首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

超声联合增强CT诊断卵巢甲状腺肿
引用本文:石喻,郭启勇,李悦,孙佳星,高玉颖,李加慧,李秋菊. 超声联合增强CT诊断卵巢甲状腺肿[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2014, 30(3): 441-445
作者姓名:石喻  郭启勇  李悦  孙佳星  高玉颖  李加慧  李秋菊
作者单位:中国医科大学附属盛京医院放射科, 辽宁 沈阳 110004;中国医科大学附属盛京医院放射科, 辽宁 沈阳 110004;中国医科大学附属盛京医院病理科, 辽宁 沈阳 110004;中国医科大学附属盛京医院超声科, 辽宁 沈阳 110004;中国医科大学附属盛京医院放射科, 辽宁 沈阳 110004;中国医科大学附属盛京医院放射科, 辽宁 沈阳 110004;中国医科大学附属盛京医院放射科, 辽宁 沈阳 110004
基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目(81271566)。
摘    要:目的 探讨超声联合增强CT诊断卵巢甲状腺肿(SO)的价值。方法 回顾性分析17例经手术病理证实的SO患者的声像图及增强CT特点,并与病理结果对照。结果 17例包括良性14例及恶性3例SO,其中10例囊实混合性,6例多囊性,1例单纯实性。超声于6例肿瘤实性部分发现 "甲状腺肿突起",CT值35~82 HU[平均(61.5±12.1)HU];囊性部分呈无回声或低回声,对应CT值13~89 HU[平均(43.4±22.7)HU];其中7例含"高密度囊"(CT值>50 HU)。CT增强显示14例实性成分及囊壁强化,其中9例明显强化或呈特征性"甲状腺样强化",对应的CDFI未见明显血流。结论 SO多为囊性或囊实性肿块;实性成分显著强化结合CDFI少量血流信号不一致、囊液CT值增高结合声像图无回声或低回声不一致可能是SO的特异性影像学表现。

关 键 词:卵巢甲状腺肿  体层摄影术,X线计算机  超声检查,多普勒,彩色
收稿时间:2013-09-08
修稿时间:2014-01-16

Ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced CT in diagnosis of struma ovarii
SHI Yu,GUO Qi-yong,LI Yue,SUN Jia-xing,GAO Yu-ying,LI Jia-hui and LI Qiu-ju. Ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced CT in diagnosis of struma ovarii[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology, 2014, 30(3): 441-445
Authors:SHI Yu  GUO Qi-yong  LI Yue  SUN Jia-xing  GAO Yu-ying  LI Jia-hui  LI Qiu-ju
Affiliation:Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China;Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China;Department of Pathology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China;Department of Ultrasound, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China;Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China;Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China;Department of Radiology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China
Abstract:Objective To explore the value of ultrasonography (US) and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in diagnosis of struma ovarii (SO). Methods Totally 17 patients with SO proved by pathology underwent US and CECT. Features of US and CECT were analyzed retrospectively and compared with pathological results. Results Of 17 cases, 14 SO were benign and 3 were papillary carcinoma. The tumors appeared as solid-cystic mass in 10 cases, cystic mass in 6 cases, and solid mass in 1 case. The solid portion of tumors showed parenchymal echogenicity with "struma pearls" in 6 cases, and the average attenuation on plain CT was 35-82 HU (mean [61.5±12.1] HU). The cyst portion of tumors had variable attenuation on plain CT (13-89 HU, mean [43.4±22.7] HU). Plain CT value of SO were higher than 50 HU in 7 cases, whereas present as anechogenicity or hypoechogenicity on ultrasonograms. On CECT, strong or very strong enhancement like thyroid was found in 9 cases, but the tumors did not have abundant blood supply on CDFI. Conclusion SO tends to appear as cystic-solid or multilocular cystic mass. Specific imaging features, including strong enhancement of solid components on CECT but without abundant blood flow on Doppler images, variable attenuation of cystic components with anechogenicity or hypoechogenicity on ultrasonograms are hints on diagnosing SO.
Keywords:Struma ovarii  Tomography, X-ray computed  Ultrasonography, Doppler, color
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国医学影像技术》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国医学影像技术》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号