共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 125 毫秒
1.
LEO卫星网络动态混合卫星切换策略 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
LEO卫星网络切换协议中的路由选择策略应当综合考虑路由本身优化性,路由计算复杂性,路由更新的信令代价。提出适合LEO网络卫星切换要求的动态混合路由选择策略(DHRS:DynamicHybridRouteSelection),即发生卫星切换时,由卫星节点根据移动终端用户切换前所处位置和切换前路由表等信息,为移动终端选择合适的路由。 相似文献
2.
3.
首先分别分析了GEO层、MEO层、LEO层卫星的优缺点,接着简述了LEO&MEO双层卫星网络的特点及对路由算法的要求,然后对已有的卫星网络路由算法进行简要分析,最后提出了一套适合LEO&MEO双层卫星网络的动态路由技术。在拓扑快照DT-DVTR路由算法和MLSR的基础上,设计了动态路由算法,该路由算法采用了主动路由和按需路由相结合的方式,使得路由查找时间短、效率高。 相似文献
4.
5.
多层卫星网络链路中断容忍路由策略设计 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
链路中断和接续对卫星网络路由有重要影响,该文针对多层卫星网络,设计了链路中断容忍路由策略,利用非均匀时间段内卫星网络拓扑结构的可预测性进行路由表计算,采取动态的拥塞控制机制和洪泛策略,解决由于卫星运动、通信设备故障引发链路中断情况下的路由问题。仿真结果表明,该路由策略具有较高的链路利用率,能够减少动态路由计算中时延信息收集和星上路由表生成给卫星节点带来的时空开销。 相似文献
6.
在分析传统卫星网络路由算法的基础上,提出一种基于分时的LEO卫星网络无环路由算法(DTRA)。针对卫星在各时间片之间进行路由表切换时可能出现的路由环问题,算法采用平滑路由表切换策略消除由于切换前后网络状态信息不一致而产生环路的可能性,保证分组在任何时刻都能够沿无环最短时延路径被转发。同时,DTRA也能够通过使用无环备份路径处理可能出现的链路拥塞、节点失败等突发情况。通过复杂性分析可知,算法只需较小的星上存储开销和星上处理开销,而无需星问通信开销。仿真实验结果也表明算法能够提供数据最优传送,具有较好的端到端时延性能。 相似文献
7.
LEO网络中卫星切换的动态概率路由优化策略 总被引:5,自引:0,他引:5
在LEO卫星网络中,卫星切换方案需要在保证最小切换延时的同时,合理地使用网络资源,因此应该合理选择卫星切换中路由优化的触发条件。本文在综合考虑卫星切换中消耗的网络资源,包括带宽资源和信令资源的前提下,提出动态概率路由优化方案。指出在卫星切换中,为了达到对网络资源的有效使用,路由优化概率应该随LEO星座结构,呼叫带宽,业务分布等网络参数不同而动态变化。 相似文献
8.
基于Globalstar和Odyssey两个Walker delta星座,建立星间链路网络,重点分析网络中的不同轨道间星间链的动态特性,特别是与星上跟瞄系统密切相关的俯仰角、方位角和链路长度变化,为卫星网络路由提供依据.对传统的卫星路由策略作了改进,利用卫星系统的冗余覆盖的特性,选择不同策略下的最优路径.针对用户不能忍受通信中断的情况,提出考虑消除中断的路由策略,进行服务质量的分析比较.同时也比较在消除中断的路由策略下,LEO同MEO网络差异之处.消除通信中断是以其它QoS性能下降为代价. 相似文献
9.
《电子科技文摘》2001,(1)
Y2000-62480-500 0100507低地球轨道卫星网络的数据报路由选择算法=Data-gram routing algorithm for LEO satellite networks[会,英]/Ekici.E.& Akyildiz,I.F.//2000 IEEE INFO-COM.Vol.2.—500~508(HC)卫星网络提供全局覆盖并支持大范围服务,低地球轨道(LEO)卫星具有短环形距离延迟,因此提高了其重要性,在 LEO 卫星网络中难题之一是开发专门有效的路由选择算法,本文介绍了 LEO 卫星网络数据报路由选择算法,此算法产生最小传播延迟路径,通过模拟评价了算法的性能,并讨论了其健壮性。参8 相似文献
10.
11.
12.
基于Petri网模型方法和仿真方法,对一种低轨/中轨/同步地球轨(LEO/MEO/GEO)三层卫星网络进行了性能分析.首先建立了卫星网络的广义随机Petri网(GSPN)模型,采用SPNP6.0软件进行了网络性能分析.然后,将分析结果与采用OPNET软件对该三层卫星网络模拟的结果进行了比较,验证了模型的正确性,并得出了诸如在高网络负载的情况下三层网络结构的性能优于单层等新的结论. 相似文献
13.
Several IP-based routing algorithms have been developed for low-Earth orbit (LEO) satellite networks in recent years. The performance of the satellite IP networks can be improved drastically if multiple satellite constellations are used in the architecture. A multilayered satellite IP network is introduced that consists of LEO, medium-Earth orbit (MEO) and geostationary Earth orbit (GEO) satellites. A new multilayered satellite routing (MLSR) algorithm is developed that calculates routing tables efficiently using the collected delay measurements. The performance of the multilayered satellite network and MLSR is evaluated through simulations and analysis 相似文献
14.
Analysis of LEO, MEO, and GEO global mobile satellite systems inthe presence of interference and fading 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
Vatalaro F. Corazza G.E. Caini C. Ferrarelli C. 《Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Journal on》1995,13(2):291-300
Several multisatellite and multispot systems have been recently proposed for provision of mobile and personal services with global coverage, adopting GEO or non-GEO (i.e., MEO, LEO) satellite constellations. The paper addresses an in-depth analysis of these constellations, evaluating both geometrical performance measures and cochannel interference levels caused by extensive frequency reuse. The geometrical analysis yields the statistics for coverage, frequency of satellite hand-overs, and link absence periods. The interference analysis is based on a general model valid for all access techniques, which is here applied to the case of FDMA. The outage probability as a function of the specification on carrier-to-interference power ratio is evaluated for four selected constellations. Several techniques are introduced for interference reduction in non-GEO systems, in which the satellites coverage areas may intersect: spot turnoff, intraorbital plane frequency division, and interorbital plane frequency division. The effects of Rice fading have also been analyzed by means of an analytic approximated method. The overall analysis allows a fair comparison between LEO, MEO, and GEO constellations 相似文献
15.
Satellite system architectures based on geostationary or Low Earth Orbit (LEO)/Medium Earth Orbit (MEO) constellation suffer from their intrinsic limitations in terms of coverage or flexibility. Traffic requirements concerning broadband services are expected to be very uneven both in time and space. To match this requirement and to improve coverage an innovative satellite system architecture, composed of a LEO/MEO segment to complement a Geostationary Earth Orbit (GEO) segment, has been proposed. In this scenario, to achieve interworking and to make it possible to hold the call while switching between the two segments, efficient intersegment handover (ISHO) procedures must be identified. The paper, after introducing the classical ISHO schemes, aims at defining and analysing an ISHO procedure developed to perform handover in case of hybrid constellations based on the use of both GEO and LEO/MEO orbits. Performance evaluation will be carried out for different system configurations utilizing a dynamic satellite constellation simulator in the time domain. The execution delay and its complementary cumulative distribution have been evaluated for different constellation geometry at different distances from the gateway. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 相似文献
16.
Grard Maral Jean-Jacques de Ridder Barry G. Evans Madhavendra Richharia 《International Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking》1991,9(4):209-225
It may be that we are now entering the era of LEO constellation satellite communications after thirty years of domination by the GEO systems. This paper heralds the coming of the new era with a tutorial approach to the system design and trade-offs of LEO constellation system design. It discusses orbital configurations, network topologies and routeing considerations, multiple access schemes and link performance design. In so doing it brings out the major design parameters and how they interact with each other. Also considered are the service applications for the LEO constellation systems, and the important difference between real-time and delayed communication systems is highlighted. Examples of single and multi-beam (cellular) coverage system link designs are presented for L-Ka frequency bands. Future papers will consider aspects of the LEO spacecraft and launchers. 相似文献
17.
18.
为了优化GEO与LEO间激光通信系统的性能,建立了卫星通信轨道特性仿真模型。通过对一年内卫星数据的分析可知,卫星通信终端间的多普勒频移变化范围约为5109 Hz,可以使用多普勒频移补偿方法减少GEO与LEO之间的多普勒频移影响。对于相干通信,终端必须进行频移补偿;提前量角的范围大于激光束散角,因此终端需要进行提前量补偿,激光通信系统可根据提前量角对视轴进行提前修正,以减少相对速度对激光通信的影响;太阳干扰和地球遮挡的时间较长,应该进行卫星组网以改善可通率,在通信过程中应根据通信终端时间,优化两个通信终端的工作流程;GEO和LEO终端的视轴变化情况不同,因此应该为卫星设计不同结构。 相似文献
19.
L. S. Golding L. C. Palmer 《International Journal of Satellite Communications and Networking》1992,10(5):283-291
Personal communications (PC) refers to two-way voice (and possibly data) communications to a small hand-held unit, capable of being carried by a person and used in various locations. PC via satellite refers to the case where this hand-held unit communicates directly with a satellite to provide the duplex voice (or data) service. Both geosynchronous earth orbit (GEO) and low earth orbit (LEO) satellites have been considered to provide this service. GEO and LEO satellite systems must compete with existing mobile cellular radio systems both in meeting performance requirements and service costs, if they are to be a significant supplier of PC services. GEO and LEO systems each have unique advantages and disadvantages when used to provide a PC service. While these general characteristics are identified in Section 1 of the paper, a more quantitative comparison is needed. This quantitative comparison is made by comparing a GEO PC satellite system, operating at EHF (Ka-band) frequencies with a LEO system operating at UHF (L-band) frequencies, including service costs for both systems. The two systems used in the comparison are examples of realistic GEO and LEO system designs for PC service, and although it is not exhaustive, the comparison points out some of the key differences between GEO and LEO systems that affect service performance and cost. 相似文献