首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

利用有限元分析预警经阴道分娩瘢痕子宫破裂风险
引用本文:马新刚,于迎春,孟颜颜,贺磊. 利用有限元分析预警经阴道分娩瘢痕子宫破裂风险[J]. 医用生物力学, 2021, 36(1): 92-95
作者姓名:马新刚  于迎春  孟颜颜  贺磊
作者单位:淄博市妇幼保健院 手术麻醉科;山东理工大学 机械工程学院
基金项目:淄博市科技发展计划项目(2016kj010029)
摘    要:目的 应用有限元法分析瘢痕子宫受力与瘢痕厚度及位置的关系,研究瘢痕子宫破裂风险因素.方法 首先基于孕期为40周孕妇子宫尺寸应用SolidWorks建立瘢痕厚度和位置可变的子宫三维模型,然后在ANSYS软件中设置宫内压力,压力范围为4.83~ 23.9 kPa,计算子宫受力.结果 在宫缩过程中,最大应力位于子宫瘢痕处,瘢...

关 键 词:瘢痕子宫  瘢痕厚度  切口位置  破裂预警  有限元分析
收稿时间:2020-03-31
修稿时间:2020-04-28

Rupture Warning of Scar Uterus in Vaginal Delivery by Finite Element Analysis
MA Xingang,YU Yingchun,MENG Yanyan,HE Lei. Rupture Warning of Scar Uterus in Vaginal Delivery by Finite Element Analysis[J]. Journal of Medical Biomechanics, 2021, 36(1): 92-95
Authors:MA Xingang  YU Yingchun  MENG Yanyan  HE Lei
Affiliation:(Department of Surgical Anaesthesia,Zibo Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Zibo 255000,Shandong,China;School of Mechanical Engineering,Shandong University of Technology,Zibo 255000,Shandong,China)
Abstract:Objective To analyze the relationship between scar uterine stress and scar thickness/position by using finite element method, so as to study risk factors of scar uterus rupture. Methods Firstly, SolidWorks was used to establish a three-dimensional (3D) model of the uterus with variable scar thickness and position based on uterine size of the pregnant woman at 40th week of gestation, and then the intrauterine pressure was set in the ANSYS software with pressure range of 4.83-23.9 kPa to calculate the uterine stress. Results During the contraction process, the maximum stress was located in uterine scar, the maximum stress on the uterus with scar thickness smaller than 3 mm was greater than tensile strength of the uterus; 3 mm was used as thickness limit of the lower uterine body. If the thickness was smaller than 3 mm, cesarean section should be selected immediately. Otherwise, transvaginal delivery could be selected. When the scar thickness was 3.0 mm, the maximum stress experienced by the uterus decreased at first and then increased with the distance from the uterine floor increasing. The stress at the uterine scar was the smallest when the distance from the uterine floor was 295 mm; when the scar was 285-305 mm from the uterine floor, the ultimate stress on the scar was smaller than its tensile strength, and it was safer to choose a vaginal delivery. Conclusions Risk factors of scar uterine rupture were studied based on ANSYS finite element analysis. The analysis results were consistent with the clinical data, which provided analysis method and theoretical guidance for the choice of delivery method in clinic.
Keywords:scar uterus   scar thickness   incision position   rupture warning   finite element analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《医用生物力学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《医用生物力学》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号