颈分区性清扫术治疗头颈部鳞状细胞癌的远期疗效

目的 研究颈分区性清扫术在头颈部鳞状细胞癌(简称鳞癌)治疗中的效果。方法 回顾性分析1997年1月～2001年12月在中国医学科学院肿瘤医院接受分区性清扫术的头颈部鳞癌患者123例，其中喉癌77例、口腔癌29例、口咽癌2例、下咽癌15例。分区性清扫术后发现淋巴结病理阴性(pNO)99例，淋巴结病理阳性(pN )24例。随访时间中位数为25个月。结果 101例cNO患者行分区性清扫术后发现pN 14例(13．9％)；22例cN 患者行分区性清扫术后发现pN 10例(45．5％)。157侧分区性清扫标本中共发现52枚阳性淋巴结，其在颈部的分布如下：I区25％，Ⅱ区48％，Ⅲ区25％，Ⅳ区2％。根据Kaplan—Meier方法计算5年颈部复发率，pNO患者为5．87％(95％可信区间0．8％，10．9％)，pN 患者为9．2％(95％可信区间0．0％，21．5％)。结论 颈分区性清扫术从微创观念出发，只要选择恰当，对于头颈部鳞癌患者可以取得与传统颈清扫术相当的效果。更重要的是保留了患者的功能和外观，提高了生活质量。     

择区性颈清扫术治疗63例下咽鳞状细胞癌的颈淋巴转移

目的 分析下咽鳞状细胞癌(简称鳞癌)患者颈部淋巴转移规律,评价择区性颈清扫术(selective neck dissection,SND)在下咽癌颈淋巴转移治疗中的效果.方法 回顾性分析1990年1月至2004年12月在北京大学第一医院接受颈清扫术的下咽鳞癌患者63例,其中cN0患者17例,cN+46例.单侧SND共计15例;双侧SND共计22例;改良性颈清扫术(modified radical neck dissections,MRND)共计16例;一侧行经典性颈清扫术(radical neck dissections,RND)或MRND,另一侧行SND共计10例.随访48例(76.2%),随访时间范围为24～143个月,随访中位时间为41个月.结果 颈清扫术后发现淋巴结病理阴性(pN0)22例,淋巴结病理阳性(pN+)41例.95侧清扫标本中共发现106枚阳性淋巴结,其在颈部的分布如下:Ⅰ区0%,Ⅱ区47.2%(50/106),Ⅲ区33.0%(35/106),Ⅳ区11.3%(12/106),Ⅴ区2.8%(3/106),Ⅵ区5.7%(6/106).值得注意的是,无论是cNO还是cN+下咽癌患者,对侧颈部都可出现淋巴转移和复发.在随访的48例中,共有18例(21例次)复发.颈清扫术后淋巴结复发主要分布在Ⅱ区和Ⅲ区(19例次).根据Kaplan-Meier方法计算3年生存率,pN0患者为58.1%,pN1患者为44.9%,pN2患者为41.1%.Cox同归分析:N分级是影响预后最重要的因素,pN1的危险比为1.7,pN2的危险比为2.2.结论 淋巴转移是下咽鳞癌最重要的预后因素.恰当的选择双侧SND,可以取得较满意效果,同时减少患者形态和功能的损伤.     

颈分区性淋巴结清扫术对头颈鳞癌颈淋巴结阳性患者的治疗意义

颈分区性淋巴结清扫术(selective neck dissection,SND)治疗颈淋巴结阴性头颈鳞癌患者已被认为是有效的治疗方法.SND用于治疗颈淋巴结阳性头颈鳞癌患者仍有争议,本文就该问题对文献资料进行综述,认为①SND不仅是颈淋巴结阴性头颈部鳞癌患者有效的治疗方法,也可有效治疗cNO、但pN+、无淋巴结包膜外侵犯者的患者;②SND对cN1患者治疗也有较好的疗效;③cNO、cN1患者,术后病理检查为pN2或转移淋巴结有包膜外侵犯者应追加术后放疗.     

cN0声门上型喉癌颈淋巴结隐匿性转移规律及处理

目的:探讨cN0声门上型喉癌患者颈部淋巴结隐匿性转移规律并选择合理的颈清扫区域。方法:139例cN0声门上型喉癌患者在行喉切除术同时行颈淋巴结清扫术,其中行改良性颈清扫57例,肩胛舌骨肌上淋巴结清扫30例,颈Ⅱ、Ⅲ区淋巴结清扫52例。将所获淋巴结按颈部分区逐一行组织病理学检查,观察其转移规律及临床疗效。结果:139例cN0声门上型喉癌患者中,同期行单侧颈清扫113例,同期行双侧颈清扫26例。139例(165侧)颈清扫标本经病理学检查,颈淋巴结阳性36例(25.9%),首次病理学检查颈淋巴结阴性者在随访中发现未手术侧淋巴结转移6例,总颈淋巴结隐匿性转移率为30.2%(42/139),单侧隐匿性转移率为26.6%(37/139),双侧隐匿性转移率为3.6%(5/139)。165侧颈清扫标本共获得淋巴结3 594枚,平均每侧21.8枚,共获病理阳性淋巴结83枚,其中位于Ⅰ区1枚(1.2%),Ⅱ区65枚(78.3%),Ⅲ区16枚(19.3%),Ⅳ区1枚(1.2%),Ⅴ区0枚。颈部复发率为5.0%(7/139),pN0与pN+的颈部复发率分别为0和16.7%(7/42),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),总5年生存率为76.3%(106/139)。结论:颈Ⅱ、Ⅲ区是cN0声门上型喉癌颈部淋巴结隐匿性转移的主要区域,择区性(Ⅱ、Ⅲ区)颈淋巴结清扫术治疗cN0声门上型喉癌是合适的。     

择区性颈清扫术治疗下咽鳞状细胞癌颈部淋巴结转移的术式探讨

目的:探讨择区性颈清扫术(SND)治疗下咽鳞状细胞癌颈部淋巴结转移的手术范围。方法:回顾性分析接受SND的26例下咽癌患者,其中11例cN0患者,15例cN+患者。本组共有51侧的SND,其中34侧为选择性SND,17侧为治疗性SND。结果:发现隐匿性颈淋巴结转移6例(55%),颈淋巴结转移均限制在Ⅱ区和Ⅲ区内。cN+患者均证实有颈淋巴结转移,其中Ⅱ区转移占66.7%,Ⅲ区转移占86.7%,Ⅳ区转移占46.7%,Ⅴ区转移占20.0%,另外Ⅰ区仅1例发现转移(6.7%)。随访发现区域复发4例,均为cN+患者,且均未见Ⅰ区复发。结论:cN0下咽癌患者SND(Ⅱ～Ⅲ)清扫有一定的临床意义,尚需进一步验证;cN+患者Ⅰ区清扫尚无必要,SND(Ⅱ～Ⅴ)配合术后放疗能取得满意的疗效。     

淋巴转移阳性舌体鳞癌的颈部治疗策略探讨

目的 分析影响淋巴转移阳性(pathologically node positive,pN+)舌体鳞癌患者颈部复发的相关因素和淋巴转移规律,探讨pN+舌体鳞癌的颈部治疗策略.方法 回顾性分析1991年1月至2006年12月期间138例pN+舌体鳞癌患者的临床和随访资料,分析pN+舌体鳞癌颈部转移淋巴结和复发淋巴结的分布规律和pN+舌体鳞癌临床病理因素和治疗方法对颈部复发的影响.结果 全部病例随访2年以上或至患者死亡.Kaplan-Meier法计算3年生存率为46.4%,5年生存率为36.2%.138例共203个分区发生转移,其中同侧Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ区累及频率达94.6%,47例共66个分区出现颈部淋巴结复发,其中同侧Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ区复发频率达77.3%.颈部复发率与pT分期、pN分期、pTNM分期、淋巴结包膜外侵犯有关(P值均＜0.05);当淋巴结有包膜外侵犯时,术后放疗组的颈部复发率低于未放疗组,但差异无统计学意义(P=0.076);不同颈清扫方式间的颈部复发率差异无统计学意义(P值均＞0.05).Cox多因素生存分析显示,pTNM分期和淋巴结包膜外侵犯是影响pN+舌体鳞癌预后的独立危险因素.结论 pT分期、pN分期、pTNM分期、淋巴结包膜外侵犯是影响pN+舌体鳞癌颈部复发的因素;当淋巴结有包膜外侵犯时,术后放疗有可能降低颈部复发率;改良性颈清扫的颈部复发率与经典性颈清扫没有差异,对非淋巴结构无肿瘤侵犯的pN+舌体鳞癌尽量行改良性颈清扫;pN+舌体鳞癌转移和复发淋巴结主要分布在同侧Ⅰ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ区,择区性颈清扫可应用于pN+舌体鳞癌.     

舌活动部鳞癌颈淋巴结阴性(cN0)的处理

目的 :通过分析舌活动部鳞癌病人临床检查颈淋巴结阴性 (c N0 )的隐匿性淋巴结转移在颈部各区的分布 ,显示舌活动部鳞癌的淋巴结转移规律 ,并指导舌活动部鳞癌 c N0 的分区性颈淋巴清扫的范围。方法 :回顾分析 33例 c N0 的舌活动部鳞癌行选择性全颈淋巴结清扫和挽救性颈淋巴结清扫术的病例 ,分析手术后病理阳性淋巴结 (p N+ )在颈部各区的分布。结果 :病理证实单个淋巴结转移 14例 ,其中 区淋巴结转移 3例 , 区淋巴结转移 7例 , 区淋巴结转移 4例 , 区和 区未见淋巴结转移。多个淋巴结转移 19例 ,各区转移频率分别为 : 区 2 7.4 5 % ; 区 39.2 2 % ; 区31.37% ; 区 0 % ; 区 1.96 %。结论 :舌活动部鳞癌 c N0 的颈部处理没有必要采用经典性全颈清扫术 ,建议行肩胛舌骨肌上的分区性清扫 ,即 区清扫 + 区清扫 + 区清扫即可 ,避免全颈清术给患者造成的术后损害。     

颈分区性淋巴结清扫术对头颈鳞癌颈淋巴结阳性患者的治疗意义

颈分区性淋巴结清扫术(selective neck dissection，SND)治疗颈淋巴结阴性头颈鳞癌患已被认为是有效的治疗方法。SND用于治疗颈淋巴结阳性头颈鳞癌患仍有争议，本就该问题对献资料进行综述，认为：①SND不仅是颈淋巴结阴性头颈部鳞癌患有效的治疗方法，也可有效治疗cN0、但pN^ 、无淋巴结包膜外侵犯的患；②SND对cN1患治疗也有较好的疗效；③cN0、cN1患，术后病理检查为pN2或转移淋巴结有包膜外侵犯应追加术后放疗。     

舌活动部鳞癌颈淋巴结阴性（cN0）的处理

目的：通过分析舌活动部鳞癌病人临床检查颈淋巴结阴性（cN0)的隐匿性淋巴结转移在颈部各区的分布，显示舌活动部鳞癌的淋巴结转移规律，并指导舌活动部鳞癌cN0的分区性颈淋巴清扫的范围。方法：回顾分析33例cN0的舌活动部鳞癌行选择性全颈淋巴结清扫和挽救性颈淋巴结清扫术的病例，分析手术后病理阳性淋巴结（pN^ )在颈部各区的分布。结果：病理证实单个淋巴结转移14例，其中Ⅰ区淋巴结转移3例，Ⅱ区淋巴结转移7例，Ⅲ区淋巴结转移4例，Ⅳ区和Ⅴ区未见淋巴结转移，多个淋巴结转移19例，各区转移频率分别为：Ⅰ区27.45%,Ⅱ区39.22%，Ⅲ区31.37%,Ⅳ区0%，Ⅴ区1.96%。结论：舌活动部鳞癌cN0的颈部处理没有必要采用经典性全颈清扫术，建议行肩胛舌骨肌上的分区性清扫，即Ⅰ区清扫 Ⅱ区清扫 Ⅲ区清扫即可，避免全颈清术给患者造成的术后损害。     

叶绿素染色在喉癌下咽癌颈淋巴结清扫术中的应用

目的 :探讨喉癌、下咽癌的颈淋巴结转移方式。方法 :对 5 0例喉癌、下咽癌患者于颈清扫术前 ,在喉及下咽粘膜下注射叶绿素使颈淋巴结系统染色 ,指导施行颈清扫术并收集淋巴结 ,进行连续切片观察。结果 :颈淋巴结被染成深绿色 ,与周围组织颜色对比明显 ,便于颈部手术和采集淋巴结 ;经病理检查证实 ,颈淋巴结总的转移率为 4 8% ,Ⅰ、Ⅴ区转移时均伴有其它区域的转移 ,Ⅱ、Ⅲ区转移率高于Ⅰ、Ⅳ、Ⅴ区 (P <0 .0 1) ;临床诊断颈淋巴结阴性 (cN0 )的患者淋巴结转移率为 2 3.5 % ,转移区域均在Ⅱ、Ⅲ区。结论 :临床诊断颈淋巴结阳性 (cN+ )喉癌、下咽癌患者的颈清扫手术 ,首先要保证清扫II、III区淋巴结 ,术中所见决定选择性颈清扫术式 ,对cN0 的下咽癌或声门上癌可行单侧或双侧颈深上、中淋巴结清扫术。叶绿素染色清晰 ,安全无毒 ,便于手术 ,可以在颈清扫术中常规应用     

Selective neck dissection for the treatment of neck metastasis from squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the proportion of patients disease free in the neck, with the primary site controlled, who have been treated with a selective neck dissection (SND) for squamous cell carcinoma (SCCa) of the upper aerodigestive tract, and who had cervical metastasis less than 3 cm. STUDY DESIGN: A cohort of patients who fit the inclusion/exclusion criteria was identified retrospectively. Then all surviving patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years. METHODS: A group of 52 patients who had 58 selective neck dissections for cervical metastases from SCCa of the upper aerodigestive tract were identified. The mean age was 56 years (range, 20-85 y), there were 40 males and 12 females, and mean follow-up was 24.5 months (range, 1-64 mo). Twenty-six patients had clinically negative (cNo) neck examinations and 26 had clinically positive neck examinations. Postoperative radiation was given for extracapsular spread, greater than 2 positive nodes, T3, T4, or recurrent disease if the patient had not received radiation before surgery. These radiation criteria excluded 18 patients from postoperative radiation treatment. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the regional control rate with the primary site controlled was 0.94. Six patients developed recurrent neck disease. Three of these 6 patientswere surgically salvaged. Four recurrences were in the dissected field and 2 were out of the dissected field (level V). CONCLUSIONS: With similar indications for radiation therapy, the regional control rate in this cohort is comparable to control rates obtained with modified radical neck dissection.     

Selective neck dissection in the management of the clinically node-negative neck

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of the selective neck dissection (SND) in the management of the clinically node-negative neck. STUDY DESIGN: Case histories were evaluated retrospectively. METHODS: The results of 300 neck dissections performed on 210 patients were studied. RESULTS: The primary sites were oral cavity (91), oropharynx (30), hypopharynx (16), and larynx (73). Seventy-one necks (23%) were node positive on pathological examination. The number of positive nodes varied from 1 to 9 per side. Of necks with positive nodes, 17 (24%) had extracapsular spread. The median follow-up was 41 months. Recurrent disease developed in the dissected neck of 11 patients (4%). Two recurrences developed outside the dissected field. The incidence of regional recurrences was similar in patients in whom nodes were negative on histological examination (3%) when compared with patients with positive nodes without extracapsular spread (4%). In contrast, regional recurrence developed in 18% of necks with extracapsular spread. This observation was statistically significant. Patients having more than two metastatic lymph nodes had a higher incidence of recurrent disease than the patients with carcinoma limited to one or two nodes. Recurrence rate in the pathologically node positive (pN+) necks was comparable to recurrence in those pathologically node negative (pNO) necks in the patients who did not have irradiation. CONCLUSION: SND is effective for controlling neck disease and serves to detect patients who require adjuvant therapy.     

Crile's neck dissection

George Crile, after a long experience with treatment of head and neck cancer and study of a large number of cases, appreciated that these tumors almost always drained through the lymphatic pathways of the neck, rarely metastasized distantly, and were thus theoretically curable by resection of the primary tumor and its lymphatic draining shed. After evaluation of his early failures, he found that a block resection of all of the lymph node-bearing tissue of the neck in addition to resection of the primary tumor was the most effective means of obtaining a cure, particularly in patients with clinical evidence of spread of disease to the neck. Such radical surgery, at the time, was fraught with difficulty because of the lack of blood transfusion, antibiotics, and endotracheal anesthesia, but Crile devised several strategies for combating these obstacles. Crile performed 36 such block resections with a determinate 3-year survival of 75% compared with 19% 3-year survival in patients who had not undergone block resection. The surgical precepts developed by Crile laid the foundation for the effective modern surgical treatment of head and neck cancer.     

Role of lateral neck dissection in cancers of the larynx and hypopharynx with No neck

Radical neck dissection is a standard procedure carried out for the teatment of palpable nodes in the neck but if carried out electively in cases where there are no palpable nodes in the neck it is considered to be an overtreatment with its associated morbity. Lateral neck dissection was carried out on twenty patients who had T31 T4 lesion of the larynx and hypophar-vnx with NO neck. The dissection entails removal of Level II. III and IV nodes. Occult metastasis 80% and 85% respectively. The mean follow up was 13 monts. It appears from our study that elective lateral neck dissection is a promising and safe procedure and may be useful as an important prognostic tool in sampling the lymph nodes and predicting recurrences in the neck.     

Fibromatosis of the head and neck

Fibromatosis is a locally infiltrative fibrous tissue proliferation with a tendency to recur locally. From a large series of head and neck patients treated between 1977 and 1994 in our institute, we retrieved the records of nine adult patients diagnosed with this disease. They serve as examples to demonstrate this rare entity in the head and neck. Five out of nine lesions were localized in level V (posterior triangle of the neck). The majority of patients were treated by surgery in combination with radiotherapy. None of the patients died of the disease.     

Upper neck (level II) dissection for N0 neck supraglottic carcinoma

OBJECTIVES: Elective neck dissection for the N0 neck in head and neck surgery is still controversial. This prospective nonrandomized study of N0 supraglottic carcinoma was designed to find an appropriate method of neck management. STUDY DESIGN: Anatomical studies show that the first echelon of lymphatic drainage from the supraglottic larynx is toward the upper jugular nodes (level II). An upper neck dissection (UND) was applied and all the lymph nodes were sent for frozen section. If the subclinical metastasis was found, a modified neck dissection was performed. If the nodes harbored no foci of cancer, the patients were observed after surgery on the supraglottic lesions. METHODS: Patient records of 142 patients with supraglottic laryngeal cancer (T1-4N0M0) were reviewed, with special attention paid to neck recurrences and survival rates. The cases were treated between 1976 and 1990 and all were observed for at least 5 years after the operation or until the time of death. RESULTS: The UND specimens of 142 patients were negative for metastasis. The 5-year survival rate for this group after surgery was 80.8%, according to the life table analysis. Fifteen of the 142 patients (10.6%) had neck recurrences during the period of observation within 5 years. The recurrence rate of this series with limited dissection on the neck was comparable with those reported in the literature after neck dissection, either radical or modified. CONCLUSIONS: There is no need for a comprehensive neck dissection for N0 supraglottic laryngeal cancer. A selective neck dissection such as UND (level II) or a supraomohyoid neck dissection (sparing the submandibular region) of level II and III will serve the purpose of radical neck treatment for the supraglottic cancer.     

颈廓清术的几点改进(附65例报告)

目的：探讨颈廓清手术的方法以提高治疗效果。方法：于65例头颈肿瘤患者行颈廓清术时,对切口、探查入路及手术操作作了部分改进。结果：65例颈廓清术时间平均为110min,术中出血量平均为120ml,手术并发症发生率降至1．54％,术后2年生存率为86．2％（56／65）,3年生存率81．6％（31／38）。结论：改进后的颈廓清术,手术时间缩短,术中出血减少,并发症少,近期疗效有所提高。     

Planned neck dissection after concomitant radiochemotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Since 1998, at our academic, multidisciplinary head and neck cancer treatment center, it has been our policy to treat appropriate patients with locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) with concomitant radiochemotherapy followed within 6 weeks by planned neck dissection(s). Our objective was to investigate the oncologic efficacy of planned neck dissection, to date, in this patient population with a focus on outcomes in the neck. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a cumulative patient database. METHODS: The medical records of all patients who underwent planned neck dissection(s) after concomitant radiochemotherapy for locoregionally advanced SCCHN at Beth Israel Medical Center and The Institute for Head and Neck Cancer in New York City were reviewed. For each patient, preradiochemotherapy primary and neck stage, postradiochemotherapy/preneck dissection clinical and radiographic neck status, type of neck dissection(s) performed, pathologic status of the neck dissection specimen(s), length of follow-up (after planned neck dissection), disease status at last follow-up, and site(s) of recurrence were recorded. Local, regional, and distant disease control rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Fifty-one planned neck dissections were performed on 39 radiochemotherapy patients (12 patients had bilateral operations) between early 1998 and October, 2003. Thirty-two (82%) patients had N2 or greater neck disease, with 29 (74%) having T3/T4 disease at various upper aerodigestive tract primary sites. Patients received an average of 6,700 cGy and 6,000 cGy external beam radiation therapy to primary disease sites and involved cervical lymphatics respectively, concomitant with one of three platinum-based chemotherapy schedules. At a mean follow-up time of 24 (range 8-57) months for the entire study population, there has been only one neck recurrence (N2A neck). No patient with N2B (n = 11), N2C (n = 13, with majority of heminecks staged N2B), or N3 (n = 5) disease has recurred in the neck. No recurrences have occurred in the 41 heminecks (in 33 patients) where modified neck dissection (including 24 selective procedures) was performed despite the presence of residual carcinoma in 13 (32%) of these heminecks on pathologic review. Among all heminecks with residual carcinoma present (n = 18) in the neck dissection specimen, there has been only one neck recurrence. There have been no recurrences in the 26 heminecks (in 19 patients) with incomplete clinical response after radiochemotherapy despite the presence of residual carcinoma in 14 (54%) of these necks on pathologic review. The clinical and radiographic absence of residual disease after radiochemotherapy did not always predict a complete pathologic response. Surgical complications have been limited (1 chyle leak, 1 wound breakdown). CONCLUSIONS: The integration of planned neck dissection into the multidisciplinary management of patients with locoregionally advanced SCCHN is highly effective in controlling cervical metastatic disease. Modified and selective neck dissection procedures can be performed in the majority of patients, regardless of the response in the neck subsequent to concomitant radiochemotherapy. We recommend a planned neck dissection(s) in all patients staged (pretreatment) with N2 or greater neck disease and in select N1 cases.