首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

2019年重庆市水果类监督抽检情况分析
引用本文:谭明天,查 茜,黄思瑜,许晶冰,黄先亮,杨小珊.2019年重庆市水果类监督抽检情况分析[J].食品安全质量检测技术,2021,12(9):3849-3853.
作者姓名:谭明天  查 茜  黄思瑜  许晶冰  黄先亮  杨小珊
作者单位:重庆市食品药品检验检测研究院,重庆市农业科学院,重庆市食品药品检验检测研究院,重庆市食品药品检验检测研究院,重庆市食品药品检验检测研究院,重庆市食品药品检验检测研究院
基金项目:“国家重点研发计划”食品安全社会共治信息技术研究与应用示范项目(编号:2017YFC1602000);重庆市科研机构绩效激励引导专项项目(cstc2020jxjl0168)
摘    要:目的 研究2019年重庆市水果类监督抽检结果, 分析新鲜水果类食品存在的主要食品安全风险。 方法 整理汇总了重庆市市场监督管理局2019年发布的44个食品安全抽检信息通告, 提取食用农产品中新鲜水果类的数据, 对不合格样品进行分析。结果 2019年重庆市共抽检了3785批次水果类食用农产品, 包括了29个水果品种。不合格数37批次, 不合格率为0.98%, 包含柑、橘,香蕉,苹果。柑、橘不合格率为2.08%, 不合格项目是丙溴磷; 香蕉不合格率为15.98%, 不合格项目是吡唑醚菌酯; 苹果不合格率为0.11%, 不合格项目是敌敌畏。其余水果品种未发现不合格样品。结论 2019年重庆市水果类食品安全总体形势良好, 但应警惕柑、橘水果中的丙溴磷和香蕉中的吡唑醚菌酯的违规使用。

关 键 词:水果    监督抽检    农药残留    吡唑醚菌酯
收稿时间:2021/1/7 0:00:00
修稿时间:2021/5/12 0:00:00

Analysis for fruits supervision and sampling of Chongqing in 2019
TAN Ming-Tian,ZHA Xi,HUANG Si-Yu,XU Jing-Bing,HUANG Xian-Liang,YANG Xiao-Shan.Analysis for fruits supervision and sampling of Chongqing in 2019[J].Food Safety and Quality Detection Technology,2021,12(9):3849-3853.
Authors:TAN Ming-Tian  ZHA Xi  HUANG Si-Yu  XU Jing-Bing  HUANG Xian-Liang  YANG Xiao-Shan
Affiliation:Chongqing Institute for Food and Drug Control,Chongqing Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Chongqing Institute for Food and Drug Control,Chongqing Institute for Food and Drug Control,Chongqing Institute for Food and Drug Control,Chongqing Institute for Food and Drug Control
Abstract:Objective To study the results for fresh fruits supervision and sampling of Chongqing in 2019, and to analyze the main food safety hazards of fresh fruits. Methods The 44 notices of the food safety supervision and sampling inspection published by Market Supervision Administration of Chongqing in 2019 were summarized, the fruits data among edible agricultural products data were collected, and the failed batches were analyzed. Results Totally 3785 batches of fresh fruit samples in edible agricultural products, including 29 varieties of fruit, were announced by Chongqing in 2019. The number of unqualified batches was 37, and the unqualified rate was 0.98%, including orangemandarins , tangerines, banana and apple. The unqualified rate for mandarinsoranges and tangerines was 2.08%, and the unqualified item was profenofos. The unqualified rate for bananas was 15.98%, and the unqualified item was pyraclostrobin. The unqualified rate for apples was 0.11%, and the unqualified item was dichlorvos. No unqualified samples were found for other fruit varieties. Conclusion In 2019, the overall situation of fresh fruits food safety in Chongqing is good, but we should be wary of the illegal use of profenofos in mandarincitrus and tangerine fruits and pyraclostrobin in bananas.
Keywords:fresh fruit  supervision and sampling inspection  farm chemical residues exceed the standard  pyraclostrobin
点击此处可从《食品安全质量检测技术》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《食品安全质量检测技术》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号