Phagocytic activity in stressed mice: effects of alprazolam

To evaluate the possible role of ethnicity in susceptibility to filarial infection, a comparative study of the prevalence of filarial infection was initiated in an endemic village inhabited by two ethnic populations of mainlanders and tribals. An age and sex matched sampled population of 591 mainlanders and 106 tribals was studied by detailed clinical and parasitological (60 mm3 blood) examinations. Sera collected from both population groups (26 each) matched for clinical stage of infection were analysed for humoral immune responses such as antifilarial IgG, circulating filarial antigen and immune complex level. The overall prevalences of clinical disease and infection in both mainlanders (34.18 and 14.4%) and tribals (25.47 and 17.9%) were comparable. However, both annual average adenolymphangitic attack rate (1.77 year-1) and the prevalence of chronic filarial disease (22.6%) amongst tribals were significantly lower. No true elephantiasis was observed in tribals. No significant difference was observed in their humoral immune response, although the antifilarial antibody of IgG class in all stages of filarial infection was lower in tribals than in mainlanders. The results did not reveal any difference in susceptibility to filarial infection in the ethnic groups. The paucity of progressive lesions observed in tribals possibly reflects a difference in the anatomy of lymphatics or genetic or immunoregulatory mechanisms, that needs further study.