首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

重庆市生态风险预警等级划分及演化趋势模拟
引用本文:曹佳梦,官冬杰,黄大楠,殷博灵,和秀娟.重庆市生态风险预警等级划分及演化趋势模拟[J].生态学报,2022,42(16):6579-6594.
作者姓名:曹佳梦  官冬杰  黄大楠  殷博灵  和秀娟
作者单位:重庆交通大学建筑与城市规划学院, 重庆 400074
基金项目:重庆市自然科学基金杰出青年基金项目(cstc2020jcyj-jqX0004);国家社科基金后期资助项目(20FJYB035);教育部人文社科一般项目(20YJA790016)
摘    要:生态风险预警等级评估和演化趋势模拟,可为生态风险管理提供可靠的辅助决策。以重庆市为研究对象,基于驱动力-压力-状态-影响-响应模型,构建重庆市生态风险预警指标体系,采用正态云模型和集对分析法,定量分析重庆市生态风险时空分异特征和演化趋势。研究结果表明:(1)2013-2019年,重庆市生态风险值呈"上升-下降"的波动趋势,综合生态风险隶属于重警等级,生态风险综合值从0.295下降到0.278,生态环境逐年好转;(2)重庆市生态风险有下降、不变、先上升后降低、先降低后上升以及一直升高5种演化趋势,分别占比39%、16%、5%、21%、24%;(3)重庆市生态风险转移分为两个方向,2013-2016年生态风险空间分异性增大,中警、轻警和无警风险等级不断向东北、东南和西部四周分散转移;2016-2019年生态风险分布格局变化较小,重警风险区在东部聚集;(4)演化趋势模拟结果表明,未来重庆市生态风险降低的区县有13个,占比34%,生态环境有向好发展的趋势;生态风险上升的区县有25个,占比66%,生态环境会有所恶化,但是恶化程度较低。将生态风险等级划分与预警演化趋势相结合,能为城市生态风险管理提供科学依据。

关 键 词:生态风险评价  预警  正态云模型  集对分析
收稿时间:2021/8/3 0:00:00
修稿时间:2022/2/16 0:00:00

Classification of ecological risk warning levels and simulation of evolutionary trends in Chongqing Municipality
CAO Jiameng,GUAN Dongjie,HUANG Danan,YIN Boling,HE Xiujuan.Classification of ecological risk warning levels and simulation of evolutionary trends in Chongqing Municipality[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2022,42(16):6579-6594.
Authors:CAO Jiameng  GUAN Dongjie  HUANG Danan  YIN Boling  HE Xiujuan
Affiliation:School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Chongqing Jiaotong University, Chongqing 400074, China
Abstract:The level assessment on the ecological risk early warning and the simulation on evolutionary trend can provide reliable auxiliary decision making for the ecological risk management. Taking into account the Driving-Pressure-State-Impact-Response model, this paper establishes an index system for ecological risk early warning to quantitatively analyze the temporal and spatial differentiation characteristics and evolution trend of ecological risk in Chongqing Municipality, using the normal cloud model and the set-pair analysis method. The results demonstrate that:(1) from 2013 to 2019, the ecological risk value of Chongqing presented a "rise-decline" fluctuation trend, and the comprehensively ecological risk was ranked as heavy warning level, while the comprehensive ecological risk value decreased from 0.295 to 0.278, denoting that the ecological environment had been improved. (2) There were five evolutionary trends of ecological risk in Chongqing:decreasing, unchanged, increasing-decreasing, decreasing-increasing and always increasing, accounting for 39%, 16%, 5%, 21% and 24% of all regions, respectively. (3) The ecological risk transferred to ward two orientations in Chongqing. From 2013 to 2016, the medium-alert, light-alert and no-alert risk areas continued to spread to the northeast, southeast and west of Chongqing, which intensified the spatial differentiation of ecological risks; whereas from 2016 to 2019, the high-alert risk areas were concentrated in the east, suggesting the little change in the ecological risk distribution pattern. (4) The simulation results of evolution trend revealed that 13 counties, accounting for 34% of all areas, would experience the declining ecological risk and subsequently improving ecological environment in Chongqing in the future; additionally 25 counties, accounting for 66%, would maintain the deterioration of ecological environment to small extent. The combination of ecological risk classification with early warning evolutionary trend can contribute a scientific basis to urban ecological risk management.
Keywords:ecological risk assessment  warning  normal cloud model  set pair analysis
点击此处可从《生态学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《生态学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号