首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     


A comparison of techniques for generating forest ownership spatial products
Affiliation:1. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 160 Holdsworth Way, Amherst, MA 01003, USA;2. USDA Forest Service/University of Massachusetts Amherst Family Forest Research Center, 160 Holdsworth Way, Amherst, MA 01003, USA;3. USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station, 1992 Folwell Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA;1. Unit of Sustainable Forest Management, Department of Vegetal Production, University of Santiago de Compostela, E-27002 Lugo, Spain;2. Subdirección General de Recursos Forestales, Xunta de Galicia, E-15704 Santiago de Compostela, Spain;3. Department Forest Inventory and Remote Sensing, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Büsgenweg 5, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany;4. Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, University of Santiago de Compostela, E-27002 Lugo, Spain;1. Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-8526, USA;2. The Nature Conservancy, Graha Iskandarsyah 3rd Floor, Jakarta, Indonesia;3. The Nature Conservancy, 4245 Fairfax Drive, TNC, Arlington, VA 22203, USA;1. School of Computing Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China;2. School of Literature and Journalism, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China;3. Hunan Province Engineering Technology Research Center of Computer Vision and Intelligent Medical Treatment, Changsha 410083, China;1. Normandie Univ, UR, ECODIV-EA 1293, Fédération de Recherche SCALE-FED 4116, F-76821 Mont Saint Aignan Cedex, France;2. Normandie Univ, Laboratoire de Microbiologie Signaux et Micr?nvironnement EA 4312, Université de Rouen, F-76821 Mont Saint Aignan Cedex, France;3. CEFE 1919, route de Mende, sur le campus du CNRS, 34293 Montpellier 5, France;1. Department of Construction Engineering, Engineering and Architecture School, University of Zaragoza, María de Luna, s/n, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain;2. Department of Construction Engineering, University of Oviedo, Edificio Departamental Viesques n° 7, 33204 Gijón, Spain
Abstract:To fully understand forest resources, it is imperative to understand the social context in which the forests exist. A pivotal part of that context is the forest ownership. It is the owners, operating within biophysical and social constraints, who ultimately decide if the land will remain forested, how the resources will be used, and by whom. Forest ownership patterns vary substantially across the United States. These distributions are traditionally represented with tabular statistics that fail to capture the spatial patterns of ownership. Existing spatial products are not sufficient for many strategic-level planning needs because they are not electronically available for large areas (e.g., parcels maps) or do not provide detailed ownership categories (e.g., only depict private versus public ownership). Thiessen polygon, multinomial logit, and classification tree methods were tested for producing a forest ownership spatial dataset across four states with divergent ownership patterns: Alabama, Arizona, Michigan, and Oregon. Over 17,000 sample points with classified forest ownership, collected as part of the USDA Forest Service, Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program, were divided into two datasets, one used as the dependent variable across all of the models and 10 percent of the points were retained for validation across the models. Additional model inputs included a polygon coverage of public lands from the Conservation Biology Institute’s Protected Areas Database (PAD) and data representing human population pressures, road densities, forest characteristics, land cover, and other attributes. The Thiessen polygon approach predicted ownership patterns based on proximity to the sample points in the model dataset and subsequent combining with the PAD ownership data layer. The multinomial logit and classification tree approaches predicted the ownership at the validation points based on the PAD ownership information and data representing human population, road, forest, land cover, and other attributes. The percentage of validation points across the four states correctly predicted ranged from 76.3 to 78.9 among the methods with corresponding weighted kappa values ranging from 0.73 to 0.76. Different methods performed slightly, but statistically significantly, better in different states Overall, the Thiessen polygon method was deemed preferable because: it has a lower bias towards dominant ownership categories; requires fewer inputs; and is simpler to implement.
Keywords:Thiessen polygon  Multinomial logit  Classification tree  United States  Forest inventory and analysis  Protected areas database  FIA"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0045"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"Forest inventory and analysis program of the United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service  NLCD"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0055"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"National Land Cover Database  PAD"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0065"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"Protected Areas Database  USDA-FS"}  {"#name":"keyword"  "$":{"id":"kwrd0075"}  "$$":[{"#name":"text"  "_":"United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号