首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

中国大陆地震低活动异常及其在中期预测中的效能研究
引用本文:张国民,尹晓菲,王芃,邵志刚. 中国大陆地震低活动异常及其在中期预测中的效能研究[J]. 地震, 2019, 39(2): 1-10
作者姓名:张国民  尹晓菲  王芃  邵志刚
作者单位:中国地震局地震预测研究所, 北京 100036
基金项目:国家重点研发计划(2017YFC1500501)
摘    要:在对中国大陆地震活动的分析研究中发现, 在某些大地震发生前的一、 两年中, 中国大陆往往出现地震活动显著平静的低活动异常。 本文应用最近100 a(1918—2017年)间5级以上地震资料, 分析地震低活动异常与未来一、 两年中国大陆地震活动的关系。 从M≥5.0地震的年频度、 年度最大地震震级、 6级以上地震的平静等方面建立了地震低活动异常的判据指标, 并从概率增益指数β、 预测效能比α、 地震预测R值评分等方面对地震低活动异常与未来大震关系作了多参数检验。 初步研究结果显示, 地震低活动异常与未来一、 两年中国大陆地震活动有一定的关系, 主要表现为其与8级左右(M≥7.8)巨大地震具有一定的相关性, 但其关联度较低, 概率增益指数β与预测效能比α为3左右, R值评分为0.2左右。 对于M<7.5的地震, 地震低活动异常未显示, 其概率增益β, R值评分接近于0, 似呈现为近于随机关系。 M7.5是开始显示地震低活动异常与其有一定相关性的转折点。

关 键 词:地震中期预测   地震低活动异常   多参数检验   中国大陆  
收稿时间:2018-10-16

Low Seismicity Anomaly and its Efficiency in Mid-term Earthquake Forecasting in Chinese Mainland
ZHANG Guo-min,YIN Xiao-fei,WANG Peng,SHAO Zhi-gang. Low Seismicity Anomaly and its Efficiency in Mid-term Earthquake Forecasting in Chinese Mainland[J]. China Earthguake Engineering Journal, 2019, 39(2): 1-10
Authors:ZHANG Guo-min  YIN Xiao-fei  WANG Peng  SHAO Zhi-gang
Affiliation:Institute of Earthquake Forecasting, CEA, Beijing 100036, China
Abstract:From the study of seismicity in Chinese mainland, we found that obvious low seismicity anomalies occur 1~2 years before some strong earthquakes. Using M≥5.0 seismic data in recent 100 years, in this paper the relations between low seismicity anomaly and future seismicity of Chinese mainland were analyzed. We established low seismicity indicator from annual frequency of M≥5.0 earthquakes, the maximum earthquake magnitude, and M≥6.0 seismic quiescence. Furthermore, the relations between low seismicity anomaly and future strong earthquakes were checked through probabilistic gain index β, predicting efficiency ratio α and R value for earthquake forecasting efficiency testing. Preliminary results indicate that some coefficients exist between low seismicity anomaly and future seismicity in Chinese mainland, mainly reflected in M≥7.8 huge earthquakes. However, the coefficients of M≥7.8 huge earthquakes are limited, and probabilistic gain index β and predicting efficiency ratio α are about 3, R value for earthquake forecasting efficiency testing is about 0.2. For M<7.5 earthquakes, low seismicity anomaly is not exhibited, its probabilistic gain index β and predicting efficiency ratio α are near 0, which appear as random relations. The turning point at which some relations with low seismicity anomaly show is M7.5.
Keywords:Seismicity in Chinese mainland   Low seismicity anomaly   Multi-parameter test   Mid-term forecasting  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《地震》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《地震》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号