| 胺碘酮与西地兰治疗快速型房颤的对照研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王钟杰,黄雪莲.胺碘酮与西地兰治疗快速型房颤的对照研究[J].海南医学,2008,19(7):11-12. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王钟杰 黄雪莲 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 广东省潮州市潮州医院,广东,潮州,521011 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的对照研究胺碘酮与西地兰治疗快速型房颤的效果。方法对80例快速型房颤患者随机分成两组,每组40例,分别静脉应用胺碘酮与西地兰。结果胺碘酮组在用药后12小时及24小时有效率均高于西地兰组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论胺碘酮针治疗快速型房颤安全且效果良好。
|
| 关 键 词： | 胺碘酮 西地兰 心房颤动 |
| 文章编号： | 1003-6350(2008)07-0011-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2008年2月2日 |
Clinical research between amiodarone therapy and cedilanid therapy in the patients with rapid atrial fibrillation |
| |
| WANG Zhong-jie,HUANG Xue-lian.Clinical research between amiodarone therapy and cedilanid therapy in the patients with rapid atrial fibrillation[J].Hainan Medical Journal,2008,19(7):11-12. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Zhong-jie HUANG Xue-lian |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To evaluate the clinical effect of using amiodarone and cedilanid therapy in the patiens with rapid atrial fibrillation. Methods 80 patients with rapid atrial fibrillation were randomly divided into two groups, every group was 40 patients. Amiodarone was used in the group and cedlanid was used in the other group. Results After 12 hours and 24 hours, the group of using Amidarone were superior to the group of using cedilanid. The two groups had significant difference (P<0.05). Conclusion It is safe, effective to use amidarone therapy in patients with rapid atrial fibrillation. |
| |
| Keywords: | Amiodarone Cedilanid Atrial fibrillation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
