首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

锁定加压钢板内固定治疗四肢长骨粉碎性骨折临床分析
引用本文:杜兵强. 锁定加压钢板内固定治疗四肢长骨粉碎性骨折临床分析[J]. 中医临床研究, 2014, 0(8): 146-147
作者姓名:杜兵强
作者单位:郑州市第六人民医院;
摘    要:目的:探究锁定加压钢板内固定治疗四肢长骨粉碎性骨折的临床效果。方法:对近年来在我院接受治疗的72例四肢长骨粉碎性骨折患者的临床资料进行回顾分析,按照治疗方式的区别分为观察组36例与对照组36例,对照组给予石膏外固定及手法复位治疗,观察组则给予锁定加压钢板(LCP)内固定治疗,对比两组患者的临床疗效。结果:所有患者均实现解剖复位,骨折愈合时间4~11个月,均未发生严重并发症。观察组患者关节功能的恢复优良率为94.4%,明显高于对照组的72.2%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:与传统石膏外固定治疗四肢长骨粉碎性骨折相比,LCP内固定疗法具有固定可靠、创伤小、功能恢复好等优点,值得推广。

关 键 词:锁定加压钢板  内固定  四肢长骨粉碎性骨折

A clinical analysis of treating limb long bone fractures by locking compression plate therapy
Abstract:Objective: To explore the clinical effect of locking compression plate fixation for long bone fractures. Methods: 72 cases of long bone fractures were retrospectively analyzed, according to the difference, 36 patients were divided into observation and control group of 36 patients; control group was treated with external fixation and plaster manual reduction, the observation group was treated with locking compression plate (LCP) i]xation. Results: All patients achieved anatomic reduction, fracture healing time 4~ 11 months, no serious complications. Observation group to restore joint fimction in patients with an excellent rate was 94.4%, significantly higher than 72.2%, the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion: Compared with traditional plaster external fixation of long bone fractures compared to, LCP has a fixed and reliable fixation therapy, trauma, functional recovery and good, worthy ofloromotion.
Keywords:Locking compression plate  Internal fixation  Limb long bone fractures
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号