首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

不同贮藏条件下花生中黄曲霉毒素变化趋势
引用本文:刘冬梅,曹 成,俎建英,张 迪,尹海燕,李淑芳,贾 斌,王 敏,马 莹,刘继红.不同贮藏条件下花生中黄曲霉毒素变化趋势[J].食品安全质量检测技术,2016,7(5):1920-1923.
作者姓名:刘冬梅  曹 成  俎建英  张 迪  尹海燕  李淑芳  贾 斌  王 敏  马 莹  刘继红
作者单位:河南省农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所, 河南省粮食质量安全与检测重点实验室, 农业部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室,河南省农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所, 河南省粮食质量安全与检测重点实验室, 农业部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室,河南省农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所, 河南省粮食质量安全与检测重点实验室, 农业部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室,河南省农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所, 河南省粮食质量安全与检测重点实验室, 农业部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室,河南省农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所, 河南省粮食质量安全与检测重点实验室, 农业部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室,河南省农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所, 河南省粮食质量安全与检测重点实验室, 农业部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室,河南省农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所, 河南省粮食质量安全与检测重点实验室, 农业部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室,河南省农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所, 河南省粮食质量安全与检测重点实验室, 农业部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室,河南省农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所, 河南省粮食质量安全与检测重点实验室, 农业部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室,河南省农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所, 河南省粮食质量安全与检测重点实验室, 农业部农产品质量安全风险评估实验室
基金项目:河南省财政预算项目(花生中黄曲霉毒素控制技术研究)、国家农产品质量安全风险评估项目(GJFP2016007)
摘    要:目的探寻不同贮藏条件下花生中黄曲霉毒素含量的变化趋势。方法以远杂9102和豫花15品种的花生和花生仁为研究对象,采用免疫亲和层析净化高效液相色谱法测定其在不同储藏的条件下黄曲霉毒素的含量。结果在整个贮藏过程中,远杂9102和豫花15品种的花生和含水量低于10%的花生仁的黄曲霉毒素含量为0,而含水量高于10%的花生仁的黄曲霉毒素含量随着贮藏时间的延长而升高。在接菌量相同的条件下,同一品种的花生仁黄曲霉毒素的含量随含水量增加而增高;在含水量相同的条件下,同一品种花生仁中黄曲霉毒素的含量随接菌量的增加而增高。在相同的贮藏条件下,远杂9102花生仁中黄曲霉毒素含量极显著高于豫花15。结论在贮藏过程中,花生中黄曲霉毒素的含量与花生是否带壳、含水量、初始带菌量和品种之间具有相关性。

关 键 词:豫花15    远杂9102    黄曲霉毒素    含水量    贮藏条件
收稿时间:2016/4/21 0:00:00
修稿时间:2016/5/18 0:00:00

Variation trend of aflatoxins content in peanut under different storage conditions
LIU Dong-Mei,CAO Cheng,ZU Jian-Ying,ZHANG Di,YIN Hai-Yan,LI Shu-fang,JIA Bin,WANG Min,MA Ying and LIU Ji-Hong.Variation trend of aflatoxins content in peanut under different storage conditions[J].Food Safety and Quality Detection Technology,2016,7(5):1920-1923.
Authors:LIU Dong-Mei  CAO Cheng  ZU Jian-Ying  ZHANG Di  YIN Hai-Yan  LI Shu-fang  JIA Bin  WANG Min  MA Ying and LIU Ji-Hong
Affiliation:Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Henan Academy of Agricultural Science, Henan Key Laboratory of Grain Quality and Safety and Testing, Laboratory of Quality & Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-Products (Zhengzhou), Ministry of Agriculture,Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Henan Academy of Agricultural Science, Henan Key Laboratory of Grain Quality and Safety and Testing, Laboratory of Quality & Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-Products (Zhengzhou), Ministry of Agriculture,Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Henan Academy of Agricultural Science, Henan Key Laboratory of Grain Quality and Safety and Testing, Laboratory of Quality & Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-Products (Zhengzhou), Ministry of Agriculture,Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Henan Academy of Agricultural Science, Henan Key Laboratory of Grain Quality and Safety and Testing, Laboratory of Quality & Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-Products (Zhengzhou), Ministry of Agriculture,Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Henan Academy of Agricultural Science, Henan Key Laboratory of Grain Quality and Safety and Testing, Laboratory of Quality & Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-Products (Zhengzhou), Ministry of Agriculture,Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Henan Academy of Agricultural Science, Henan Key Laboratory of Grain Quality and Safety and Testing, Laboratory of Quality & Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-Products (Zhengzhou), Ministry of Agriculture,Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Henan Academy of Agricultural Science, Henan Key Laboratory of Grain Quality and Safety and Testing, Laboratory of Quality & Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-Products (Zhengzhou), Ministry of Agriculture,Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Henan Academy of Agricultural Science, Henan Key Laboratory of Grain Quality and Safety and Testing, Laboratory of Quality & Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-Products (Zhengzhou), Ministry of Agriculture,Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Henan Academy of Agricultural Science, Henan Key Laboratory of Grain Quality and Safety and Testing, Laboratory of Quality & Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-Products (Zhengzhou), Ministry of Agriculture and Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, Henan Academy of Agricultural Science, Henan Key Laboratory of Grain Quality and Safety and Testing, Laboratory of Quality & Safety Risk Assessment for Agro-Products (Zhengzhou), Ministry of Agriculture
Abstract:Objective To explore the variation trend of aflatoxins content in peanut under different storage conditions. Methods Using peanut and peanut kernel of YUANZA9102 (YZ9102) and YUHUA15 (YH15) as study objects, the contents of aflatoxins under different storage conditions were detected by immune affinity chromatography purification with high performance liquid chromatography. Results During the whole storage, the contents of aflatoxins in 2 varieties of peanuts and the peanut kernel of YZ9102 and YH15 with water content less than 10% were 0, while the content of aflatoxins in peanut kernel with water content more than 10% increased with the prolonging of storage time. The content of aflatoxins in the same variety of peanut kernel increased with the increase of water content under the same condition of inoculation quantity; and the content of aflatoxins in the same variety of peanut kernel increased with the increase of inoculation quantity under the same condition of water content. The content of aflatoxins in peanut kernel of YZ9102 was significantly higher than that of YH15. Conclusion During the whole storage, the content of aflatoxins was correlated with peanut shell, water content, the initial quantity of pathogen and the variety.
Keywords:YUHUA15  YUANZA9102  aflatoxins  water content  storage conditions
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《食品安全质量检测技术》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《食品安全质量检测技术》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号