粘合术与缝合术对皮肤裂伤的疗效对比观察

目的探讨皮肤裂伤伤口处理的理想方法。方法2009-07—2011-07将140例皮肤裂伤患者随机分为实验组（70例）和对照组（70例），实验组施行清创粘合术，对照组施行清创缝合术。术后第1、3、7天对伤口愈合情况及愈后外观满意程度进行对比观察。结果两组患者伤口愈合情况比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05），而实验组的愈合外观满意程度优于对照组（P〈0．01）。结论清创粘合术治疗皮肤裂伤的手术时间短，术后伤口愈合，尤其是患者满意度方面效果较好。合理应用清创粘合术是治疗皮肤裂伤，改善伤口愈合外观的良好方法。

Contrast of therapeutic effects between adhesive and suture in the treatment of skin lacerations

Objective To find an ideal method in the treatment of skin lacerations. Methods One hundred and forty patients with skin laceration were randomly divided into two groups, with 70 patients in each group. The control group was treated by traditional debridement and suture, and the experimental group was treated by adhesive and debfidement. The situation of wound healing and satisfactory degree of postoperative cosmetic appearance were followed up 1,2, and 7 days after the treatment. Results There was no statistically significant difference in the situ- ation of wound healing between two groups（P 〉 0. 05 ） ; but the satisfactory degree of postoperative cosmetic appear- ance in the experimental group was better than that in the control group（P 〈 0. 01 ）. Conclusion Compared with de- bridment and suture, debridement and adhesive is a better treatment for the wound of skin laceration, which saves the time and improves the patients＇ satisfactory degree.