关节镜下单束重建治疗前交叉韧带部分断裂的临床研究

目的探讨关节镜下单束重建治疗前叉韧带部分断裂的临床疗效及手术方法。方法回顾性分析2007年6月至2009年10月关节镜下应用单束重建治疗前叉韧带部分断裂12例患者的资料。12例患者中,男9例,女3例,平均年龄37岁。根据IKDC、Lysholm膝关节功能评分进行功能恢复评估。结果 12例患者平均随访13个月,所有患者术后均无感染。术后最后一次随访时Lachman试验（﹢）、前抽屉实验（-）2例,其他患者前抽屉试验、Lachman试验均为阴性。11例膝关节屈伸活动度正常,1例膝关节伸直缺失10°,IKDC评级：11例正常,1例接近正常。术前IKDC主观评分（48.33±12.77）,Lysholm膝关节功能评分（55.42±15.01）;术后末次随访IKDC主观评分（91.42±4.94）,Lysholm膝关节功能评分（95.33±6.02）,差异有统计学意义（P〈0.01）。结论关节镜下单束单隧道重建治疗前叉韧带部分断裂的短期临床疗效满意,保留残存纤维束重建虽然有一定难度,但手术在熟练的关节镜技术下可以顺利施行。     

保留并牵张残留纤维的前十字韧带双束重建术

目的 评估在亚急性期进行保留并牵张残留纤维的前十字韧带双束重建的临床效果.方法 2006年1月至2006年6月,对56例前十字韧带损伤患者在亚急性期进行保留并牵张残留纤维的前十字韧带双束重建.前十字韧带双束重建采用四隧道八股肌腱移植的方法.使用PDS缝线穿缝胫骨侧残留纤维,经深束股骨隧道牵张固定.使用IKDC及Lysholm评分标准评估疗效.结果 53例随访2年以上.末次随访时所有患者Lachman试验均为阴性.屈膝25°KT-1000检测结果显示双侧膝关节松弛度差值为(-0.44±1.53)mm,与术前(8.01±1.83)mm比较差异有统计学意义(t=37.03,P=0.0001).29例(54.7%)双侧膝关节松弛度差值小于0mm,提示患膝相对于健侧更为稳定或紧张.24例(45.3%)双侧膝关节松弛度差值为0～2mm.所有患者轴移试验均阴性.48例膝关节活动度正常,2例有5°屈曲受限,1例有小于5°屈曲受限,2例有5°过伸受限.根据IKDC评估标准,51例(96.2%)正常,2例(3.8%)接近正常.IKDC主观评分为(95.6±3.1)分,Lysholm评分为(94.8±2.9)分.受伤前Tegner评分平均为7.3分,末次随访时为7.1分.结论 根据2年以上随访结果,以IKDC为评估标准,保留并牵张残留纤维的前十字韧带双束重建能够使96.2%的患者恢复正常,3.8%的患者接近正常.     

关节镜下半腱肌腱和股薄肌腱双隧道重建前十字韧带

目的探讨关节镜下联合应用半腱肌腱和股薄肌腱重建前十字韧带(anteriorcruciateligament,ACL)的方法及疗效。方法回顾自1998年4月～2000年5月在关节镜下联合应用半腱肌腱和股薄肌腱重建ACL的患者12例。于ACL前内侧束和后外侧束的附着部分别钻直径4.5mm的隧道,用半腱肌腱重建前内侧束,股薄肌腱重建后外侧束,保留半腱肌腱和股薄肌腱的附着点,在股骨隧道外口将半腱肌腱和股薄肌腱打结固定,不行内固定。所有患者术前及术后18个月行膝关节屈曲30°、60°、90°前抽屉试验,Lysholm评分方法评定膝关节功能。结果术后随访18～43个月,平均26个月。术前所有患者前抽屉试验均为阳性,术后9例阴性,2例屈膝30°位阳性,1例屈膝30°、60°位阳性。术前Lysholm评分为40～58分,平均50.5分,手术后18个月为62～92分,平均85分,总优良率为91.7%。结论应用半腱肌腱和股薄肌腱联合重建ACL,术后膝关节动态稳定性好,疗效满意。     

胫骨-股骨单隧道双束解剖重建前交叉韧带

目的探讨胫骨-股骨单隧道双束重建前交叉韧带（ACL）的近期临床效果。方法对本组2009年4月至2011年4月收治的46例ACL损伤患者进行胫骨-股骨单隧道双束解剖重建ACL,先后钻取胫骨、股骨隧道,屈膝120。由前内侧入路建立股骨隧道,之后引入双束同种异体肌腱（或自体肌腱）,肌腱胫骨端、股骨端（沿肌腱间打入钉鞘形成双束）固定,术后随访,按照IKDC和Lysholm膝关节评分标准评价疗效。结果所有患者均获得1年以上随访。最后随访时,所有患者前抽屉试验阴性,45例患者（97．8％）Lachman试验阴性,1例患者Lachman试验I度阳性。KT-1000检查显示双侧膝关节前向松弛度差值平均为（-0．47±1．39）mm,手术前后有统计学差异（t=36．07,P〈0．01）;其中30例（65．2％）〈0mm,即患侧关节稳定度高于健侧;15例（32．6％）为0～2mm;1例（2．1％）〉2mm。所有患者轴移试验检查均为阴性。活动度检查发现42例伸屈活动度均正常,1例有5。屈膝欠缺,1例患者有10。屈膝欠缺,2例有5。过伸欠缺。从膝关节稳定性方面分析,45例（97．8％）IKDC评级为正常,1例（2．2％）评级为接近正常。综合分析,44例（95．7％）IKDC评级正常,2例（4．3％）为接近正常。术后IKDC膝关节主观评分为（94．9±3．7）分,Lysholm评分为（93．71±3．3）分。受伤前Tegner评分平均为7．3分,最后随访时为6．9分。结论对膝关节ACL断裂患者施行胫骨一股骨单隧道双束解剖重建,能够建立具有高度稳定性的膝关节,使所有患者获得IKDC评级正常或者接近正常的结果。     

Die Zwei-Bündel-Technik – eine anatomische Rekonstruktion des vorderen Kreuzbandes

OBJECTIVE: To improve the rotational stability of the knee by anatomic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament by socalled double-bundle technique using anteromedial and posterolateral grafts from native semitendinosus and gracilis. The grafts are fixed with bioabsorbable screws utilizing aperture fixation. INDICATIONS: Complete tear of the anterior cruciate ligament with positive Lachman sign and pivot shift. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Open growth plate. Osteoarthritis > grade 1 according to J?ger & Wirth. Age > or = 50 years with low sports activity (relative contraindication). SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Graft harvest of the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons via a 3-cm horizontal skin incision parallel to pes anserinus and preparation of the tendons as double-looped grafts. Arthroscopy, resection of the stump of the anterior cruciate ligament, and clearance of its origin and insertion. Tunnel placement by means of aiming devices in the following order: tibial posterolateral, tibial anteromedial, femoral anteromedial (transtibial or via the anteromedial portal in 120 degrees flexion), and femoral posterolateral (via additional medial arthroscopic portal). The anteromedial (semitendinosus tendon) and posterolateral (gracilis tendon) bundles are passed through the tunnels and fixed on the femoral side. Tibial fixation of the graft by bioresorbable interference screw with knee flexion of 45 degrees (anteromedial) and 10 degrees (posterolateral). POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Depending on the degree of swelling, rehabilitation with partial weight bearing for 14 days and full range of motion. Return to sports after 6 months, no contact sports until 9 months. RESULTS: From May 2004 to June 2005, anatomic double-bundle reconstruction was performed in 19 patients (13 male, six female, average age 31 years [18-48 years]) with isolated anterior cruciate ligament rupture without concomitant lesions. Clinical follow-up examination on average at 21.3 months (16-30 months) postoperatively. The Lysholm Score improved from an average of 65.2 to 94.5 points (75-100 points). The IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) Score yielded nine very good and ten good results in the relevant subgroups of motion, effusion and ligament stability. Measurement of anteroposterior translation with the KT-1000 instrument at 134 N showed increased translation of 1.8 mm (-2 to 5 mm) compared to the contralateral knee.     

A prospective randomised study of anatomical single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system

We conducted a prospective randomised study of anatomical single-bundle (A-SB group) versus double-bundle (A-DB group) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using the hamstrings tendons. Twenty patients with unilateral ACL deficiency were randomised into two groups. We created the bone tunnels at the position of the original insertion of the anteromedial bundle footprint and posterolateral bundle footprint in the A-DB group and at the central position between these two bundles in the A-SB group. All of the patients were tested before ACL reconstruction and one year after surgery. The KT-1000 measurements, isokinetic muscle peak torque and heel-height difference were evaluated and the general knee condition was assessed by Lysholm score. For pre- and postoperative stability assessment, we used the six-degrees-of-freedom of knee kinematic measurement system using an electromagnetic device (the EMS) for quantitative assessment during the Lachman test and the pivot shift test. There were no significant differences in the KT-1000 measurements, isokinetic muscle peak torque, heel-height difference, and Lysholm score at one-year follow-up between these two groups. The EMS data showed there were significant differences in the acceleration of the pivot shift test between the operated knee and the contralateral normal knees in the A-SB group. In conclusion, clinical outcomes were equally good in both groups. However, the EMS data showed the anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction tended to be biomechanically superior to the single-bundle reconstruction.     

关节镜下单隧道双束异体胫前肌腱重建前交叉韧带

目的探讨关节镜下单隧道双束异体胫前肌腱解剖重建前交叉韧带（anterior cruciate ligament,ACL）的方法和早期疗效。方法采用关节镜下单隧道前内侧束与后外侧束双束异体胫前肌腱解剖重建ACL31例,屈膝60°拉紧固定。结果31例随访12-20个月,平均16．2个月。术后前抽屉试验、Lachman试验及轴移试验全部阴性。IKDC评分术前（D级22例,C级9例）与术后早期（A级28例,B级3例）相比较,差异有统计学意义（χ2=9,027,P〈0．05）;术前及术后Lysholm膝关节功能评分分别为61．3±7．2和91．6±4．3,差异有统计学意义（t=-11．462,P〈0．05）。结论关节镜下单隧道双束异体胫前肌腱重建ACL能恢复原有的解剖学特点及生物力学特性,操作简单,近期疗效满意。     

Single Femoral Socket Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Tibialis Anterior Tendon: Description of a New Technique

The native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has been shown to consist of 2 functional bundles with independent behavior throughout range of knee motion. Conventional arthroscopic ACL reconstruction techniques selectively recreate the anteromedial bundle of the native ACL only. Numerous studies have reported the failure to restore normal knee kinematics in an ACL-deficient knee using a single-bundle reconstruction. It has been suggested that by reconstructing both the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the ACL, more normal knee kinematics may be achieved. Several authors have described surgical techniques to recreate the 2 functional bundles and they range from using 2 femoral tunnels to using a single femoral tunnel with the other bundle passed over the top. This article describes a new technique of recreating the 2 functional bundles of the ACL with tibialis anterior tendon allograft using a single femoral socket.     

膝关节前交叉韧带胫骨止点的软组织解剖标记

背景：膝关节前交叉韧带（ACL）重建时,胫骨骨道定位不准会产生重建韧带与髁间窝的撞击或起不到维持膝关节稳定性的作用。因此,确定ACL胫骨止点的位置非常重要。目的：研究膝关节ACL胫骨止点前内束（AMB）和后外束（PLB）与软组织标记后交叉韧带（PCL）和外侧半月板前角的距离,从而明确ACL胫骨止点在胫骨平台的位置,为ACL损伤双束重建提供理论支持。方法：解剖18个膝关节尸体标本（左膝10个,右膝8个）,测量ACL中点、AMB中点、PLB中点与PCL和外侧半月板前角的距离,并分析左、右膝关节是否存在差异。结果：AMB中点与PCL和外侧半月板前角的距离分别为（15.00±3.97）mm和（19.78±4.10）mm;PLB中点与两者的距离分别为（10.17±5.56）mm和（19.50±4.40）mm;ACL中点与两者的距离分别为（12.67±4.52）mm和（19.61±3.87）mm。左右膝关节ACL中点、AMB中点、PLB中点与软组织解剖标记的距离无明显统计学差异。结论：膝关节ACL损伤行手术重建时,可采用PCL和外侧半月板前角作为定位标记。     

Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with split Achilles allograft and single tibia tunnel for small ACL tibial footprint : technical note with clinical results

Purpose

We describe a surgical technique of double-bundle ACL reconstruction with a single tibia tunnel and report the clinical outcome.

Methods

The Achilles tendon portion was split longitudinally into two separate bundles, namely, an anteromedial (AM) bundle with 7–8 mm diameter and a posterolateral (PL) bundle with 4–6 mm diameter. The central portion of the calcaneal bone plug was prepared with a diameter of 10 mm and a length of 30 mm. For the femoral tunnel preparation, we preferred inside out target through an accessory anteromedial portal for an approach to native ACL footprint and outside in reaming through separate incision on the lateral aspect of distal thigh to prevent cartilage injury of medial femoral condyle. 10 mm diameter of single tibia tunnel was prepared at the central portion of ACL tibial footprint. After graft passage from tibia to femoral side, fixation of calcaneal bone plug within the tibia tunnel was performed using two bioabsorbable cross pins. Then, AM bundle was first fixed at 45° of flexion while the PL bundle was fixed at 10° of flexion using bioabsorbable interference screws and augmented staples. Clinical results of 22 patients (18 males and 4 females, average age 30.7 years) who underwent double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with this technique were evaluated.

Results

At an average follow-up of 30 months, there was significant improvement of the Lysholm knee score, the 2,000 IKDC subjective knee score, the median Tegner activity score and the side-to-side difference. According to the 2,000 IKDC knee examination form, the grade rated as normal in seven patients, nearly normal in 14 patients and abnormal in one patient at the latest follow-up. There were no postoperative complications and revisional surgeries.

Conclusions

Split Achilles allograft and single tibia tunnel technique for double-bundle ACL reconstruction can be an alternative option for patients with small tibial insertion sites.

Level of evidence

Level IV, therapeutic study.     

前交叉韧带重建术后膝关节位置觉和运动觉的早期观察研究

目的观察关节镜下自体胭绳肌腱单双束重建前交叉韧带患者术后早期膝关节位置觉和运动觉的恢复情况,并比较有无差异。方法50例单侧前交叉韧带损伤后重建患者非随机分为两组,单束重建组26例,双束重建组24例,移植物均为自体胭绳肌腱;正常对照组12例。术后对患者进行KT2000关节测量,膝关节被动位置重现和运动感知阈值测量,同时对其IKDC2000膝关节主观功能评分和Lysholm膝关节评分进行观察;对照组进行双侧膝关节被动位置重现和运动感知闽值测量。结果比较两组病例术后膝关节的前向稳定性和功能评分以及位置觉和运动觉结果,差异均无统计学意义（P〉0．05）;两病例组与正常对照组相比较,位置觉和运动觉结果差异均有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论前交叉韧带重建术后早期患者膝关节的位置觉和运动觉并未恢复到正常水平;前交叉韧带单束重建术和双束重建术患者术后早期膝关节位置觉和运动觉恢复水平并无差异。     

关节镜下前交叉韧带袖套状保残重建的临床效果

目的:观察袖套状保留残端的关节镜下前交叉韧带重建的临床效果。方法:收集2012年1月至2014年12月于骨科就诊的42例前交叉韧带损伤患者,其中男17例,女25例,平均年龄28.4岁,平均受伤时间5.5周(2~12周)。采用关节镜下重建前交叉韧带,同时保留胫骨侧韧带残端,通过滑膜袖套恢复残端张力。治疗前及治疗后2、6、12个月采用Lachman试验、前抽屉试验对稳定性进行评价,术后12个月采用Lysholm评分和Tegner运动分级评价膝关节功能。治疗前和治疗后12个月行膝关节MRI检查。结果:术后2、6、12个月Lachman试验、前抽屉试验均为阴性。术前Lysholm评分37.8±7.1,Tegner评分2.1±0.4;术后12个月的Lysholm评分96.8±6.1,Tegner评分6.2±0.9,均高于术前。术后12个月复查MRI显示前交叉韧带显影良好。结论:关节镜下前交叉韧带袖套状保残重建可以获得良好的临床效果。     

Application of a computerised navigation technique to assist arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Purpose

Based on biomechanical cadaver studies, anatomical double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was introduced to achieve better stability in the knee, particularly in respect of rotatory loads. Previously, the success of ACL reconstruction was believed to be mainly dependent on correct positioning of the graft, irrespective of the number of bundles for which computer-assisted surgery was developed to avoid malpositioning of the tunnel. The aim of this study was to compare rotational and translational stability after computer-navigated standard single-bundle and anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Methods

The authors investigated 42 consecutive patients who had undergone the single-bundle or double-bundle ACL reconstruction procedure using autogenous hamstring tendon grafts and ENDOBUTTON fixation in patients who had been followed up for a minimum of 24 months. Post-operative anteroposterior and rotational laxity was measured with the KT3000 and compared between groups.

Results

Both surgical procedures significantly improve rotational and translational stability compared to the preoperative ACL-deficient knee (P<0.05). No significant differences were registered between groups with regard to anteroposterior displacement of the tibia. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores were significantly higher in the double-bundle group. However, the results were excellent in both groups.

Conclusions

The use of computer-assisted ACL reconstruction, which is a highly accurate method of graft placement, could be useful for inexperienced surgeons to avoid malposition. Long-term results of at least five years are needed to determine whether double-bundle ACL reconstruction, which was associated with improved rotational laxity and significantly better IKDC and Lysholm scores compared to the standard single-bundle ACL reconstruction procedure, exerts an influence in terms of avoiding osteoarthritis or meniscus degeneration.     

保留残端半腱肌和股薄肌双股双隧道解剖重建前交叉韧带的临床研究

目的探讨关节镜下半腱肌股薄肌保留残端双股双隧道解剖重建前交叉韧带(ACL)的疗效。方法回顾自2006年1月～2008年1月,本组在关节镜下联合应用半腱肌腱和股薄肌腱双股双隧道重建ACL患者20例其中男18例,女2例,年龄17～46岁(平均31.5岁)。取腱器分别切取半腱肌、股薄肌编织成股,保留前叉韧带在股骨、胫骨的附着点残端,于ACL前内侧束和后外侧束附着部分别钻隧道,用半腱肌腱重建前内侧束,股薄肌腱重建后外侧束,以enderbutton悬吊固定股骨端,挤压螺钉固定胫骨端肌腱。所有患者术前及术后12个月行前抽屉试验、Lachman试验、Lysholm评分方法评定膝关节功能。结果术后随访14～48个月,平均31个月。术前患者前抽屉试验均为阳性,Lachman试验阳性13例,术后前抽屉试验3例屈膝60°位阳性,1例屈膝30°位阳性,其余均转阴性。5例Lachman试验仍阳性,但患者术后无膝关节不稳。2例患者术后胫骨前伤口瘢痕红肿凸起,给予切开引流后良好愈合。用Lysholm膝关节功能评分法评定术后疗效,术前评分为38～49分,平均43.5分,术后14个月为69～92分,平均80.5分,优13例,良5例,可2例,优良率为90.0%。结论应用自体肌腱双股双隧道重建ACL,术后膝关节动态稳定性好,疗效满意。     

正向、反向束间构型在前十字韧带双束重建中的临床效果比较

 目的比较关节镜下前十字韧带(anterior cruciate ligament. ACL)双束重建中正向、反向束间构型的初期临床效果。方法 2008年 4月至 2009年 8月.采用 8股自体腘绳肌肌腱双束重建 ACL治疗单纯 ACL损伤患者 97例.根据患者入: 时住: 号的奇偶数随机分成正向组(采用正向束间构型. 47例)和反向组(采用反向束间构型.50例).移植物均采用微型钢板纽扣进行悬吊式固定。术后患者随访期均超过 1年.根据 IKDC、Lysholm和 Tegner评分标准进行膝关节功能评估。结果术后随访 12~17个月.平均(13.71±1.32)个月。末次随访时.正向组 2例(4.2%)患者伸膝活动受限 10°.5例(10.6%)膝关节轻度屈曲受限(均<15°);反向组所有患者伸膝活动正常.4例(8.0%)屈曲受限约 5°。根据 Lachman试验.正向组 1例(2.1%)I度阳性和 1例(2.1%) II 度阳性.反向组 1例(2.0%) II 度阳性。 KT-1000(屈膝 30°.30N)双膝松弛度差异值正向组为(1.04±1.11) mm.反向组为(0.86±1.12) mm。按照 IKDC客观评级标准.正向组 46例(97.9%)正常或接近正常.反向组 48例(96.0%)正常或接近正常。根据 IKDC、 Lysholm和 Tegner评分标准.两组的差异均无统计学意义。结论采用 8股自体腘绳肌肌腱正向、反向束间构型双束重建 ACL均能有效地恢复膝关节稳定性.两组短期临床效果的差异无统计学意义。但反向束间构型能有效地防止移植物和髁间凹的撞击。     

Clinical Results of Technique for Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hybrid Femoral Fixation and Retroscrew

Background

Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been presented as a means to more accurately restore the native anatomy of this ligament. This article describes a new method that uses a double bundle to perform ACL reconstruction and to evaluate the clinical outcome.

Methods

Grafts are tibialis anterior tendon allograft for anteromedial bundle (AMB) and hamstring tendon autograft without detachment of the tibial insertion for posterolateral bundle (PLB). This technique creates 2 tunnels in both the femur and tibia. Femoral fixation was done by hybrid fixation using Endobutton and Rigidfix for AMB and by biointerference screw for PLB. Tibial fixations are done by Retroscrew for AMB and by native insertion of hamstring tendon for PLB. Both bundles are independently and differently tensioned. We performed ACL reconstruction in 63 patients using our new technique. Among them, 47 participated in this study. The patients were followed up with clinical examination, Lysholm scales and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scoring system and radiological examination with a minimum 12 month follow-up duration.

Results

Significant improvement was seen on Lachman test and pivot-shift test between preoperative and last follow-up. Only one of participants had flexion contracture about 5 degrees at last follow-up. In anterior drawer test by KT-1000, authors found improvement from average 8.3 mm (range, 4 to 18 mm) preoperatively to average 1.4 mm (range, 0 to 6 mm) at last follow-up. Average Lysholm score of all patients was 72.7 ± 8.8 (range, 54 to 79) preoperatively and significant improvement was seen, score was 92.2 ± 5.3 (range, 74 to 97; p < 0.05) at last follow-up. Also IKDC score was normal in 35 cases, near normal in 11 cases, abnormal in 1 case at last follow-up.

Conclusions

Our new double bundle ACL reconstruction technique used hybrid fixation and Retroscrew had favorable outcomes.     

腓骨长肌腱前半部作为自体移植材料的临床研究

 目的 探讨腓骨长肌腱前半部（anterior half of the peroneus longus tendon,AHPLT）作为自体肌腱移植材料重建膝关节韧带的可行性及疗效。方法 2007年7月至2008年1月采用AHPLT作为自体肌腱移植材料的膝关节韧带损伤患者100例,男33例,女67例;年龄16~62岁,平均32.3岁。关节镜下内侧髌股韧带重建49例、多条韧带重建19例、后十字韧带双束重建18例和前十字韧带双束重建14例。切取AHPLT作为全部（49例）或部分（51例）重建材料,采用单切口或双切口技术,重建韧带用螺钉挤压固定。术后评估膝关节Kujala评分、Lysholm评分、Marx评分、国际膝关节文献委员会（International Knee Documentation Committee,IKDC）膝关节主观评估表和客观等级评定、踝关节足踝功能障碍指数（Foot and Ankle Disability Index,FADI）及美国足踝外科学会（American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society,AOFAS）评分。结果 92例获得2年以上随访。术后2年,不同韧带重建组患者膝关节IKDC主观评分、Kujala评分、Lysholm评分及Marx评分均高于重建术前。多条韧带重建、后十字韧带双束重建和前十字韧带双束重建术后IKDC客观等级评定结果达到正常及接近正常者分别为17例、15例和12例,优良率分别为89.5%（17/19）、93.7%（15/16）和100%（12/12）。全部患者手术前后AOFAS评分分别为（97.4±2.0）分和（97.2±1.6）分,FADI评分分别为（96.8±2.2）分和（96.9±2.5）分,差异均无统计学意义。患者均未出现腓神经损伤、腓骨长肌腱断裂等并发症。结论 AHPLT作为自体肌腱移植材料重建膝关节韧带具有操作可行性,近期临床疗效好,切取肌腱后对踝关节功能影响小。     

导航辅助前十字韧带单束与双束重建的比较研究

 目的 比较导航辅助前十字韧带单束与双束重建的临床效果。方法 对导航辅助的前十字韧带单束与双束重建病例进行回顾性队列研究, 单束重建组29 例、双束重建组28 例, 分别使用导航辅助单束、双束重建技术。两组术前KT-1000 患侧与健侧膝关节前向稳定性差值、轴移试验、国际膝关节评分委员会(International Knee Documentation Committee, IKDC)膝关节功能评级的差异均无统计学意义。结果 两组病例随访时间均超过2 年。末次随访时单束重建组膝关节前向稳定性差值为(1.6±5.1)mm, 双束重建组为(2.2±3.0)mm, 差异无统计学意义。单束重建组轴移试验阳性率为14.3%, 双束重建组为29.6%, 差异无统计学意义。单束重建组IKDC 膝关节功能评级优于双束重建组, 差异有统计学意义。单束重建组10 例行二次关节镜检查, 均可见移植物连续且张力好;双束重建组28 例行二次关节镜检查, 8 例(28.6%, 8/28)可见后外束且张力较好, 15 例(53.6%, 15/28)可见后外束但松弛, 5 例(17.8%, 5/28)未见后外束。结论 导航辅助前十字韧带单束与双束重建术后早期膝关节稳定性相同, 单束重建患者对术后膝关节功能的主观评分优于双束重建患者。     

Hybrid Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Introduction of a New Technique for Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Recently, anatomic or double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) has been presented in an effort to more accurately restore the native anatomy. These techniques create 2 tunnels in both the femur and tibia to reproduce the bundles of the ACL. However, the increased number of tunnels, particularly on the femoral side, has raised some concerns among authors and surgeons. We describe a technique to reconstruct the 2 distinct bundles of the ACL by using a single femoral tunnel and 2 tibial tunnels, the “hybrid” ACL reconstruction. The femoral tunnel is drilled through an anteromedial arthroscopy portal, which allows placement in a more anatomic position. Fixation in the femur is achieved with a novel device that separates a soft-tissue graft into 2 independently functioning bundles. Once fixed in the femur, the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the graft are passed through respective tunnels at the anatomic footprint on the tibia. These bundles are independently tensioned, which creates a reconconstruction that is similar to the native ACL. The technique presented provides surgeons with an alternative to other double-bundle techniques involving 4 tunnels.     

单隧道双束腘绳肌腱双Intrafix固定重建前交叉韧带近期疗效观察

目的 探讨单隧道双束腘绳肌腱双Intrafix固定重建前交叉韧带(ACL)中应用的可行性及近期疗效.方法 对30例ACL损伤患者行关节镜下单隧道双束腘绳肌腱ACL重建术.采用膝关节镜前内侧入路(AM)建立股骨隧道,胫骨端用点对点ACL瞄准器建立隧道.隧道股骨端采用Femoral-Intrafix固定将腘绳肌腱分为前内侧束及后外侧束.通过旋转胫骨端移植物,将移植物调整为生理的双束位置,采用Bio-Intrafix固定胫骨端.结果 30例均获随访,时间6～8个月.根据Lysholm膝关节功能评分:术前为19～58(33.17±11.71)分;术后6个月为88～98(95.30±2.10)分(t=30.20,P<0.01).结论 单隧道双束腘绳肌腱双Intrafix固定重建ACL,手术操作简便,固定牢固,近期效果满意.