首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

两种高光谱热红外数据大气校正方法的分析与比较
引用本文:周孝明,王宁,吴骅. 两种高光谱热红外数据大气校正方法的分析与比较[J]. 遥感学报, 2012, 16(4): 796-808
作者姓名:周孝明  王宁  吴骅
作者单位:中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 资源与环境信息系统国家重点实验室, 北京 100101;中国科学院 研究生院, 北京 100049;中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 资源与环境信息系统国家重点实验室, 北京 100101;中国科学院 光电研究院, 北京 100080;中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所 资源与环境信息系统国家重点实验室, 北京 100101
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(编号: 41071231);国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)(编号: 2009AA122102)
摘    要:利用模拟数据对Autonomous Atmospheric Compensation(AAC)和In-scene Atmospheric Compensation(ISAC)这两种高光谱热红外数据大气校正方法进行了对比和分析。结果显示,在满足方法适用条件情况下,AAC方法大气校正精度较高,除湿热的热带大气外,大气透过率的反演误差小于0.02,大气上行辐射的误差小于0.004W.m-2.sr-1.cm;而ISAC方法精度较低,透过率误差在0.05至0.3之间,上行辐射误差在0.003W.m-2.sr-1.cm至0.035W.m-2.sr-1.cm之间变化,误差随大气水汽含量增加而增加。大气非均一性对大气校正精度影响分析表明,AAC方法大气校正精度受大气非均一性影响显著。因此,需从高光谱数据光谱信息出发,发展针对低空间分辨率高光谱热红外数据的大气校正方法,以克服现有方法大气水平均一假设的不足。

关 键 词:高光谱热红外  地表温度  地表比辐射率  大气校正
收稿时间:2011-07-28
修稿时间:2011-10-24

Comparison of two methods for atmospheric correction of hyper-spectral thermal infrared data
ZHOU Xiaoming,WANG Ning and WU Hua. Comparison of two methods for atmospheric correction of hyper-spectral thermal infrared data[J]. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2012, 16(4): 796-808
Authors:ZHOU Xiaoming  WANG Ning  WU Hua
Affiliation:Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;Academy of Opto-electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, China;Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
Abstract:Atmospheric correction is inevitable in estimating land surface temperature and land surface emissivity using hyperspectral thermal infrared data. The Autonomous Atmospheric Compensation (AAC) and In-scene Atmospheric Compensation (ISAC) are the two main methods for atmospheric correction of hyper-spectral thermal data. Those two methods were applied to the simulated datasets. Results show that the high accuracy of the AAC method, except for the tropic atmosphere, and the root mean stand error (RMSE) of the transmittance and the up-welling radiance for the AAC method is less than 0.002 and 0.004 W·m-2·sr-1·cm, respectively. On the contrary, the error of the ISAC method is large, and the error of the transmittance varies from 0.05 to 0.3 and the error of the up-welling radiance changes from 0.003 W·m-2·sr-1·cm to 0.035 W·m-2·sr-1·cm. The error increases as the increase of total precipitable water of the atmosphere. Analysis on the impact of heterogeneity of atmosphere on accuracy of atmospheric correction shows that the accuracy of AAC approach is infl uenced signifi cantly by the heterogeneity of atmosphere. It is necessary to develop atmospheric correction methods for hyper-spectral thermal infrared data of low spatial resolution to overcome the drawback of requiring homogeneous atmosphere by existing atmospheric correction approaches. Key words: hyper-spectral thermal infrared, land surface temperature, land surface emissivity, atmospheric correction
Keywords:hyper-spectral thermal infrared  land surface temperature  land surface emissivity  atmospheric correction
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《遥感学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《遥感学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号