经桡动脉与经股动脉途径行冠脉造影和介入治疗的对比研究

目的 探讨经桡动脉与经股动脉途径行冠脉造影及介入治疗（PCI）的优缺点。方法 选取2005年8月至2006年3月在我院行冠脉造影及介入治疗的患者共110例，按入路血管分为桡动脉组和股动脉组，对比手术成功率、手术操作时间、X线曝光时间、并发症发生率，并进行统计学处理。结果 手术成功率、手术操作时间、X线曝光时间、冠脉并发症发生率差异无显著性，血管穿刺部位并发症发生率差异有非常显著性。结论 经桡动脉途径行冠脉造影及介入治疗是安全、有效、可行的。

Comparative study of coronary angiography and intervention treatment through radial and femoral arteries

Objective To explore advantages and shortcomings of coronary angiography and intervention treatment(PCI)through radial and femoral arteries.Methods 110 cases who were performed coronary angiography and intervention treatment through radial and femoral arteries between August,2005 and March,2006 in our hospital were selected,which were divided into group of radial artery and group of femoral artery according to inlet arteries.Success rate of operation,operation time,X-ray exposure time,and incidence rate of complications were compared between the two groups,which were handled according to statistical method.Results There were no differences in success rate of operation,operation time,X-ray exposure time,and incidence rate of complications.And there was remarkable difference in the incidence rate of postoperative complications at sites of puncture at blood vessels.Conclusion Coronary angiography and intervention treatment through radial artery is safe,effective,and feasible.