乳腺癌肝转移的不同治疗方法比较

目的 比较手术治疗、全身化疗、全身化疗联合肝动脉化疗栓塞对乳腺癌肝转移的疗效.方法 回顾性分析1996年1月至2008年10月52例乳腺癌肝转移临床资料,根据治疗方法分为手术组(12例)和单纯全身化疗组(22例)和全身化疗联合肝动脉化疗栓塞组(18例),分析3组的疗效及预后,比较不同治疗方法的疗效.结果 52例乳腺癌术后肝转移患者,全组治疗有效27例(51.9%),手术组有效4例(33.3%),单纯全身化疗组有效11例(50.0%),全身化疗联合肝动脉化疗栓塞组有效12例(66.6%).1、2、3年生存率手术治疗组分别为25.0%(3例)、8.3%(11例)、0,单纯全身化疗组分别为31.8%(7例)、13.6%(3例)、9.1%(2例),全身化疗联合肝动脉化疗栓塞组分别为44.4%(8例)、33.3%(6例)、11.1%(2例),全身化疗联合肝动脉化疗栓塞组生存率明显优于手术治疗组和单纯全身化疗组(P<0.05).结论 采用全身化疗联合肝动脉化疗栓塞治疗乳腺癌术后肝转移疗效较好,值得临床进一步推广.

Abstract：

Objective To explore the efficacy of hepatectomy and chemotherapy and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus chemotherapy on breast cancer complicated with liver metastases. Methods Clinical features of 52 breast cancer patients with liver metastases from 1996 to 2008 were analyzed retrospectively. Fifty-two patients were divided into surgery group (group Ⅰ) , systemic chemotherapy group (group Ⅱ) and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus chemotherapy group (group Ⅲ). The efficacies of different treatment approaches were compared. Results The total responsive rate was 51.9% for among all patients. TACE plus chemotherapy produced a significantly higher partial response rate 66. 6% in comparison with 50. 0% (11 cases) of systemic chemotherapy and 33.3% ( 4 cases ) of hepatectomy ( P < 0. 05 ). The median survival time was 16 months ( 2-50 months)and 1-year, 2-year, 3-year survival rate in three groups was 25.0% , 8. 3% , 0( group I ) , 31. 8% , 13.6%, 8.9%(group Ⅱ)and 44.4%, 33.3%, ll.l%(group Ⅲ), respectively. The survival time of group Ⅲ was the longest (P <0.05). Conclusion Chemotherapy plus TACE may be an effective and safe treatment for liver metastases after breast cancer.

The treatment of liver metastases alter breast cancer

Objective To explore the efficacy of hepatectomy and chemotherapy and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus chemotherapy on breast cancer complicated with liver metastases. Methods Clinical features of 52 breast cancer patients with liver metastases from 1996 to 2008 were analyzed retrospectively. Fifty-two patients were divided into surgery group (group Ⅰ) , systemic chemotherapy group (group Ⅱ) and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus chemotherapy group (group Ⅲ). The efficacies of different treatment approaches were compared. Results The total responsive rate was 51.9% for among all patients. TACE plus chemotherapy produced a significantly higher partial response rate 66. 6% in comparison with 50. 0% (11 cases) of systemic chemotherapy and 33.3% ( 4 cases ) of hepatectomy ( P < 0. 05 ). The median survival time was 16 months ( 2-50 months)and 1-year, 2-year, 3-year survival rate in three groups was 25.0% , 8. 3% , 0( group I ) , 31. 8% , 13.6%, 8.9%(group Ⅱ)and 44.4%, 33.3%, ll.l%(group Ⅲ), respectively. The survival time of group Ⅲ was the longest (P <0.05). Conclusion Chemotherapy plus TACE may be an effective and safe treatment for liver metastases after breast cancer.