Recovery from work‐related effort: A meta‐analysis |
| |
| Authors: | Andrew A. Bennett Arnold B. Bakker James G. Field |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Department of Management, Strome College of Business, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, Virginia, U.S.A.;2. Center of Excellence for Positive Organizational Psychology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands;3. Department of Management, College of Business and Economics, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, U.S.A. |
| |
| Abstract: | This meta‐analytic study examines the antecedents and outcomes of four recovery experiences: psychological detachment, relaxation, mastery, and control. Using 299 effect sizes from 54 independent samples (N = 26,592), we extend theory by integrating recovery experiences into the challenge–hindrance framework, creating a more comprehensive understanding of how both after‐work recovery and work characteristics collectively relate to well‐being. The results of meta‐analytic path estimates indicate that challenge demands have stronger negative relationships with psychological detachment, relaxation, and control recovery experiences than hindrance demands, and job resources have positive relationships with relaxation, mastery, and control recovery experiences. Psychological detachment after work has a stronger negative relationship with fatigue than relaxation or control experiences, whereas control experiences after work have a stronger positive relationship with vigor than detachment or relaxation experiences. Additionally, a temporally driven model with recovery experiences as a partial mediator explains up to 62% more variance in outcomes (ΔR2 = .12) beyond work characteristics models, implying that both work characteristics and after‐work recovery play an important role in determining employee well‐being. |
| |
| Keywords: | challenge– hindrance framework fatigue meta‐analysis recovery experiences vigor |
|
|
