从六对论治谈国医大师吕仁和应用芍药经验

辨证论治是中医学治疗的特色。吕仁和教授提出的“六对论治”辨证思路，包括对病论治、对病辨证论治、对病分期辨证论治、对症论治、对症辨证论治和对症辨病与辨证论治相结合，为临床辨证提供了完善的思路。芍药为吕仁和教授临床常用中药，以其应用经验为切入点，结合病案系统介绍吕仁和教授“六对论治”学术思想。介绍将四逆散化裁，赤、白芍同用以柔肝养血、活血化瘀，针对肝气郁滞证候；以“三丹汤”中牡丹皮、丹参、赤芍同用，针对肾脏病“微型癥瘕”病机；以赤、白芍大剂量生用通便泻浊对症治疗等临床用药经验。     

张宁教授“固本泻浊法”治疗肾病综合征经验浅谈

肾病综合征是儿童和成人常见的肾脏疾病之一，激素治疗常不能达到满意的效果，并会出现多种不良反应。张宁教授运用中医治疗肾病综合征经验丰富，认为肾病综合征病性虚实夹杂，脾肾亏虚为本，肝失疏泄、湿热内阻、瘀血停滞为标。标实的病理因素由本虚引起及加重。治以“固本泻浊法”，健脾益肾，兼以调肝养血、清热化湿、活血化瘀，提高了临床疗效，减少了不良反应。     

从形气神谈溃疡性结肠炎的中西医认识

溃疡性结肠炎(Ulcerative colitis,UC)是一种病情反复、迁延难愈的炎症肠病,已被世界卫生组织列为现代难治病之一[1]。本病病因及发病机制尚不明确,西药治疗效果欠佳。近年来中医药的介入,临床取得显著疗效。西医学认为疾病是机体在一定致病因素的作用下自稳调节紊乱,经过机体内损伤和抗损伤反应的相互斗争,表现出的一系列功能。     

柴松岩学术思想在妇科临床的应用体会

柴松岩主任是全国名老中医师承导师之一，从事中医妇科临床工作50余年。临证主张辨证与辨病相结合，重视女性的生理病理特点，强调参考基础体温、结合月经周期组方遣药，注重“治未病”理念在妇科临床的应用，在继承祖国医学的基础上不断创新，并已形成自己独到的理论特色。现就在跟师期间的些许体会加以总结，以飨同道。     

多普勒组织成像技术在评价高血压左室舒张功能中的应用

目的 :应用多普勒组织成像 (DTI)技术检测二尖瓣环舒张期运动速度来评介原发性高血压左室舒张功能 ,探讨DTI的临床应用价值。方法 :2 0例原发性高血压和 2 0例年龄相似的健康者 ,应用DTI技术对二尖瓣环室间隔侧的运动速度进行测定 ,并与常规二尖瓣血流脉冲多普勒 (PW)检测结果对照分析。结果 :PW高血压组与对照组比较 ,峰值速度E、A及E/A明显低于对照组 ,差异显著 (P <0 0 1) ;DTI高血压组与对照组比较 ,峰值速度Ea、Aa及Ea/Aa明显低于对照组 ,差异非常显著 (P <0 0 0 1)。PW、DTI两组相同部位间比较 ,高血压组低于对照组。结论 :DTI技术评价高血压左室舒张功能比常规脉冲多普勒二尖瓣血流参数更敏感     

Diterpenoids from the Roots of Agastache rugosa

从土藿香根中得到两个二萜化合物，藿香酚（２）及异藿香酚（３）。经光谱解析（ＩＲ，ＵＶ，ＨＲＭＳ及ＮＭＲ谱），确定它们的结构分别为１１，１４ｄｉｈｙｄｒｏｘｙ１２ｍｅｔｈｏｘｙ１９（４→３）ａｂｅｏａｂｉｅｔａ４，（１８），８，１１，１３ｔｅｔｒａｅｎ７ｏｎｅ（２）和１１，１４ｄｉｈｙｄｒｏｘｙ１２ｍｅｔｈｏｘｙ１９（４→３）ａｂｅｏａｂｉｅｔａ３，８，１１，１３ｔｅｔｒａｅｎ７ｏｎｅ（３）藿香酚（２）为一新的化合物，而异藿香酚（３）系首次从天然界分离得到，二者为一对异构体。     

大脑后动脉交通前段及其内穿支研究

本文介绍Willis动脉环后半环大脑后动脉及其内穿支的显微解剖,大脑后动脉交通前段内穿支是脑深部的重要供血血管之一,100％的病例双侧具有该血管。     

Integrating PET and CT information to improve diagnostic accuracy for lung nodules: A semiautomatic computer-aided method.

Our objective was to develop and evaluate 3 semiautomatic computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) schemes for distinguishing between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules by use of features extracted from CT, 18F-FDG PET, and both CT and 18F-FDG PET. METHODS: We retrospectively collected 92 consecutive cases of pulmonary nodules (<3 cm) in patients who underwent both thoracic CT and whole-body PET/CT. Forty-two of the nodules were malignant and 50 benign, as confirmed by pathologic examination and clinical follow-up. The interval between CT and PET was less than 1 mo. Four clinical parameters, including patient age, sex, smoking status, and history of previous malignancy, were used for the CAD schemes. Sixteen CT features based on size, shape, margin, and internal structure of nodules were independently rated subjectively by 2 chest radiologists. Four PET features were viewed on a PET/CT workstation. CAD schemes based on clinical parameters together with CT features, PET features, and both CT and PET features were then used to differentiate benign from malignant nodules. Finally, the output from the CAD schemes was evaluated by use of receiver-operating-characteristic analysis. RESULTS: When we used clinical parameters and CT features as input units (CAD scheme 1), the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (A(z) value) of the CAD scheme was 0.83. When we used clinical parameters and PET features as input units (CAD scheme 2), the A(z) value for the computer output was 0.91. However, when we used all data as input units (CAD scheme 3), the A(z) value for the computer output was 0.95. The performance of CAD scheme 3 was better than that of CAD scheme 1 or 2. A statistically significant difference existed between the A(z) values of CAD schemes 3 and 2 (P = 0.037) and between those of CAD schemes 3 and 1 (P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Our CAD scheme based on both PET and CT was better able to differentiate benign from malignant pulmonary nodules than were the CAD schemes based on PET alone and CT alone.