首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     


Local Variation in Inclusion on Kidney Transplant Waiting Lists: Analysis in the Reference Area of a Kidney Transplant Center
Authors:NG Toapanta Gaibor  G Bernal Blanco  M Cintra Cabrera  A Suarez Benjumea  MA Pérez Valdivia  M Suñer Poblet  FM González Roncero  JL Rocha Castilla  MA Gentil Govantes
Affiliation:Department of Nephrology, Virgen del Rocío University Hospital, Seville, Spain
Abstract:

Background

Access for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients to the renal transplant (RT) waiting list can vary depending on the criteria used and how they are applied in each dialysis unit.

Methods

This study was performed in the reference area (2.5 million inhabitants) of a transplant center. Data were from a regional registry (Information System of the Autonomous Coordination of Transplants in Andalusia) of total dialysis patients. Patients were grouped according to transplant status as: effective waiting list (WL); never recorded or excluded (E); incomplete immunologic study or discharge data (IIS); temporary contraindication (TC); or active (A).

Results

There were 1424 dialysis patients. Of these, 58% were E, 18% were IIS, 14% were TC, and 10% were A. Significant differences were detected for proportion of patients listed as active status (A) in 3 hospital dialysis units (2.9%–13.4%) and 12 hemodialysis centers (4.2%–29.2%); proportion of IIS cases in the hospitals (0%–57%) and dialysis centers (0%–58%); and in proportion of TC cases in the hospitals (19%–50%) and dialysis centers (2.5%–19.3%). The mean age of patients varied significantly between IIS, TC, and A groups (60.3, 54.8, and 52.3 years old, respectively, P < .001). Accentuated differences between the 2 provinces included in the sector were verified. There are notable differences in inclusion of pre-dialysis patients between hospital units.

Conclusion

We detected considerable variability between hospital units and non-hospital dialysis centers in relation to inclusion on the active transplant waiting list and the proportion of patients with IIS or TC status. It is essential to implement a more homogeneous system for case selection through a specific intervention program from the reference center.
Keywords:Address correspondence to Néstor Gabriel Toapanta Gaibor  MD  Department of Nephrology  Virgen del Rocío University Hospital  PC 42013  Seville  Spain  
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号