首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

反语语用机制再考察——传统语用学与认知语用学对反语语用机制考察对比浅析
引用本文:那剑,赵成平.反语语用机制再考察——传统语用学与认知语用学对反语语用机制考察对比浅析[J].重庆电力高等专科学校学报,2006,11(2):41-45.
作者姓名:那剑  赵成平
作者单位:重庆大学外国语学院,重庆,400044
摘    要:传统语用学认为反语是说话人出于礼貌违反质量准则而产生的;反语是一种间接言语行为,一种“戴了面纱的”威胁面子的言语行为。认知语用学从反语的复现性视角将其与Grice的反语观做了对比,指出反语为对非说话人的思想的复现和二级解释的认知语用学理论,能较有说服力地阐释反语的本质特征和语用机制,弥补传统语用学反语观的不足。

关 键 词:反语  质量准则  言语行为  复现性  花园路径过程
文章编号:1008-8032(2006)02-0041-05
收稿时间:03 21 2006 12:00AM
修稿时间:2006年3月21日

Reinvestigation of the Pragmatic Mechanism of Irony——Comparative Study of Irony with the Perspective of Traditional Pragmatics and Cognitive Pragmatics
NA Jian,ZHAO Cheng-ping.Reinvestigation of the Pragmatic Mechanism of Irony——Comparative Study of Irony with the Perspective of Traditional Pragmatics and Cognitive Pragmatics[J].Journal of Chongqing Electric Power College,2006,11(2):41-45.
Authors:NA Jian  ZHAO Cheng-ping
Affiliation:Foreign Language School of Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044
Abstract:Traditional pragmatics investigates irony from the perspective of the cooperative principle, politeness principle and speech act theory. Cognitive pragmatics put forward the irony-related cognitive pragmatic theory, which regards irony as an echo or two- degree interpretations of someone other than of the speaker, has persuasively interpreted the essence and pragmatic mechanism of irony and compensated for the inadequacies of traditional pragmatic theory of irony.
Keywords:irony  q uality maxim  s peech act  e choic  garden- path process
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号