首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

冬小麦叶面积指数遥感反演方法比较研究
引用本文:谢巧云,黄文江,蔡淑红,梁栋,彭代亮,张清,黄林生,杨贵军,张东彦.冬小麦叶面积指数遥感反演方法比较研究[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2014,34(5):1352-1356.
作者姓名:谢巧云  黄文江  蔡淑红  梁栋  彭代亮  张清  黄林生  杨贵军  张东彦
作者单位:1. 中国科学院遥感与数字地球研究所,数字地球重点实验室,北京 100094
2. 安徽大学, 计算机智能与信号处理教育部重点实验室,安徽 合肥 230039
3. 河北省农业技术推广总站,河北 石家庄 050011
4. 北京农业信息技术研究中心,北京 100097
基金项目:中国科学院百人计划项目(黄文江), 国家自然科学基金项目(41271412)项目和安徽省高等学校省级自然科学研究项目(KJ2013A026)资助
摘    要:叶面积指数(leaf area index, LAI)是反映作物生长状况和进行产量预测预报的主要指标之一,对诊断作物生长状况具有重要意义。遥感技术为大面积、快速监测植被LAI提供了有效途径。利用高光谱遥感影像,结合田间同步实验数据,探讨不同方法对冬小麦叶面积指数遥感反演的能力。介绍了支持向量机、离散小波变换、连续小波变换和主成分分析四种LAI反演方法。分别利用上述四种方法构建冬小麦LAI反演模型,并对不同算法反演的LAI模型进行了真实性检验。结果显示,支持向量机非线性回归模型精度最高,对冬小麦LAI估算能力最强,反演值与实测值拟合的决定系数为0.823 4、均方根误差为0.419 5。离散小波变换法和主成分分析法都是基于特征提取和数据降维,其多元变量回归分析对LAI估算能力相近,决定系数分别为0.697 1和0.692 4,均方根误差分别为0.605 8和0.554 1。连续小波变换法回归模型精度最低,不适宜直接用其小波系数来反演LAI。结果表明,非线性支持向量机模型最适宜用于研究区域的冬小麦LAI反演。

关 键 词:叶面积指数  高光谱  支持向量机  小波变换  主成分分析    
收稿时间:2013/7/10

Comparative Study on Remote Sensing Invertion Methods for Estimating Winter Wheat Leaf Area Index
XIE Qiao-yun;HUANG Wen-jiang;CAI Shu-hong;LIANG Dong;PENG Dai-liang;ZHANG Qing;HUANG Lin-sheng;YANG Gui-jun;ZHANG Dong-yan.Comparative Study on Remote Sensing Invertion Methods for Estimating Winter Wheat Leaf Area Index[J].Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis,2014,34(5):1352-1356.
Authors:XIE Qiao-yun;HUANG Wen-jiang;CAI Shu-hong;LIANG Dong;PENG Dai-liang;ZHANG Qing;HUANG Lin-sheng;YANG Gui-jun;ZHANG Dong-yan
Affiliation:1. Key Laboratory of Digital Earth Science, Institute of Remote Sensing and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China2. Key Laboratory of Intelligent Computer & Signal Processing, Ministry of Education, Anhui University, Hefei 230039, China3. Hebei Agricultural Technique Extension Station, Shijiazhuang 050011, China4. Beijing Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China
Abstract:The present study aims to explore capability of different methods for winter wheat leaf area index inversion by integrating remote sensing image and synchronization field experiment. There were four kinds of LAI inversion methods discussed, specifically, support vector machines (SVM), discrete wavelet transform (DWT), continuous wavelet transform (CWT) and principal component analysis (PCA). Winter wheat LAI inversion models were established with the above four methods respectively, then estimation precision for each model was analyzed. Both discrete wavelet transform method and principal component analysis method are based on feature extraction and data dimension reduction, and multivariate regression models of the two methods showed comparable accuracy (R2 of DWT and PCA model was 0.697 1 and 0.692 4 respectively; RMSE was 0.605 8 and 0.554 1 respectively). While the model based on continuous wavelet transform suffered the lowest accuracy and didn’t seem to be qualified to inverse LAI. It was indicated that the nonlinear regression model with support vector machines method is the most eligible model for estimating winter wheat LAI in the study area.
Keywords:Leaf area index  Hyperspectral  Support vector machine  Wavelet transform  Principle component analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《光谱学与光谱分析》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《光谱学与光谱分析》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号