.8% were on a statin, 1.7% were on steroids, and 7.6% were on thyroxin. On univariate analysis, patients taking preoperative insulin had a higher 90-day mortality rate relative to those not on insulin (13.0% vs. 4.8%, p?=?0.024), and those on a statin had a higher 90-day mortality than those who were not (10.8% vs. 4.6%, p?=?0.035). Preoperative steroids and thyroxin were not associated with 90-day mortality (p?=?0.409 and p?=?0.474, respectively). Insulin and statin use was a stronger predictor of 90-day mortality than history of diabetes (p?=?0.101), BMI????30 (p?=?0.166), cardiac disease (p?=?0.168), pulmonary disease (p?=?1.000), or renal dysfunction (p?=?1.000). Older patients also had a higher risk of early postoperative death (p?=?0.011). On multivariate analysis, only preoperative insulin usage and statin treatment independently predicted early mortality (odds ratio (OR)?=?3.043; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.256?C7.372; p?=?0.014, and OR?=?2.529; 95% CI, 1.048?C6.104; p?=?0.039, respectively). Based on the beta coefficients, a simple scoring system was devised to predict survival after resection from preoperative medication use. Zero points were assigned to patients who were on neither insulin nor a statin, one point to those who were on one or the other, and two points to those who were on both insulin and a statin. The score correlated with early postoperative survival (90-day mortality rates of 3.4%, 11.5%, and 13.3% for 0, 1, and 2 points, respectively, p?=?0.004). Increasing score was also associated with poorer long-term outcomes, with a median overall survival of 19.6, 15.6, and 11.2 months for 0, 1, and 2 points, respectively (p?=?0.002, median follow-up 14.4 months).

Conclusions

Patients with PDAC being treated for pre-existing diabetes or hypercholesterolemia with either insulin or statin-based therapy have an increased risk of early postoperative mortality. A simple scoring system based on preoperative medications can be used to predict early and overall survival following resection.