马克思价值转形问题上中国人数学解法的无效创意

转形问题长期陷入数学求证困境,所得到的各种结果与中外研究者所投入的时间和精力不能成正比。本文列举的中国人的三种解法,各有其特点。既要识别真伪性,也要识别合理性与不合理性。三种解法都以"西方构思"为本源,做出一点点创新(新的未必就不是伪的或不合理的),但都没有突破"西方构思"的基本框架。西方学者刻意追求数学证明,往往又止步在证伪"两个等于"。数学求证有一定的局限性。突破其局限性,不是数学技巧问题,而是数学思维问题。但是,改变数学思维终归替代不了从数学求证转换到非数学求证。

The Ineffective Innovation of Chinese Mathematical Solution in Marx Value Conversion Problem

The conversion problem has fallen into a difficult situation for a long time.The result that Chinese and foreign researchers concluded were not in proposition with the time and energy they have spent.In this paper,we list three solutions from Chinese researchers,each of which has its points.Not only we need to identify their authenticity or not,but also we must recognize their rationality or not.All the three solutions derived from "western conception",make a little innovation(new things do not mean they were fabricated or irrational) but never go out of the framework of "western conception".Western learners sedulously pursue mathematical proving,but more often they linger on proving "two equations" false.Indeed,mathematical proving has its limitation.What we need to do to break this limitation is not mathematical technique,but mathematical thought.However,the change of mathematical thought cannot,above all,substitute for the change from mathematical proving to non-mathematical proving.