| 三种压水堆核电厂的放射性环境影响比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李红,张凌燕,方栋.三种压水堆核电厂的放射性环境影响比较[J].辐射防护,2009(4). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李红 张凌燕 方栋 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 清华大学核能与新能源技术研究院;中广核工程设计有限公司; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文简要介绍和比较了AP1000、EPR、CPR1000三种压水堆核电厂的放射性三废处理系统,并将放射性源项和GB6249-1986的排放量控制值进行了比较。然后,在一个假设的内陆厂址条件下评价和比较了三种机型两台机组核电厂的放射性环境影响。研究表明,三种机型的环境影响都是可以接受的。
|
| 关 键 词： | AP1000 EPR CPR1000 核电厂 环境影响 比较 |
COMPARISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL IMPACTS FOR THREE TYPES OF PWR NUCLEAR POWER PLANT |
| |
| Li Hong Zhang Lingyan Fang Dong.COMPARISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL IMPACTS FOR THREE TYPES OF PWR NUCLEAR POWER PLANT[J].Radiation Protection,2009(4). |
| |
| Authors: | Li Hong Zhang Lingyan Fang Dong |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology;Tsinghua University;Beijing;100084;2. China Nuclear Power Engineering Company LTD;Guangdong Shenzhen;518049;3. China Nuclear Power Engineering Company LTD;Shanghai;200030 |
| |
| Abstract: | The liquid,gas and solid radioactive waste treatment systems of AP1000,EPR and CPR1000 are introduced and compared briefly in the paper. Their source terms are compared with the discharge limits of GB 6249-1986. The environmental radiological impacts of these three types of PWR NPPs are assessed and compared based on an inland site condition. The results show the environmental impacts of these three types of PWR NPPs are acceptable. |
| |
| Keywords: | AP1000 EPR CPR1000 Environmental Impacts Comparing |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
