Experimental study on the load bearing behavior of geosynthetic reinforced soil bridge abutments with different facing conditions

This paper presents an experimental study on reduced-scale model tests of geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) bridge abutments with modular block facing, full-height panel facing, and geosynthetic wrapped facing to investigate the influence of facing conditions on the load bearing behavior. The GRS abutment models were constructed using sand backfill and geogrid reinforcement. Test results indicate that footing settlements and facing displacements under the same applied vertical stress generally increase from full-height panel facing abutment, to modular block facing abutment, to geosynthetic wrapped facing abutment. Measured incremental vertical and lateral soil stresses for the two GRS abutments with flexible facing are generally similar, while the GRS abutment with rigid facing has larger stresses. For the GRS abutments with flexible facing, maximum reinforcement tensile strain in each layer typically occurs under the footing for the upper reinforcement layers and near the facing connections for the lower layers. For the full-height panel facing abutment, maximum reinforcement tensile strains generally occur near the facing connections.     

Numerical study on maximum reinforcement tensile forces in geosynthetic reinforced soil bridge abutments

This paper presents a numerical study of maximum reinforcement tensile forces for geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) bridge abutments. The backfill soil was characterized using a nonlinear elasto-plastic constitutive model that incorporates a hyperbolic stress-strain relationship with strain softening behavior and the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion. The geogrid reinforcement was characterized using a hyperbolic load-strain-time constitutive model. The GRS bridge abutments were numerically constructed in stages, including soil compaction effects, and then loaded in stages to the service load condition (i.e., applied vertical stress?=?200?kPa) and finally to the failure condition (i.e., vertical strain?=?5%). A parametric study was conducted to investigate the effects of geogrid reinforcement, backfill soil, and abutment geometry on reinforcement tensile forces at the service load condition and failure condition. Results indicate that reinforcement vertical spacing and backfill soil friction angle have the most significant effects on magnitudes of maximum tensile forces at the service load condition. The locus of maximum tensile forces at the failure condition was found to be Y-shaped. Geogrid reinforcement parameters have little effect on the Y-shaped locus of the maximum tensile forces when no secondary reinforcement layers are included, backfill soil shear strength parameters have moderate effects, and abutment geometry parameters have significant effects.     

Seismic performance of a whole Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil – Integrated Bridge System (GRS-IBS) in shaking table test

A scaled plane-strain shaking table test was conducted in this study to investigate the seismic performance of a Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil-Integrated Bridge System (GRS-IBS) with a full-length bridge beam resting on two GRS abutments at opposite ends subjected to earthquake motions in the longitudinal direction. This study examined the effects of different combinations of reinforcement stiffness J and spacing S_v on the seismic performance of the GRS-IBS. Test results show that reducing the reinforcement spacing was more beneficial to minimize the seismic effect on the GRS abutment as compared to increasing the reinforcement stiffness. The seismic inertial forces acted on the top of two side GRS abutments interacted with each other through the bridge beam, which led to close peak acceleration amplitudes at the locations near the bridge beam. Overall, the GRS-IBS did not experience obvious structure failure and significant displacements during and after shaking. Shaking in the longitudinal direction of the bridge beam increased the vertical stress in the reinforced soil zone. The maximum tensile forces in the upper and lower geogrid layers due to shaking happened under the center of the beam seat and at the abutment facing respectively.     

Experimental and theoretical studies on the ultimate bearing capacity of geogrid-reinforced sand

Geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) structures have gained popularity in replacing concrete rigid piles as abutments to support medium or small-spanned bridge superstructures in recent years. This study conducted 13 model tests to investigate the ultimate bearing capacity of the GRS mass when sand was used as backfill soil. The GRS mass was constructed and loaded to failure under a plane strain condition. Test results were compared with two analytical solutions available in literature. This study also proposed an analytical model for predicting the ultimate bearing capacity of the GRS mass based on the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion. The failure surface of the GRS mass was described by the Rankine failure surface. The effects of compaction and reinforcement tension were equivalent to increased confining pressures to account for the reinforcing effects of the geosynthetic reinforcement. The proposed model was verified by the results of the model tests conducted in this study and reported in literature. Results indicated that the proposed model was more capable of predicting the ultimate bearing capacity of the GRS mass than the other two analytical solutions available in literature. The proposed model can be used to predict the ultimate bearing capacity of GRS structures when sand was used as backfill material. In addition, a parametric study was conducted to investigate the effects of friction angle of backfill soil, reinforcement spacing, reinforcement strength, and reinforcement stiffness on the ultimate bearing capacity of the GRS mass calculated with and without compaction effects. Results showed that the ultimate bearing capacity of the GRS mass was significantly affected by the friction angle of backfill soil, reinforcement spacing and strength. Compaction effects resulted in an increase in the ultimate bearing capacity of the GRS mass.     

A method for correcting field strain measurements to account for temperature effects

Measurements of deformation and strain are of critical importance for the structural health monitoring of geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) structures. For some commonly used wiring configurations and sensors, field strain measurements can exhibit apparent strains that are caused by changes in wire temperature or changes in gauge temperature, which do not correspond to changes in actual strain in the geosynthetic. Correcting for these effects is important for separating out real structural behavior from wiring and sensor issues, and is imperative for avoiding false trigger warnings in automated instrumentation reporting systems. The current paper consequently presents a method for correcting field strain measurements to account for temperature effects. Data collected from sensors embedded in a heavily-instrumented GRS abutment over a two-year monitoring period is presented. The distributed thermistor array embedded in the GRS abutment is shown to be particularly useful for understanding temperature effects on the measured foil strain gauge data. The presented approach and associated framework for data correction are useful for practicing engineers and other researchers, as the general concepts from this study can be applied to data collected from many instrumented geosynthetic field projects.     

Numerical parametric study of geosynthetic reinforced soil integrated bridge system (GRS-IBS)

A 2-D finite flement model was developed in this study to conduct a FE parametric study on the effects of some variables in the performance of geosynthetic reinforced soil integrated bridge system (GRS-IBS). The variables investigated in this study include the effect of internal friction angle of backfill material, width of reinforced soil foundation (RSF), secondary reinforcement within bearing bed, setback distance, bearing width and length of reinforcement. Other important parameters such as reinforcement stiffness and spacing were previously investgated by the authors. The performance of GRS-IBS were investgated in terms of lateral facing displacement, strain distribution along reinforcement, and location of potential failure zone. The results showed that the internal friction angle of backfill material has a significant impact on the performance of GRS-IBS. The secondary reinforcement, setback distance, and bearing width have low impact on the performance of GRS-IBS. However, it was found that the width of RSF and length of reinforcement have negligible effect on the performance of GRS-IBS. Finally, the potential failure envelope of the GRS-IBS abutment was found to be a combination of punching shear failure envelope (top) that starts under the inner edge of strip footing and extends vertically downward to intersect with Rankine active failure envelope (bottom).     

Effect of subgrade soil stiffness on the design of geosynthetic tube

Water or soil filled geotextile or geosynthetic tubes have been used for coastal or river protection projects in recent years. How to design and analyze geosynthetic tube is still an important research topic. Although a number of solutions for geosynthetic tube have been proposed in the past, most of these solutions assume that the geosynthetic tube is resting on a rigid foundation. In this paper, a two-dimensional analysis of geosynthetic tube resting on deformable foundation soil is presented. The deformable foundation is assumed to be an elastic Winkler type represented by the modulus of subgrade reaction, K_f. The study shows that the smaller the modulus, the smaller the height of the geosynthetic tube above the ground surface and the higher the tensile force in the geotextile or geosynthetic given the other conditions the same. When the foundation soil has a modulus higher than 1000 kPa/m which is representative of soft clay, the foundation soil can be assumed to be rigid in the analysis. The results obtained from the method proposed in this paper are compared with those from the solutions of Leshchinsky et al. and Plaut and Suherman for verification. The differences between the solutions are also discussed.     

Remedial treatment of soil structures using geosynthetic-reinforcing technology

The advantages of geosynthetic-reinforcing technology to construct new soil structures including; (a) a relatively short construction period; (b) small construction machines necessary; and (c) a higher stability of completed structures, all contributing to a higher cost-effectiveness, are addressed. A number of case successful histories of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls have been reported in the literature (e.g., [Tatsuoka, F., Koseki, J., Tateyama, M., 1997a. Performance of Earth Reinforcement Structures during the Great Hanshin Earthquake, Special Lecture. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Earth Reinforcement, IS Kyushu ‘96, Balkema, vol. 2, pp. 973–1008; Tatsuoka, F., Tateyama, M, Uchimura, T., Koseki, J., 1997b. Geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls as important permanent structures, 1996–1997 Mercer Lecture. Geosynthetics International 4(2), 81–136; Tatsuoka, F., Koseki, J., Tateyama, M., Munaf, Y., Horii, N., 1998. Seismic stability against high seismic loads of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining structures, Keynote Lecture. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Geosynthetics, Atlanta, vol. 1, pp.103–142; Helwany, S.M.B., Wu, J.T.H., Froessl, B., 2003. GRS bridge abutments—an effective means to alleviate bridge approach settlement. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 21(3), 177–196; Lee, K.Z.Z., Wu, J.T.H., 2004. A synthesis of case histories on GRS bridge-supporting structures with flexible facing. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 22(4), 181–204; Yoo, C., Jung, H.-S., 2004. Measured behavior of a geosynthetic-reinforced segmental retaining wall in a tiered configuration. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 22(5), 359–376; Kazimierowicz-Frankowska, K., 2005. A case study of a geosynthetic reinforced wall with wrap-around facing. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 23(1), 107–115; Skinner, G.D., Rowe, R.K., 2005. Design and behaviour of a geosynthetic reinforced retaining wall and bridge abutment on a yielding foundation. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 23(3), 234–260]). Techniques for analyzing the seismic response of reinforced walls and slopes have also been developed (e.g. Nouri, H. Fakher, A., Jones, C.J.F.P., 2006. Development of horizontal slice method for seismic stability analysis of reinforced slopes and walls. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 24(2),175–187). Several typical cases in which embankments having a gentle slope and conventional-type soil retaining walls that were seriously damaged or failed were reconstructed to geosynthetic-reinforced steepened slopes or geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls are also reported in this paper. It has been reported that the reconstruction of damaged or failed conventional soil structures to geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures was highly cost-effective in these cases. Rehabilitation of an old earth-fill dam in Tokyo to increase its seismic stability by constructing a counter-balance fill reinforced with geosynthetic reinforcement is described. Finally, a new technology proposed to stabilize the downstream slope of earth-fill dams against overflowing flood water while ensuring a high seismic stability by protecting the slope with soil bags anchored with geosynthetic reinforcement layers arranged in the slope is described.     

Numerical evaluation of the performance of a Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil-Integrated Bridge System (GRS-IBS) under different loading conditions

This paper presents the results of a finite element (FE) numerical analysis that was developed to simulate the fully-instrumented Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Integrated Bridge System (GRS-IBS) at the Maree Michel Bridge in Louisiana. Four different loading conditions were considered in this paper to evaluate the performance of GRS-IBS abutment due to dead loading, tandem axle truck loading, service loading, and abnormal loading. The two-dimensional FE computer program PLAXIS 2D 2016 was selected to model the GRS-IBS abutment. The hardening soil model proposed by Schanz et al., (1999) that was initially introduced by Duncan and Chang (1970) was used to simulate the granular backfill materials; a linear-elastic model with Mohr-Coulomb frictional criterion was used to simulate the interface between the geosynthetic and backfill material. Both the geosynthetic and the facing block were modeled using linear elastic model. The Mohr-Coulomb constitutive model was used to simulate the foundation soil. The FE numerical results were compared with the field measurements of monitoring program, in which a good agreement was obtained between the FE numerical results and the field measurements. The range of maximum reinforcement strain was between 0.4% and 1.5%, depending on the location of the reinforcement layer and the loading condition. The maximum lateral deformation at the face was between 2 and 9 mm (0.08%–0.4% lateral strain), depending on the loading condition. The maximum settlement of the GRS-IBS under service loading was 10 mm (0.3% vertical strain), which is about two times the field measurements (～5 mm). This is most probably due to the behavior of over consolidated soil caused by the old bridge. The axial reinforcement force predicted by FHWA (Adams et al., 2011b) design methods were 1.5–2.5 times higher than those predicted by the FE analysis and the field measurements, depending on the loading condition and reinforcement location. However, the interface shear strength between the reinforcement and the backfill materials predicted by Mohr-Coulomb method was very close to those predicted by the FE.     

Experimental evaluation of the effect of compaction near facing on the behavior of GRS walls

Experimental studies have been carried out to evaluate the effect of the compaction condition at the back of block facing on the behavior of geosynthetic reinforced soil (GRS) walls. Three GRS walls with 1.2?m high were constructed at the COPPE/UFRJ Geotechnical Laboratory. The walls were well-instrumented in order to monitor the values of the reinforcement load, toe horizontal load, horizontal facing displacement, horizontal stress at the back of the block facing, and vertical displacement on the top of the walls. The behavior of the walls has been investigated at the end of construction and during the surcharge application (post-construction). At the end of the loading, the toes of the walls were gradually released to also verify the influence of the different toe restraints. The results clearly show the effect and call attention to the importance of the compaction conditions near the facing on the behavior of GRS walls.     

Numerical study of geosynthetic reinforced soil bridge abutment performance under static and seismic loading considering effects of bridge deck

Although the use of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) bridge abutments has been increasing, the seismic performance of such structures has remained a significant concern due to their unknown behavior in load-bearing and stress distribution under bridge load and seismic conditions simultaneously. This paper investigates the static and dynamic response of GRS bridge abutment. A series of numerical models representing the realistic field conditions of these structures, including two reinforced soil walls and a single span deck that restrains the top of walls, rather than equivalent surcharge load, was developed. The calibrated numerical model in FLAC program was used to evaluate the effects of horizontal restraint from the deck on the GRS wall displacements and reinforcement loads at the end of construction and under harmonic base acceleration up to 0.5 g. Results indicated that the restraint mobilized from the bridge deck presence, considerably affected the results at both the end of construction and after the dynamic load was applied. Moreover, a series of the parametric studies were performed to investigate the influences of backfill soil relative compaction, reinforcement stiffness, reinforcement length, and reinforcement vertical spacing on the response of GRS abutments at the end of construction and post dynamic state.     

Numerical study of the impact of climate conditions on stability of geocomposite and geogrid reinforced soil walls

Geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) walls using marginal soils can operate under unsaturated conditions depending on climate conditions and drainage inside the reinforced zone. Geocomposite reinforcements have been suggested to act as internal drainage layers, but their hydraulic behavior can also be strongly affected by climate conditions. Numerical analyses were conducted to observe the impact of four distinct tropical climate conditions (arid, semi-arid, humid subtropical and humid tropical) on suction profiles and stability of reinforced soil walls constructed using geogrid and geocomposite reinforcements. The climate simulation involved the incorporation of a soil-atmosphere interaction on water balance and on the unsaturated transient infiltration. Results indicate the GRS walls can operate under relatively high suction levels under arid climates in which cumulative evaporation overcomes infiltration. Any climate that has rainy seasons with consecutive rainfalls with intensities close to the infiltration capacity of soil and/or monthly cumulative precipitation higher than 200 mm/day led to critical conditions in terms of soil water saturation and stability. Under unsaturated conditions of soil, the drainage effectiveness of geocomposites is significantly reduced and adverse capillary break effects become critical.     

软土地基的桥涵设计

介绍了软土地基桥涵病害的症状,从桥台设计、桥台软基处理、涵洞软基设计等方面探讨了软土地基桥涵设计的有关注意事项和病害治理对策,为广大桥梁工作者提供了参考。     

Applied bearing pressure beneath a reinforced soil foundation used in a geosynthetic reinforced soil integrated bridge system

Geosynthetic reinforced soil integrated bridge system (GRS-IBS) design guidelines recommend the use of a reinforced soil foundation (RSF) to support the dead loads that are applied by the reinforced soil abutment and bridge superstructure, as well as any live loads that are applied by traffic on the bridge or abutment. The RSF is composed of high-quality granular fill material that is compacted and encapsulated within a geotextile fabric. Current GRS-IBS interim implementation design guidelines recommend the use of design methodologies for bearing capacity that are based around rigid foundation behavior, which yield a trapezoidal applied pressure distribution that is converted to a uniform applied pressure that acts over a reduced footing width for purposes of analysis. Recommended methods for determining the applied pressure distribution beneath the RSF for settlement analyses follow conventional methodologies for assessing the settlement of spread footings, which typically assume uniformly applied pressures beneath the base of the foundation that are distributed to the underlying soil layers in a fashion that can reasonably be modeled with an elastic-theory approach. Field data collected from an instrumented GRS-IBS that was constructed over a fine-grained soil foundation indicates that the RSF actually behaves in a fairly flexible way under load, yielding an applied pressure distribution that is not uniform or trapezoidal, and which is significantly different than what conventional GRS-IBS design methodologies assume. This paper consequently presents an empirical approach to determining the applied pressure distribution beneath the RSF in GRS-IBS construction. This empirical approach is a useful first step for researchers, as it draws important attention to this issue, and provides a framework for collecting meaningful field data on future projects which accurately capture real GRS-IBS foundation behavior.     

Shaking table tests on geosynthetic encased columns in soft clay

This paper presents the results of an experimental research on the behavior of geosynthetic encased stone columns and ordinary stone columns embedded in soft clay under dynamic base shaking. For this purpose, a novel laminar box is designed and developed to run a total of eight sets of 1-G shaking table tests on four different model soil profiles: Soft clay bed, ordinary stone column installed clay bed, and clay beds with geosynthetic encased columns with two different reinforcement stiffnesses. The geosynthetic encased columns are heavily instrumented with strain rosettes to quantify the reinforcement strains developing under the action of dynamic loads. The responses of the columns are studied through the deformation modes of the encased columns and the magnitude and distribution of reinforcement strains under dynamic loading. The response of the granular inclusion enhanced soft subsoil and embankment soil and the identification of the dynamic soil properties of the entire soil body are also discussed in this article. Finally, to determine the effect of dynamic loading on the vertical load carrying capacity, stress-controlled column load tests are undertaken both on seismically loaded and undisturbed columns.     

Load-bearing performance of model GRS bridge abutments with different facing and reinforcement spacing configurations

The paper reports the construction and surcharge load-testing of three (3) large-scale (~2.50 m-tall) GRS bridge abutment models in an outdoor test station to investigate the influences that the facing type and reinforcement spacing could have on their load-bearing performance. The facing types examined included cored Concrete Masonry Units (CMU) in Model #1 and much larger solid concrete blocks in Models #2 and #3. Reinforcement spacing in the first two models was 0.20 m, whereas it was increased to 0.30 m in the third model. Results show that using large facing blocks in GRS abutments could lead to significant improvements in their load-deformation performance relative to those with the CMU facing alternative. This improvement was observed even in the case of model with increased reinforcement spacing. Therefore, use of larger facing blocks could also help reduce the cost of GRS abutments by reducing the need for tighter reinforcement.     

Performance monitoring of Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Integrated Bridge System (GRS-IBS) in Louisiana

The Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil (GRS) Integrated Bridge System (IBS) is an alternative design method to the conventional bridge support technology. Closely spaced layers of geosynthetic reinforcement and compacted granular fill material can provide direct bearing support for structural bridge members if designed and constructed properly. This new technology has a number of advantages including reduced construction time and cost, generally fewer construction difficulties, and easier maintenance over the life cycle of the structure. These advantages have led to a significant increase in the rate of construction of GRS-IBS structures in recent years. This paper presents details on the instrumentation plan, short-term behavior monitoring, and experiences gained from the implementation of the first GRS-IBS project in Louisiana. The monitoring program consisted of measuring bridge deformations, settlements, strains along the reinforcement, vertical and horizontal stresses within the abutment, and pore water pressures. In this paper, the performance of instrumentation sensors was evaluated to improve future instrumentation programs. Measurements from the instrumentations also provide valuable information to evaluate the design procedure and the performance of GRS-IBS bridges. The instrumentation readings showed that the magnitude and distribution of strains along the reinforcements vary with depth. The locus of maximum strains in the abutment varied by the surcharge load and time that did not corresponds to the (45+?/2) line, especially after the placement of steel girders. A comparison was made between the measured and theoretical value of thrust forces on the facing wall. The results indicated that the predicted loads by the bin pressure theory were close to the measured loads in the lower level of abutment. However, the bin pressure theory under predicted the thrust loads in the upper layers with reduced reinforcement spacing. In general, the overall performance of the GRS-IBS was within acceptable tolerance in terms of measured strains, stresses, settlements and deformations.     

土工格栅加筋土柔性桥台结构性能的试验研究

基于静载作用下加筋土柔性桥台结构工作性能的试验研究,综合对比分析桥台基础距下部挡墙面板的距离D对柔性桥台结构极限承载力、下部挡墙变形特点、筋材应变和土压力的影响。试验结果表明：当下部加筋挡墙中筋材长度为整体桥台高度时,桥台结构极限承载力随偏移距离D增加呈现先增加后减小趋势,且在D为0.4H_L(H_L为下部挡墙高度)时达到最大值;加筋柔性桥台整体结构加载至破坏前一级载荷时,桥台基础沉降与台背加筋土顶部沉降均呈近似线性变化,且D/H_L为0.4时二者差异沉降最小;挡墙面板顶部的水平位移明显大于中、底部,且挡墙水平位移与挡墙高度比值均小于1%;挡墙中各层筋材应变最大值随D增加而逐渐向远离面板方向发展,且D为0.4H_L时台背加筋土和下部挡墙加筋中筋材的应变相差不大,整体柔性桥台结构工作性能达到最佳状态。     

刚性桩在桥台后深厚软土地基处理中的应用

结合宁波地区典型软土特征，研究了刚性桩在不同桩长条件下，对桥台后深厚软土地基处理的处置效果，探讨了刚性桩数值分析方法，对深厚软土地区桥台后的软土地基设计施工提供了有益的指导。     

Consolidation of soft clay foundation improved by geosynthetic-reinforced granular columns: Numerical evaluation

Soft clays are problematic soils as they present high compressibility and low shear strength. There are several methods for improving in situ conditions of soft clays. Based on the geotechnical problem's geometry and characteristics, the in situ conditions may require reinforcement to restrain instability and construction settlements. Granular columns reinforced by geosynthetic material are widely used to reduce settlements of embankments on soft clays. They also accelerate the consolidation rate by reducing the drainage path's length and increasing the foundation soil's bearing capacity. In this study, the performance of encased and layered granular columns in soft clay is investigated and discussed. The numerical results show the significance of geosynthetic stiffness and the column length on the embankment settlements. Furthermore, the results show that granular columns may play an important role in dissipating the excess pore water pressures and accelerating the consolidation settlements of embankments on soft clays.