排序方式: 共有57条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
目的探讨臀沟中线小凹切除术在治疗骶尾部藏毛窦伴大范围感染中的应用。方法我院2011-09~2013-09收治骶尾部藏毛窦伴大范围感染的患者共14例,采用臀沟中线小凹切除术治疗,术中偏离中线切开引流骶尾部感染灶,逐个切除患者臀沟中线小凹后缝合伤口,术后换药至伤口愈合。评价指标包括治愈率、手术时间、住院时间、伤口愈合时间、术后伤口并发症、术后复发情况。结果 14例患者全部治愈。手术时间30-60 min,中位手术时间40 min。住院时间12-20 d,中位住院时间17 d。伤口愈合时间3-4周,中位伤口愈合时间3.5周。术后2例患者臀沟中线小凹处伤口裂开,经换药愈合。术后随访1年以上,无复发。结论臀沟中线小凹切除术是治疗骶尾部藏毛窦伴大范围感染的安全有效、微创的手术方式。 相似文献
4.
5.
6.
8.
骶尾部藏毛疾病是原发于臀沟并向上蔓延的骶尾部慢性皮下感染,常反复破溃形成窦道即藏毛窦.藏毛窦的主要治疗方法包括:苯酚注射、冷冻、切开引流搔刮、病灶整块切除等[1].北京市肛肠医院近年收治的藏毛窦患者多为外院手术治疗失败或复发者,通常窦道分支复杂,病变范围广泛,如果术后创口开放,二期愈合时间很长;另一方面,也会增加患者伤口疼痛和换药次数.2010年1月至6月我们采用改良Limberg、Dufourmentel菱形转移皮瓣成形术治疗骶尾部藏毛窦16例,取得良好效果. 相似文献
9.
10.
目的:观察深刺天枢穴治疗结肠慢传输型便秘(Slow Transit Constipation,STC)的临床疗效.方法:将120例STC患者按照2:1:1的比例,随机分为深刺组60例,电针组30例,西药组30例.深刺组采用深刺天枢穴治疗;电针组采用常规针刺天枢穴治疗;西药组采用口服乳果糖口服液治疗.评价三组患者首次自主排便时间及治疗前、治疗4星期后患者便秘评分及相关临床症状评分.结果:深刺组改善便秘临床症状评分优于电针组和西药组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01).深刺组在改善排便不成功次数及腹痛等症状上也优于其他两组,且深刺的即刻效应较好.结论:深刺天枢穴对STC临床症状的改善优于西药乳果糖和常规针刺天枢穴.Abstract: Objective:To observe the clinical effect of deep insertion at Tianshu(ST 25)for colonic slow transit constipation(STC).Methods:120 cases of STC patients were randomly divided,60 cases in a deep insertion group,30 cases in an electroacupuncture group and 30 cases in a medication group by 2:1:1 ratio.The deep insertion group was treated with deep insertion at Tianshu(ST 25).The electroacupuncture group was treated with routine insertion at Tianshu(ST 25).The medication group was treated with oral administration of Lactulose oral liquid.The first voluntary defecation time,and constipation scores before the treatment,four weeks after the treatment and relevant scores of clinical symptoms were assessed in the three groups of the patients.Results:The scores of the clinical symptoms in improvement of constipation were better in the deep insertion group than in the electroacupuncture group and medication group,with differences in statistical significance(P<0.01).The unsuccessful numbers in the improvement of defecation and abdominal pain were also better in the deep insertion group than in the other two groups,and better in instant effect in the deep insertion.Conclusion:The improvement of STC clinical symptoms was better by deep insertion at Tianshu(ST 25)than by medication and routine acupuncture method at Tianshu(ST 25). 相似文献