Phase I dose escalation trial of hypofractionated limited-field external beam thoracic radiotherapy for limited-stage small cell carcinoma of the lung

Purpose

To define the maximal tolerated dose of hypofractionated thoracic radiotherapy given with concurrent chemotherapy for limited-stage small cell lung cancer.

Materials and methods

Limited-stage small cell lung cancer patients were prescribed 54, 58, 62 or 65 Gy, all given in 25 daily fractions and commenced on or before the second chemotherapy cycle. Dose level accrual was performed sequentially. Conformal radiotherapy techniques were used and targeted gross disease plus margin. Four cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy were prescribed. Primary endpoint was the rate of acute RT toxicities according to NCI Common Toxicity Criteria scales. The dose which caused unacceptable acute radiotherapy toxicity rates according to pre-defined stopping rules defined the maximal tolerated radiotherapy dose.

Results

Six patients were accrued to each of the 54, 58 and 62 Gy dose levels. There were no radiotherapy-related deaths. No grade 3 toxicities occurred in the 54 and 58 Gy groups. There were 2 grade 3 RT toxicities in the 62 Gy group. There were 14 complete responses. Trial accrual has stopped at the 62 Gy group according to trial stopping rules.

Conclusions

The maximal tolerated hypofractionated thoracic radiotherapy dose in this trial was 58 Gy in 25 daily fractions.     

Dosimetric correlations of acute esophagitis in lung cancer patients treated with radiotherapy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the factors associated with acute esophagitis in lung cancer patients treated with thoracic radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We examined 35 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (n = 27, 77%) and small-cell lung cancer (n = 8, 23%) treated with thoracic radiotherapy between February 2003 and November 2004. The median patient age was 70 years (range, 50-83 years). The disease stage was Stage I in 2 patients (6%), Stage II in 1 (3%), Stage IIIa in 10 (28%), Stage IIIb in 9 (26%), and Stage IV in 9 (26%); 4 patients (11%) had recurrent disease after surgery. A median dose of 60 Gy (range, 50-67 Gy) was given to the isocenter and delivered in single daily fractions of 1.8 or 2 Gy. With heterogeneity corrections, the median given dose to the isocenter was 60.3 Gy (range, 49.9-67.2 Gy). Of the 35 patients, 30 (86%) received concurrent chemotherapy consisting of a platinum agent, cisplatin or carboplatin, combined with paclitaxel in 18 patients (52%), irinotecan hydrochloride in 7 (20%), vincristine sulfate and etoposide in 2 (5%), vinorelbine ditartrate in 1 (3%), etoposide in 1 (3%), and docetaxel in 1 patient (3%). Three of these patients underwent induction therapy with cisplatin and irinotecan hydrochloride, administered before thoracic radiotherapy, and concurrent chemotherapy. Esophageal toxicity was graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. The following factors were analyzed with respect to their association with Grade 1 or worse esophagitis by univariate and multivariate analyses: age, gender, concurrent chemotherapy, chemotherapeutic agents, maximal esophageal dose, mean esophageal dose, and percentage of esophageal volume receiving >10 to >65 Gy in 5-Gy increments. RESULTS: Of the 35 patients, 25 (71%) developed acute esophagitis, with Grade 1 in 20 (57%) and Grade 2 in 5 (14%). None of the patients had Grade 3 or worse toxicity. The most significant correlation was between esophagitis and percentage of esophageal volume receiving >35 Gy on univariate (p = 0.002) and multivariate (p = 0.018) analyses. CONCLUSION: The percentage of esophageal volume receiving >35 Gy was the most statistically significant factor associated with mild acute esophagitis.     

Phase I study of conformal radiotherapy with concurrent gemcitabine in locally advanced bladder cancer

PURPOSE: A prospective phase I trial was conducted to determine the maximal tolerated dose of gemcitabine given once weekly during hypofractionated conformal radiotherapy to patients with locally advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Eight male patients, median age 69 years, with Stage T2 (n = 4) or T3 (n = 4) N0M0, were enrolled in cohorts of 3. Treatment comprised conformal radiotherapy (52.5 Gy in 20 fractions) within 4 weeks, with concurrent gemcitabine once weekly for four cycles. The weekly gemcitabine dose was escalated from 100 mg/m(2) in increments of 50 mg/m(2) per cohort. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as any acute Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) toxicity Grade 3 or greater arising in >1 of 3 patients in each cohort. Tumor response was assessed cystoscopically and radiologically at 3 months. RESULTS: All 8 patients completed radiotherapy, and 6 of 8 completed chemoradiotherapy. No acute toxicity greater than RTOG Grade 1 was seen with gemcitabine at 100 mg/m(2). Dose-limiting toxicity was observed at 150 mg/m(2) with Grade 3 toxicity seen in 2 of 2 patients (one bladder, one bowel). An additional 3 patients received 100 mg/m(2) with minimal toxicity. No hematologic toxicity was encountered. A complete response was seen in 7 (87.5%) of 8 patients, all of whom were disease free at a median follow-up of 19.5 months (range, 14-23 months). No late toxicity (greater than RTOG Grade 0) has been observed. CONCLUSION: The maximal tolerated dose for gemcitabine given once weekly with concurrent hypofractionated conformal bladder radiotherapy was 150 mg/m(2), with a maximal recommended dose of 100 mg/m(2). This dose regimen has now entered Phase II clinical trials.     

局限期小细胞肺癌加速超分割放疗同步EP方案化疗的剂量递增I期研究

背景与目的加速超分割放疗（每日两次方案）联合EP方案同步化疗是美国国立综合癌症网络（Na-tional Comprehensive Cancer Network, NCCN）指南推荐的局限期小细胞肺癌的标准治疗方式,但国人对EP方案标准化疗剂量耐受性尚不明确。本研究旨在探讨局限期小细胞肺癌同步放化疗EP方案的最大耐受剂量。方法研究纳入病理证实的局限期小细胞肺癌患者,进行加速超分割放疗同步EP方案（依托泊苷+顺铂）化疗,放疗处方剂量为45 Gy/30 f,1.5 Gy/f,每日两次,同一日两次放疗间隔时间≥6 h,5天/周,共3周完成。化疗方案采用依托泊苷联合顺铂,每21天为1周期,具体依托泊苷100 mg/m2,d1-d3,顺铂采用剂量递增的方式（第1组为70 mg/m2 d1,第2组为75 mg/m2 d1）。主要观察指标为治疗期间的血液学毒性。次要观察指标为非血液学毒性和1年总生存期（overall sur-vival, OS）、无进展生存期（progression free survival, PFS）。根据不良事件常用术语评定标准（Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, NCI-CTCAE）4.0,最大耐受剂量设定为6例患者中不超过1例患者出现剂量限制毒性（4级血液学毒性）的剂量,同时下一剂量组6例患者至少2例出现剂量限制性毒性。结果研究共纳入20例局限期小细胞肺癌患者,平均年龄49.50（30-68）岁。第1组入组6例患者,1例患者出现4度中性粒细胞减少;后第2组入组14例患者,1例患者出现4度中性粒细胞减少。其中,第1组有4例患者出现≥3度血液学毒性,1例患者出现3度以上放射性食管炎;第2组有10例患者出现≥3度血液学毒性,无患者出现3度以上放射性食管炎。中位随访9.0个月（3.2个月-36.2个月）,1年OS、PFS分别为91%、62%。结论局限期小细胞肺癌患者采用加速超分割放疗联合EP方案化疗将顺铂剂量递增至75 mg/m2是安全的,其有效性还需要进一步扩大样本量和随访更长的时间来证实。     

Routine use of approximately 60 Gy once-daily thoracic irradiation for patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE: To review the outcome of patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer receiving daily thoracic irradiation (RT) to approximately 60 Gy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The records of patients treated with RT for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer between 1991 and 1999 at Duke University were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-five patients were identified who had received continuous course once-daily 1.8-2 Gy fractions to approximately 60 Gy (range 58-66). All patients received chemotherapy (CHT); 32 received concurrent RT/CHT and 33 sequential CHT and then RT. Prophylactic cranial RT was administered to 17 patients. The time from diagnosis to local failure, tumor progression, and death was assessed using actuarial methods. The median follow-up for all patients was 16.7 months and for surviving patients was 29.6 months. The median age was 64 years (range 36-83), and the median Karnofsky performance status was 80 (range 50-100). RESULTS: The 3-year actuarial rate of local failure, progression-free survival, and overall survival was 40%, 25%, and 23%, respectively. One case of acute Grade 3 esophagitis developed. Ten late complications occurred: four pulmonary, two esophageal, two infectious, one leukemia, and one retinal toxicity with prophylactic cranial RT. Six were mild and resolved with treatment. CONCLUSION:CHT plus approximately 60 Gy of once-daily RT for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer was generally well tolerated. The survival rates were less than have been reported using 45 Gy in 1.5-Gy twice-daily fractions (2-year overall survival rate 47% compared with 30% in this study), but may be comparable because fewer than one-half our patients received concurrent CHT/RT and only 26% received prophylactic cranial RT. The relatively low rate of normal tissue morbidity in our patients supports the use of conventional once-daily fractionation to > or = 60 Gy. A randomized trial would be required to compare the outcomes after maximally tolerated dose twice-daily RT vs. maximally tolerated dose daily RT.     

A phase II trial of accelerated radiotherapy using weekly stereotactic conformal boost for supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme: RTOG 0023

PURPOSE: This phase II trial was performed to assess the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of dose-intense accelerated radiation therapy using weekly fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) boost for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with histologically confirmed GBM with postoperative enhancing tumor plus tumor cavity diameter <60 mm were enrolled. A 50-Gy dose of standard radiation therapy (RT) was given in daily 2-Gy fractions. In addition, patients received four FSRT treatments, once weekly, during Weeks 3 to 6. FSRT dosing of either 5 Gy or 7 Gy per fraction was given for a cumulative dose of 70 or 78 Gy in 29 (25 standard RT + 4 FSRT) treatments over 6 weeks. After the RT course, carmustine (BCNU) at 80 mg/m(2) was given for 3 days, every 8 weeks, for 6 cycles. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were analyzed. Toxicity included: 3 Grade 4 chemotherapy, 3 acute Grade 4 radiotherapy, and 1 Grade 3 late. The median survival time was 12.5 months. No survival difference is seen when compared with the RTOG historical database. Patients with gross total resection (41%) had a median survival time of 16.6 months vs. 12.0 months for historic controls with gross total resection (p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: This first, multi-institutional FSRT boost trial for GBM was feasible and well tolerated. There is no significant survival benefit using this dose-intense RT regimen. Subset analysis revealed a trend toward improved outcome for GTR patients suggesting that patients with minimal disease burden may benefit from this form of accelerated RT.     

Combined chemotherapy with twice-daily radiation therapy for inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus

Background A study with chemotherapy and twice-a-day radiotherapy in patients with esophageal carcinoma was performed to evaluate toxicity and efficacy. Methods Thirty-seven patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (1, stage IIB; 19, stage III; 17, stage IV) were enrolled. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of 3 cycles with cisplatin (70 mg/m² on day 1) and 96-hour continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (700 mg/m² per day on days 1 to 4). Second and third cycles were initiated on day 22 and day 92, respectively. Radiotherapy was administered twice daily with concomitant boost technique over days 43 to 75, up to a total dose of 60 Gy. Daily fractions were 2.0 Gy for large fields and 1.0 Gy for small fields at 4- to 6-hour intervals. Results Twenty-nine patients (78%) received the full treatment. Of the 36 patients who started radiotherapy, 94% were able to complete the full course. Grade 3+toxicities observed were leukopenia 5%, anemia 14%, thrombocytopenia 5%, vomiting 14%, esophagitis 5%, pulmonary toxicity 5%, cardiac toxicity 3%, hepatic dysfunction 3%, and nephrotoxicity 3%. Of the 36 patients who started radiotherapy, 8 (22%) showed complete response, and 16 (44%) had partial response. The median survival time was 9 months, with a 1-year actuarial survival rate of 33%. Death was due to local-regional tumor manifestations in 18 patients. Conclusion The preliminary analysis showed that this treatment scheme was well tolerated with acceptable toxicity, but local-regional failure remains the principal cause of death. New treatment schemes such as concurrent use of chemotherapy with radiation warrant further investigation.     

The safety and usefulness of high-dose-rate endoluminal brachytherapy as a boost in the treatment of patients with esophageal cancer with external beam radiation with or without chemotherapy

PURPOSE: This study reports the results of a single-institution experience with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) used as a boost in the treatment of esophageal cancer with external beam radiation therapy (ERT) with or without chemotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients without evidence of metastatic disease were identified. HDRBT was given before ERT with a dose of 20 Gy in 5 fractions. Patients with a Karnofsky performance of more than 70 received treatment with 50 Gy in 25 fractions and concurrent 5-fluorouracil and cis-platinum during Weeks 1 and 5, whereas patients with a Karnofsky performance of less than 70 were treated with radiation therapy alone with 35 Gy in 14 fractions. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients received HDRBT treatment with combined ERT and chemotherapy and 17 patients with ERT alone. The incidence of acute bone marrow toxicity was 55% Grade 2 and 15% Grade 3, and 85% of patients had Grade 2 esophagitis. With a median follow-up time of 26 months, the median survival was 21 months; the 2-year local recurrence was 25%, and the 5-year survival rate was 28%. CONCLUSION: HDRBT is safe and beneficial for local control in the radical treatment of patients with esophageal cancer.     

Phase I-II trial of concurrent capecitabine and oxaliplatin with preoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

PURPOSE: To identify the maximal tolerated dose level of preoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with capecitabine and oxaliplatin and to evaluate the efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with rectal T3-T4 and/or N0-N+ rectal cancer received capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice daily Monday through Friday and oxaliplatin 60 mg/m(2) intravenously on Days 1, 8, and 15, concurrently with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The radiation dose was increased in 5.0-Gy steps in cohorts of 3 patients starting from 37.5 Gy in 15 fractions (dose level [DL] 1). DL2 and DL3 were designed to reach 42.5 Gy in 17 fractions and 47.5 Gy in 19 fractions, respectively. RESULTS: No dose-limiting toxicity was observed at DL1 or DL2. Of the 3 patients treated at DL3, 1 presented with Grade 3 diarrhea, which was considered a dose-limiting toxicity, and 3 additional patients were added. Of the 6 patients treated at DL3, no new dose-limiting toxicities were observed, and DL3 was identified as the recommended dose in this study. Eight additional patients were treated at 47.5 Gy. Grade 2 proctitis was the most frequent adverse event (40%); Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in 2 patients (10%). All patients underwent surgery, and 17 patients (85%) underwent R0 resection. Four patients (20%) presented with a histologic response of Grade 4, 11 (55%) with Grade 3+, 2 (15%) with Grade 3, and 2 patients (10%) with Grade 2. CONCLUSION: The maximal tolerated dose in this study was 47.5 Gy. The high rates of pathologic response of Grade 3+ and 4 must be confirmed through the accrual of new patients in the Phase II study.     

Twice-daily fractionation of external irradiation with brachytherapy and chemotherapy in carcinoma of the cervix with positive para-aortic lymph nodes: phase II study of the radiation therapy oncology group 92-10

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of twice-daily external irradiation to the pelvis and para-aortics with brachytherapy and concurrent chemotherapy for carcinoma of the cervix with positive para-aortic lymph nodes.Methods and Materials: This study was designed to administer twice-daily radiation doses of 1.2 Gy to the pelvis and para-aortics at 4- to 6-h intervals, 5 days per week. The total external radiation doses were 24 to 48 Gy to the whole pelvis, 12 to 36 Gy parametrial boost, and 48 Gy to the para-aortics with an additional boost to a total dose of 54 to 58 Gy to the known metastatic para-aortic site. One or two intracavitary applications were performed to deliver a total minimum dose of 85 Gy to point A. Cisplatin (75 mg/m², days 1 and 22) and 5-FU (1000 mg/m²/24 h × 4 days; days 1 and 22) were given for two or three cycles.Results: Twenty-nine patients with clinical Stages I to IV carcinoma of the cervix with biopsy-proven para-aortic lymph nodes were enrolled in this study. Hyperfractionated external radiotherapy was completed in 86% (25 of 29). Brachytherapy was given in two applications to 48% (14 of 29), 31% (9 of 29) had one intracavitary application, 14% (4 of 29) had no brachytherapy, one had three applications, and one had five HDR applications. Radiotherapy was completed per protocol in 69%. Three courses of chemotherapy were given to 24% (7 of 29), 72% (21 of 29) received two courses, and one patient did not receive chemotherapy. The acute toxicity from chemotherapy was Grade 1 in 3%, Grade 2 in 17%, Grade 3 in 48%, and Grade 4 in 28%. Radiotherapy toxicity was Grade 1 in 7%, Grade 2 in 34%, Grade 3 in 21%, and Grade 4 in 28%. One Grade 5 toxicity occurred and the patient died from a myocardial infarction from chemotherapy and radiotherapy colitis during her course of therapy. The median follow-up time was 18.9 months. The overall survival estimates were 59% at 1 year and 47% at 2 years. The probability of local-regional failure was 38% at 1 year and 49% at 2 years. The probability of disease failure at any site was 45% at 1 year and 59% at 2 years.Conclusion: The results suggest that twice-daily external irradiation to the pelvis and para-aortics with brachytherapy and concurrent chemotherapy resulted in an unacceptably high rate (31%, 9 of 29) of Grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity. One patient died from complications of therapy. Radiotherapy was completed per protocol in 69%. The survival estimates appear no better than standard fractionation radiotherapy without chemotherapy. Additional follow-up is necessary for long-term survival estimates.     

Dose-volumetric parameters of acute esophageal toxicity in patients with lung cancer treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate which dose-volumetric parameters are associated with the risk of > or = Grade 3 acute esophageal toxicity (AET) in lung cancer patients treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred twenty-four lung cancer patients treated curatively with 3D-CRT were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (RT) with median dose of 60 Gy (range, 54-66 Gy) delivered in 30 fractions (range, 27-33 fractions). Thirty-one patients underwent curative surgery before RT. Ninety-two patients received chemotherapy (induction, 18; concurrent +/- induction, 74). Acute esophageal toxicity was scored by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. The parameters analyzed included sex; age; Karnofsky performance score; weight loss; surgery; concurrent chemotherapy; the percentages of organ volume receiving > or =20 Gy (V20), > or =30 Gy (V30), > or =40 Gy (V40), > or =50 Gy (V50), > or =55 Gy (V55), > or = 58 Gy (V58), > or =60 Gy (V60), and > or =63 Gy (V63); the percent and absolute length of the esophagus irradiated; the maximum and mean dose to the esophagus; and normal tissue complication probability. RESULTS: Of the 124 patients, 15 patients (12.1%) had Grade 3 AET, and 1 (0.8%) patient had Grade 4 AET. There was no fatal Grade 5 AET. In univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, concurrent chemotherapy and V60 were significantly associated with the development of severe (> or = Grade 3) AET (p < 0.05). Severe AET was observed in 15 of 74 patients (20.3%) who received concurrent chemotherapy, and in 1 of 50 patients (2.0%) who did not (p = 0.002). Severe AET was observed in 5 of 87 patients (5.7%) with V60 < or = 30% and in 11 of 37 patients (29.7%) with V60 > 30% (p < 0.001). Among 50 patients who did not receive concurrent chemotherapy, severe AET was observed in 0 of 43 patients (0%) with V60 < or = 30% and in 1 of 7 patients (14.2%) with V60 > 30% (p = 0.140). Among 74 patients who received concurrent chemotherapy, severe AET was observed in 5 of 44 patients (11.4%) with V60 < or = 30% and in 10 of 30 patients (33.3%) with V60 > 30% (p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent chemotherapy and V60 were associated with the development of severe AET > or = Grade 3. For patients being treated with concurrent chemotherapy, V60 is considered to be a useful parameter predicting the risk of severe AET after conventionally fractionated 3D-CRT for lung cancer.     

High-dose-rate brachytherapy boost following concurrent chemoradiotherapy for esophageal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy, toxicity, and the optimum dose of high-dose-rate brachytherapy following chemoradiotherapy (CRT) compared with a historical group of patients treated with a combination of external beam and brachytherapy (RT alone). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifty-three patients with localized esophageal cancer received concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by brachytherapy. The chemotherapy regimen was a combination of cisplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1 and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 continuous infusion from days 1-4 during the first and last week of external irradiation. Radiotherapy consisted of external irradiation to a total dose of 40-61 Gy (median 50 Gy) and brachytherapy to 8-24 Gy (median 16 Gy) in 2-4 fractions. RESULTS: Acute toxicity was well tolerated. A fistula occurred in one patient 1 week after completion of external irradiation. Local control was achieved in 32/53 (60%) compared with 42% of the RT group (p = 0.029). Local control rates of the CRT group were significantly better than those of the RT group in Stages II and III. Late toxicity (esophageal ulceration and strictures) occurred in 18 (34%) of the CRT group compared with 12% in the RT group (p = 0.013). Severe late toxicity (RTOG/EORTC criteria Grade 3-4) occurred in six patients (15%) whose chemotherapy was followed by 16-24 Gy via brachytherapy compared with 2.5% in the RT group (p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: Combined chemoradiotherapy and brachytherapy boost achieved better local control than radiotherapy alone. However, a high level of severe late toxicity was observed especially with 16-24 Gy via brachytherapy.     

Phase I study of thoracic radiation dose escalation with concurrent chemotherapy for patients with limited small-cell lung cancer: Report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocol 97-12

PURPOSE: The purpose of RTOG 97-12 was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of thoracic radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent chemotherapy for patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients received four cycles of cisplatin (60 mg/m(2) i.v.) and etoposide (120 mg/m(2) i.v. Days 1-3) (PE), with concurrent thoracic RT starting on Day 1. Thoracic RT was given during the first two cycles with 1.8 Gy/fraction daily to the clinical target volume, followed by thoracic RT to the gross tumor volume b.i.d. for the last 3, 5, 7, 9, or 11 treatment days (total dose 50.4, 54.0, 57.6, 61.2, or 64.8 Gy, respectively). The MTD was based on the dose that produced Grades 3-4 nonhematologic toxicity (mainly esophagitis and pneumonitis) in greater than 50% of patients. RESULTS: After the first 8 patients were enrolled in Arm 1, administration of etoposide was changed from 120 mg/m(2) i.v. on Days 2 and 3 of each cycle to 240 mg/m(2) p.o. for patient convenience as outpatients. Total thoracic RT doses from 50.4 Gy to 61.2 Gy over 5 weeks given with PE were well tolerated. Three of the first 5 patients in the 64.8 Gy arm developed Grade 3 acute esophagitis; the MTD was determined to be 61.2 Gy. Fifty-four (87%) of the 62 evaluable patients achieved a complete (68%) or partial (19%) tumor response. The 18-month survival was 25% for patients receiving 50.4 Gy and 82% for those receiving 61.2 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD for this accelerated thoracic RT regimen with concurrent PE was 61.2 Gy over 5 weeks.     

Toxicity and outcome results of RTOG 9311: a phase I-II dose-escalation study using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung carcinoma

PURPOSE: To evaluate prospectively the acute and late morbidities from a multiinstitutional three-dimensional radiotherapy dose-escalation study for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 179 patients were enrolled in a Phase I-II three-dimensional radiotherapy dose-escalation trial. Of the 179 patients, 177 were eligible. The use of concurrent chemotherapy was not allowed. Twenty-five patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were stratified at escalating radiation dose levels depending on the percentage of the total lung volume that received >20 Gy with the treatment plan (V(20)). Patients with a V(20) <25% (Group 1) received 70.9 Gy in 33 fractions, 77.4 Gy in 36 fractions, 83.8 Gy in 39 fractions, and 90.3 Gy in 42 fractions, successively. Patients with a V(20) of 25-36% (Group 2) received doses of 70.9 Gy and 77.4 Gy, successively. The treatment arm for patients with a V(20) > or =37% (Group 3) closed early secondary to poor accrual (2 patients) and the perception of excessive risk for the development of pneumonitis. Toxicities occurring or persisting beyond 90 days after the start of radiotherapy were scored as late toxicities. The estimated toxicity rates were calculated on the basis of the cumulative incidence method. RESULTS: The following acute Grade 3 or worse toxicities were observed for Group 1: 70.9 Gy (1 case of weight loss), 77.4 Gy (nausea and hematologic toxicity in 1 case each), 83.8 Gy (1 case of hematologic toxicity), and 90.3 Gy (3 cases of lung toxicity). The following acute Grade 3 or worse toxicities were observed for Group 2: none at 70.9 Gy and 2 cases of lung toxicity at 77.4 Gy. No patients developed acute Grade 3 or worse esophageal toxicity. The estimated rate of Grade 3 or worse late lung toxicity at 18 months was 7%, 16%, 0%, and 13% for Group 1 patients receiving 70.9, 77.4, 83.8, or 90.3 Gy, respectively. Group 2 patients had an estimated late lung toxicity rate of 15% at 18 months for both 70.9 and 77.4 Gy. The prognostic factors for late pneumonitis in multivariate analysis were the mean lung dose and V(20). The estimated rate of late Grade 3 or worse esophageal toxicity at 18 months was 8%, 0%, 4%, and 6%, for Group 1 patients receiving 70.9, 77.4, 83.8, 90.3 Gy, respectively, and 0% and 5%, respectively, for Group 2 patients receiving 70.9 and 77.4 Gy. The dyspnea index scoring at baseline and after therapy for functional impairment, magnitude of task, and magnitude of effort revealed no change in 63%, functional pulmonary loss in 23%, and pulmonary improvement in 14% of patients. The observed locoregional control and overall survival rates were each similar among the study arms within each dose level of Groups 1 and 2. Locoregional control was achieved in 50-78% of patients. Thirty-one patients developed regional nodal failure. The location of nodal failure in relationship to the RT volume was documented in 28 of these 31 patients. Twelve patients had isolated elective nodal failures. Fourteen patients had regional failure in irradiated nodal volumes. Two patients had both elective nodal and irradiated nodal failure. CONCLUSIONS: The radiation dose was safely escalated using three-dimensional conformal techniques to 83.8 Gy for patients with V(20) values of <25% (Group 1) and to 77.4 Gy for patients with V(20) values between 25% and 36% (Group 2), using fraction sizes of 2.15 Gy. The 90.3-Gy dose level was too toxic, resulting in dose-related deaths in 2 patients. Elective nodal failure occurred in <10% of patients.     

Effects of amifostine on acute toxicity from concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer: report of a randomized comparative trial

PURPOSE: To determine the ability of amifostine to reduce the severity and/or incidence of the acute toxicities of concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) for non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with inoperable, nonmetastatic non-small-cell lung cancer receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy were randomized to one of two treatment groups. Arm 1 patients received thoracic RT (total dose, 69.6 Gy in 58 fractions of 1.2 Gy b.i.d. 5 d/wk), plus oral etoposide (50 mg b.i.d. 30 min before thoracic RT for 10 days, repeated on Day 29) and cisplatin (50 mg/m2 i.v. on Days 1, 8, 29, and 36). Arm 2 patients received the same treatment plus amifostine (500 mg i.v. 20-30 min before any treatment the first 2 days of each week). Acute effects were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were enrolled between November 1998 and January 2001. The minimal follow-up was 24 months, and the median follow-up of living patients was 31 months. The patient and tumor characteristics were equally distributed between the patients in the two arms. The median survival time was 20 months in Arm 1 patients and 19 months in Arm 2 patients. The maximal esophageal toxicity was mild (Grade 1) in 23%, moderate (Grade 2) in 42%, and severe (Grade 3-4) in 35% of patients in Arm 1; the corresponding rates for the Arm 2 patients were 48%, 35%, and 16% (p = 0.021). Severe pneumonitis occurred in 16% of the Arm 1 and none of the Arm 2 patients (p = 0.020, chi-square test). Neutropenic fever occurred in 39% of Arm 1 and 16% of Arm 2 patients (p = 0.046, chi-square test). Mild hypotension, dysgeusia, and sneezing were significantly more frequent among the patients in Arm 2. CONCLUSION: Amifostine reduced the severity and incidence of acute esophageal, pulmonary, and hematologic toxicity resulting from concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy and RT. Amifostine had no apparent effect on survival in these patients with unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer, suggesting that it does not have a tumor-protective effect.     

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent capecitabine for pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: Local failure continues to be a major problem in the management of pancreatic cancer. Delivery of adequate radiation doses to the pancreas is limited by radiation-sensitive normal structures in the upper abdomen. To overcome some of these restrictions, we have developed a regimen of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with concurrent capecitabine. METHODS AND MATERIAL: This is a retrospective analysis of the first 15 patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated on this regimen (7 as adjuvant therapy after curative resection and 8 patients for unresectable disease). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy was planned using the CORVUS system and delivered with a segmented multileaf collimator, using a 6-MV photon beam and 10 intensity steps. Two target volumes were entered: target 1 consisted of the gross tumor volume (in unresectable cases) or the tumor bed (in postsurgical cases); and target 2 consisted of the draining lymph nodes. Both targets were treated simultaneously in 25 daily fractions, 5 days a week. In the postoperative setting, the total dose to target 1 was 45-54 Gy (median, 54 Gy). For unresectable disease the dose was 54-55 Gy (median, 54 Gy). The total dose to target 2 was 45 Gy in all patients. Patients were treated with one of two six-field beam arrangements found to produce superior dose distributions. Capecitabine was given at 1,600 mg/m(2)/day in two divided doses, 5 days per week, concurrently with radiotherapy. In addition, most patients (73%) received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. Systemic chemotherapy was given before, after, or both before and after chemoradiotherapy in 47%, 7%, and 20% of patients, respectively. Patients were evaluated on a weekly basis. RESULTS: Treatment was tolerated well. Grade 1/2 nausea/vomiting developed in 8 patients (53%) and Grade 1/2 hematologic toxicity developed in 9 patients (60%). Only 1 patient (7%) had Grade 3 toxicity, a gastric ulceration that responded to medical management. Nine patients (60%) had weight loss (median, 7 lbs; range, 3-12 lbs). The median follow-up time is 8.5 months (10.1 months in patients who are alive). In the resectable group there have been no deaths, and there has been 1 local relapse (14%). In the unresectable group there have been 2 deaths, and the 1-year actuarial survival rate is 69%. Two patients converted to resectability, 5 patients (62.5%) have persistent locoregional disease after chemoradiotherapy, and 1 patient (12%) is locally controlled without surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen of IMRT with tumor-selective radiosensitization is well tolerated. The low toxicity profile compares favorably with that of protocols based on continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine, and the preliminary indications of efficacy are encouraging.     

Oral vinorelbine and cisplatin with concomitant radiotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a feasibility study

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy has improved survival in inoperable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase I trial was performed in order to establish a dose recommendation for oral vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin and simultaneous radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients with stage IIIB NSCLC received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 66 Gy and 2 cycles of cisplatin and oral vinorelbine which was administered at 3 different levels (40, 50 and 60 mg/m2). This was to be followed by 2 cycles of cisplatin/ vinorelbine oral consolidation chemotherapy. The study goal was to determine the maximal recommended dose of oral vinorelbine during concurrent treatment. RESULTS: 11 stage IIIB patients were entered into the study. The median radiotherapy dose was 66 Gy. Grade 3-4 toxicity included neutropenia, esophagitis, gastritis and febrile neutropenia. The dose-limiting toxicity for concurrent chemoradiotherapy was esophagitis. 9 patients received consolidation chemotherapy, with neutropenia and anemia/thrombocytopenia grade 3 being the only toxicities. The overall response was 73%. CONCLUSION: Oral vinorelbine 50 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, 15 over 4 weeks) in combination with cisplatin 20 mg/m2 (days 1-4) is the recommended dose in combination with radiotherapy (66 Gy) and will be used for concurrent chemoradiotherapy in a forthcoming phase III trial testing the efficacy of consolidation chemotherapy in patients not progressing after chemoradiotherapy.     

Preoperative chemoradiation with oral tegafur within a multidisciplinary therapeutic approach in patients with T3-4 rectal cancer

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity in terms of downstaging histologic patterns of residual tumor and clinical tolerance of a neoadjuvant chemoradiation program with oral tegafur for rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From May 1998 to May 2001, 62 consecutive patients with cT(3-4) or cN(+) rectal cancer, or both, were treated with 45-50 Gy (1.8 Gy/day; 25 fractions) and oral tegafur 1200 mg/day. Surgery was performed 6 weeks after the completion of chemoradiation. All patients received a boost with intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (IOERT) over the presacral space. RESULTS: Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicity consisted on Grade 3 anemia in 1 patient. Nonhematologic toxicity was mild. Fifteen patients (23%) had Grade 3 dermatitis, 16 (25%) had Grade 3, and 2 (3%) had Grade 4 proctitis. The median dose of radiotherapy was 50.4 Gy. Surgery consisted on anterior resection in 38 patients (61%) and abdominoperineal amputation in 24 (39%). Five complete pathologic responses were observed (8%), and 29 patients (47%) had a minimal microscopic residual tumor (mic category). The total downstaging rate was 68%. With a median follow-up of 46 months, the pelvic control rate was 95%, disease-free survival 74.1%, and overall survival 76.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation with oral tegafur is feasible, well tolerated, and active, with the additional advantage of offering the convenience of oral chemotherapy.     

A phase I trial of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver metastases

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A multicenter Phase I clinical trial was conducted. Eligible patients had one to three liver metastases, tumor diameter <6 cm, and adequate liver function. The first cohort received 36 Gy to the planning target volume (PTV) in three fractions (F). Subsequent cohorts received higher doses up to a chosen maximum of 60 Gy/3F. At least 700 mL of normal liver had to receive a total dose <15 Gy. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) included acute Grade 3 liver or intestinal toxicity or any acute Grade 4 toxicity. The MTD was exceeded if 2/6 patients in a cohort experienced DLT. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled (10 male, 8 female): median age, 55 years (range, 26-83 years); most common primary site, colorectal (6 patients); median aggregate gross tumor volume, 18 ml (range, 3-98 ml). Four patients had multiple tumors. No patient experienced a DLT, and dose was escalated to 60 Gy/3F without reaching MTD. CONCLUSIONS: Biologically potent doses of SBRT are well tolerated in patients with limited liver metastases. Results of this study form the basis for an ongoing Phase II SBRT study of 60 Gy over three fractions for liver metastases.