| 论物权法调整空域使用权的合理性 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘海安 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国民航大学航空法律与政策研究中心 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(18YJC820043)“效率驱动下的空域资源法律调整机制研究”。 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国《物权法》没有明确规定空域所有权,但是应当解释为承认了空域所有权的存在。现行法律没有认可空域使用权的物权属性,只能认为空域使用权是行政许可利益。但行政许可机制的运行与效率价值旨趣相悖,其产生的产权不确定性不利于空域高效利用。市场机制和私权制度的引入是改革的重要方向。国家所有权具有私权属性,空域所有权也不例外,而空域使用权是空域所有权基于权能分离产生的权利,只能具有私权属性。这种定性在价值上也具有合理性,这主要是基于市场机制对空域利用效率的保障作用以及私权属性对市场机制顺畅运作的支撑地位。在私权体系中,将空域使用权规定为物权最为妥当。
|
| 关 键 词： | 空域使用权 物权法 行政许可利益 私权 效率 |
On the Rationality of the Property Law in Adjusting the Right to Use Airspace |
| |
| Authors: | Liu Haian |
| |
| Abstract: | Chinas"Real Right Law"does not clearly define airspace ownership,but should be interpreted as recognizing the existence of airspace ownership.The current law does not recognize the property rights of airspace use rights,and can only be considered that the airspace use rights are administrative license interests.However,the administrational licen?sing institution is inconsistent to the utility value;its resulting uncertainty of property right goes against the airspace usage of high utility.The introduction of the market mechanism and private right institution is the way of reformation.The ownership of country has the nature of private right,including the ownership of airspace.As a right departing from the airspace ownership right,airspace usage right has only the nature of private right.This nature is reasonable,because of the protection of the market mechanism to the usage utility,and of the supporting role of the nature of private right to the market mechanism.In the private right hierarchy,it is appropriate to prescribe airspace usage right as a real right. |
| |
| Keywords: | airspace usage right real right law administrational licensed interest private right utility |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
