首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     


Case diagnosis as positive identification in prostatic neoplasia
Authors:R Montironi  R Mazzucchelli  A Santinelli  PW Hamilton  D Thompson  PH Bartels
Affiliation:Institute of Pathological Anatomy and Histopathology, University of Ancona, Italy. r.montironi@popcsi.unian.it
Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To apply a distance measure and Bayesian belief network-based methodology to the positive identification of case diagnosis in prostatic neoplasia. STUDY DESIGN: Eight morphologic and cellular features were analyzed in 20 cases of normal prostate, 20 of low grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), 20 of high grade PIN, 20 of prostatic adenocarcinoma with a cribriform pattern and 20 of prostatic adenocarcinoma with an acinar pattern. The diagnostic distance was evaluated to measure the "extent" to which the feature outcomes of the individual cases differed from the expected profile of outcomes in typical cases of normal prostate, low and high grade PIN, and cribriform and large acinar adenocarcinoma. Belief values were evaluated with a Bayesian belief network (BBN). RESULTS: A bivariate representation of the cumulative absolute diagnostic distances of all the cases from the prototypes of normal prostate and cribriform adenocarcinoma was made. Three separate groups of cases were observed, corresponding to normal prostate, low grade PIN and cribriform adenocarcinoma. An additional group was formed by the cases of high grade PIN and acinar adenocarcinoma--i.e., there was complete overlap between the diagnostic distance values of cases belonging to these two categories. However, these cases showed differences in clue outcomes. To explore the contribution of such observations to case identification, a bivariate representation of the diagnostic distances from high grade PIN and acinar adenocarcinoma was made. The cases then formed five separate groups corresponding to the five diagnostic categories. When the individual cases were considered, their shortest distance was from the prototype of the category into which they were originally diagnosed. The BBN gave these diagnostic categories the highest belief values. CONCLUSION: The combined evaluation of diagnostic distance and belief represents an identification procedure. The numeric value of certainty characterizes individual cases according to the level of progression from PIN toward cancer.
Keywords:
本文献已被 PubMed 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号