首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

基本公共卫生服务均等化评价指标体系的实证研究
引用本文:于勇,陶立坚,杨土保. 基本公共卫生服务均等化评价指标体系的实证研究[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2015, 40(4): 421-427
作者姓名:于勇  陶立坚  杨土保
作者单位:1. 中南大学公共卫生学院,长沙410078;2. 湖南农业大学公共管理与法学学院,长沙410128;
3. 中南大学湘雅医学院,长沙410013
摘    要:目的:将构建的基本公共卫生服务均等化评价指标体系用于实践,检验其实用价值。方法:采用专家评分法构建指标体系,以湖南省某市为调研对象,明确每一条指标的数据来源和采集方式,用现实的数据检验指标体系的信度与效度,并运用层次分析法和TOPSIS法对某市9区县进行综合评价与排序。结果:指标体系信度检验的克朗巴赫α系数为0.750,效度检验运用因子分析法提取5个公因子,其累计贡献率达到89.32%。采用层次分析法和TOPSIS法对湖南省某市9区县基本公共卫生服务均等化的状况进行排序的结果非常相近,仅两个区的位置出现差异。结论:本研究构建的指标体系具有良好的效度和信度,能够对目前的基本公共卫生服务状况进行客观的衡量。

关 键 词:基本公共卫生服务  均等化  评价指标体系  

Evaluation index system for equalization of basic public health services
YU Yong , TAO Lijian , YANG Tubao. Evaluation index system for equalization of basic public health services[J]. Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences, 2015, 40(4): 421-427
Authors:YU Yong    TAO Lijian    YANG Tubao
Affiliation:1. School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha 410078; 2. College of Public Administration and Law, Hunan Agricultural
University, Changsha 410128; 3. Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China
Abstract:Objective: To establish the evaluation index system for equalization of basic public health servicesand to test its value in practice.Methods: We developed the index system through expert scored evaluationand then chose a city inHunan for the research object. Th e sources of data and the methods of collection for each indicatorwere identifi ed. Th e reliability and validity of index system was tested. Th e methods of AHP (analytichierarchy process) and TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution)were applied to comprehensively evaluate the public health services among nine counties in thecity.Results: Th e Cronbach′s alpha coeffi cient, which described reliability test result on evaluation indexsystem for equalization of basic public health services, was 0.750. Th e cumulative contribution ratereached 89.32% after validity test with extraction of 5 common factors through factor-analysis. Thesorting results from AHP or TOPSIS method are very close except two districts.Conclusion: Evaluation index system for equalization of basic public health services established inthis study is in good validity and reliability, which can be objectively applied to analyze the currentstatus of basic public health services.
Keywords:basic public health service  equalization  evaluation index system
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中南大学学报(医学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中南大学学报(医学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号