Administrative Reform Policy: The Challenges of Turning Symbols into Practice |
| |
Authors: | Christensen Tom Lægreid Per |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Political Science, University of Oslo, Norway;(2) Department of Administration and Organization Theory and Rokkan-centre, University of Bergen, Norway |
| |
Abstract: | Administrative reform policies are often characterized by a large number of reform symbols. While these are generally aimed at furthering the legitimacy of the political leadership, they can have the opposite effect and generate problems in implementing reform practice. This paper starts by discussing the theory of reform symbols and relates it to theories of instrumental, negotiation and cultural features of reforms. We illustrate this discussion by analyzing interview data collected among the central political and administrative elite in Norway. The analysis shows the relevance of reform symbols even in Norway, a country with a reluctant reform tradition and few incentives for reform. The respondents often perceived reform symbols as negative, something that creates problems for the political leadership in reconciling symbols with practice and leads it to engage in double-talk. Political and administrative leaders on different levels have differing attitudes towards administrative reform symbols, reflecting different roles and perspectives. The conclusion is that symbols are a main feature of administrative reform but also that reforms are not only symbols. Symbols matter, but turning symbols into practice is not an easy task to do. |
| |
Keywords: | administrative reforms symbols |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|