首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

基于参与式制图的城市保护地生态系统文化服务价值评价——以上海共青森林公园为例
引用本文:彭婉婷,刘文倩,蔡文博,王鑫,黄智,吴承照.基于参与式制图的城市保护地生态系统文化服务价值评价——以上海共青森林公园为例[J].生态学杂志,2019,30(2):439-448.
作者姓名:彭婉婷  刘文倩  蔡文博  王鑫  黄智  吴承照
作者单位:1.同济大学建筑与城市规划学院, 上海 200092;;2.英国赫尔大学环境科学学院, 赫尔 HU6 7RX;;3.牛津大学大数据研究中心, 牛津 OX1 3PS
基金项目:本文由国家社会科学重点基金项目(14AZD107)和国家自然科学基金项目(51278347)资助
摘    要:生态系统服务价值定量化评价及其空间制图可以为确定生态系统文化服务(CES)优先保护地域提供有效途径.本研究以上海共青森林公园为例,采用问卷和结构式访谈结合参与式制图(PPGIS)方法,将非货币CES价值和空间信息结合,把丰度、多样性和稀有度指数转化为空间生态综合指数,定量评价了CES价值及其空间分布,识别出优先保护地域.结果表明: 不同景观类型的CES价值分布不同,共青森林公园美学服务价值主要分布在相对开阔的草地、滨水和疏林区,滨水区具有较高的社会关系和灵感价值.多样性较高价值区主要沿湖滨水分布,而稀有度价值较高区域多分布在森林和草地区.通过对8个梯度阈值生态指数的最高值区域进行叠加,验证了25%为有效划分阈值,能够更准确划分公园CES优先保护范围.该方法引入公众参与,实现了使用者体验的空间化、定量化、类型化,建立了景观、空间、体验的地域关系,可为城市保护地优先保护地域划分及其规划管理提供重要依据.

关 键 词:城市自然保护地  生态系统文化服务价值  非货币价值定量评价  空间制图  参与式制图法
收稿时间:2018-03-31

Evaluation of ecosystem cultural services of urban protected areas based on public participation GIS (PPGIS): A case study of Gongqing Forest Park in Shanghai,China.
PENG Wan-ting,LIU Wen-qian,CAI Wen-bo,WANG Xin,HUANG Zhi,WU Cheng-zhao.Evaluation of ecosystem cultural services of urban protected areas based on public participation GIS (PPGIS): A case study of Gongqing Forest Park in Shanghai,China.[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2019,30(2):439-448.
Authors:PENG Wan-ting  LIU Wen-qian  CAI Wen-bo  WANG Xin  HUANG Zhi  WU Cheng-zhao
Affiliation:1.College of Architecture and Urban Planning, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China;;2.School of Environmental Sciences, University of Hull,Hull HU6 7RX, United Kingdom;;3.Institute of Big Data, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom
Abstract:Quantitative evaluation of ecosystem service value and its spatial mapping is an effective way to determine priority conservation areas of cultural ecosystem services (CES). We used a combination of questionnaires and structured interviews with public participatory GIS (PPGIS) in Gongqing Forest Park in Shanghai to connect non-monetary CES values with spatially explicit information. This method applied spatial indicators of abundance, diversity and rarity to quantitatively assess the value of CES and their spatial distribution, and identified priority CES areas. The results showed the value of CES varied among landscape types. Relatively open grassland, riverside, and shrub areas were associated with high aesthetic value. Riverside areas were associated with the CES category concerned with inspiration and supporting social relationships. High diversity values mainly distributed in riverside areas, while forest and grassland areas were associated with high rarity values. The areas with the highest values for the abundance, diversity, and rarity indices were overlaid with eight gradient thresholds, which indicated that defining the 25% of ecological areas with the highest overall rating as CES priority areas was an effective threshold for CES identification and management. The methodology in this study leveraged PPGIS to spatially refe-rence, quantify, and user perception to establish relationships between landscape attributes, space, and experience. These results could provide an important basis for identifying, planning for, and managing priority conservation areas in urban protected areas.
Keywords:urban protected area  cultural ecosystem services value  non-monetary value evaluation  spatial mapping  public participation GIS
点击此处可从《生态学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《生态学杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号