首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

堆载预压和真空堆载联合预压的比较
引用本文:张世民,何瑜琳. 堆载预压和真空堆载联合预压的比较[J]. 重庆建筑大学学报, 2016, 38(Z2): 74-78
作者姓名:张世民  何瑜琳
作者单位:浙江大学 城市学院,杭州 310011,浙江大学 城市学院,杭州 310012
摘    要:堆载预压和真空联合堆载预压都是工程中处理软土地基的常用方法。通过舟山富通电缆项目地基处理工程项目中堆载预压和真空联合堆载预压施工的比较研究,得出真空联合堆载预压比堆载预压具有更高的施工成效效率,更好的沉降稳定性和沉降性,以及水平位移量更小,使周围软弱边界的变形处于较为稳定的状态。

关 键 词:堆载预压;真空堆载联合预压;分层沉降;地表沉降;深层土体水平位移
收稿时间:2016-10-14

The comparative study of surcharge preloading and vacuum surcharge preloading
Zhang Shimin and He Yulin. The comparative study of surcharge preloading and vacuum surcharge preloading[J]. Journal of Chongqing Jianzhu University, 2016, 38(Z2): 74-78
Authors:Zhang Shimin and He Yulin
Affiliation:Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou 310011, P. R. China and Zhejiang University City College, Hangzhou 310011, P. R. China
Abstract:Surcharge preloading and vacuum surcharge preloading are common methods to deal with soft soil foundation in engineering. Through the comparative study of surcharge preloading and vacuum surcharge preloading(the foundation treatment project of Zhoushan Futong cable), it can be seen that the efficiency of vacuum surcharge preloading has higher stability and better settlement, horizontal displacement and smaller deformation of the surrounding.It can make weak boundary has a stable state.
Keywords:surcharge preloading   vacuum surcharge preloading   layer settling   surface subsidence   horizontal displacement of deep soil
点击此处可从《重庆建筑大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《重庆建筑大学学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号