首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

2017—2019年河北省放射卫生行政处罚案件情况分析
引用本文:冯冬颖,董振军,尹俊清,沈爱国,申立军,段杏丽,畅晋.2017—2019年河北省放射卫生行政处罚案件情况分析[J].中国辐射卫生,2020,29(4):395-397.
作者姓名:冯冬颖  董振军  尹俊清  沈爱国  申立军  段杏丽  畅晋
作者单位:河北省卫生健康委员会综合监督服务中心, 河北 石家庄 050071
摘    要:目的 对2017—2019年河北省的放射卫生行政处罚案件情况进行研究分析,了解河北省近3年来放射卫生监督执法现状及查处中发现的主要问题,以期为提升监管效能提供有效数据和理论基础。方法 收集2017—2019年河北省卫生行政处罚案件情况,从案件来源、处罚主体、处罚类型、处罚案由等方面进行汇总分析。结果 2017—2019年河北省放射卫生行政处罚案件共计658起,以监督检查来源最多612起(占93.01%),处罚主体主要为二级医疗机构394起(占59.88%),以一般程序为主419起(占63.68%),处罚案由以未如期进行校验/超范围从事放射诊疗工作为主。结论 应充分认识卫生监督的重要性,加大放射卫生行政执法力度,强化放射知识和法律法规培训宣传,提升依法办案的水平,确保卫生行政处罚合法、合理、公平、公正进行。

关 键 词:放射卫生  行政处罚  案件  分析  
收稿时间:2020-01-19

Analysis of administrative penalties cases for radiation health in Hebei Province from 2017 to 2019
FENG Dongying,DONG Zhenjun,YIN Junqing,SHEN Aiguo,SHEN Lijun,DUAN Xingli,CHANG Jin.Analysis of administrative penalties cases for radiation health in Hebei Province from 2017 to 2019[J].Chinese Journal of Radiological Health,2020,29(4):395-397.
Authors:FENG Dongying  DONG Zhenjun  YIN Junqing  SHEN Aiguo  SHEN Lijun  DUAN Xingli  CHANG Jin
Affiliation:Hebei Municipal Inspection and Service Center for Health Commission, Shijiazhuang 050071 China
Abstract:Objective Through analyzing the administrative penalties cases of radiation health in Hebei from 2017 to 2019, to understand the radiation health supervision status of Hebei Province in recent years, so the data support and theoretical basis for improving regulatory effectiveness would be provided.Methods The information of administrative penalties cases for radiation health in Hebei Province from 2017 to 2019 was collected, and then statistical analysis was carried out form the aspects of cases source, punishment subject, punishment type and punishment cause.Results There were totally 658 administrative penalties cases for radiation health in Hebei from 2017 to 2019, in which 612 cases were found from the health supervision and management were found, accounting for 93.01% and the main body of punishment was the second medical institutions (394 cases, accounting for 59.88%). 419 cases were of general procedures type, accounting for 63.68%. The punishment cases were mainly due to engagement in radiological diagnosis and treatment by failing to check or exceed the approved scope.Conclusion It is necessary to fully understand the importance of radiological health supervision, increase the law enforcement of radiation health, strengthen the training and publicity of radiology knowledge, laws and regulations, and enhance the level of handling cases according to law, so the legitimacy, reasonability, fairness and justice of the health administrative penalties would be ensured.
Keywords:Radiological Health  Administrative Penalties  Case  Analysis  
点击此处可从《中国辐射卫生》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国辐射卫生》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号