首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

四川省大学新生性知识关注情况及影响因素
引用本文:余彬,裴容,韩佳禹,陈俊涛,徐晓宗,张晓玲,刘宣莉,杨淑娟,杨诗凡,董佩杰.四川省大学新生性知识关注情况及影响因素[J].中国学校卫生,2020,41(3):352-355.
作者姓名:余彬  裴容  韩佳禹  陈俊涛  徐晓宗  张晓玲  刘宣莉  杨淑娟  杨诗凡  董佩杰
作者单位:四川大学华西公共卫生学院/华西第四医院,成都,610041
基金项目:四川省卫生和计划生育委员会项目;四川文理学院教改项目(2017JZ18);四川性社会学与性教育研究中心资助项目(SXTYB1919)。
摘    要:了解四川省不同特征大学新生对性知识的关注情况,为高校开展规范性教育提供参考.方法 2018年9月采用立意抽样选取四川省13所高校,再随机抽取班级共2 532名入学新生进行调查,分析不同特征学生对不同性知识关注度的差异.结果 不同特征新生关注较多的性知识为伴侣沟通(39.25% ~ 55.10%)、性病艾滋病(37.78% ~44.85%)、性别平等(33.33%~43.34%).Logistic回归分析显示,男生更关注伴侣沟通(0R=0.77,95%CI=0.65~0.91)、自慰(OR=0.36,95%CI=0.27~0.47)、性少数群体(OR=0.61,95%CI=0.41~0.90),女生更关注性别平等(OR=1.31,95%CI=1.10~1.57)、性骚扰与暴力(OR=1.65,95%CI=1.37~1.98);农村学生更关注伴侣沟通(OR=0.79,95% CI=0.65 ~0.94),城镇学生更关注自慰(OR=1.50,95%CI=1.08~2.08)、性骚扰与性暴力(OR=1.30,95%CI-1.07~1.58);有性行为经历的学生比无性经历的学生更关注避孕与意外怀孕(0R=0.53,95%CI=0.39~0.72);性少数学生比异性恋学生更关注性少数群体(0R=3.50,95%CI=2.30~5.33).结论 不同特征学生对不同性知识的关注度有所不同,并且与需求有关.建议学校开设全面性教育课程,根据不同特征学生的需求,性教育知识内容可有所侧重,开展全面而有针对性的性教育.

关 键 词:    知识    健康教育    回归分析    学生

Concern and influencing factors of freshman knowledge in Sichuan university
YU Bin,PEI Rong,HAN Jiayu,CHEN Juntao,XU Xiaozong,ZHANG Xiaoling,LIU Xuanli,YANG Shujuan,YANG Shifan,DONG Peijie.Concern and influencing factors of freshman knowledge in Sichuan university[J].Chinese Journal of School Health,2020,41(3):352-355.
Authors:YU Bin  PEI Rong  HAN Jiayu  CHEN Juntao  XU Xiaozong  ZHANG Xiaoling  LIU Xuanli  YANG Shujuan  YANG Shifan  DONG Peijie
Affiliation:(West China School of Public Health/West China Fourth Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu(610041),China;不详)
Abstract:Objective To understand the concern of freshmen with different characteristics on sexual knowledge in Sichuan province and to provide evidence for comprenensive sex education in colleges. Methods A survey was conducted among 2 532 freshmen from 13 universities in Sichuan Province in September 2018. Attention to specific sexual knowledge among students with different characteristics was analyzed. Results Sexual knowledge that the freshmen concerned included partner communication( 39.25% ~55.10%),STD and AIDS( 37.78% ~ 44.85%) and gender equality( 33.33% ~ 43.34%). Logistic regression results showed that male students payed more attention to partner communication( OR = 0.77,95% CI = 0.65-0.91),masturbation( OR =0.36,95%CI = 0.27-0.47) and sexual minorities( OR = 0.61,95%CI = 0.41-0.90),while female students payed more attention to gender equality( OR = 1. 31,95% CI = 1. 10-1. 57),sexual harassment and violence( OR = 1. 65,95% CI = 1. 37-1. 98). Rural students pay. more attention to partner communication( OR = 0.79,95%CI = 0.65-0.94),while urban students pay. more attention to masturbation( OR = 1. 50,95% CI = 1. 08-2. 08),sexual harassment and sexual violence( OR = 1. 30,95% CI = 1. 07-1. 58).Students who had sex were more concerned about contraception and unwanted pregnancy than those who had not( OR = 0.53,95%CI= 0.39-0.72). Sexual minority students were more concerned about topic of sexual minorities than heterosexual students( OR = 3.50,95%CI = 2.30-5.33). Conclusion College freshmen with different characteristics varied in their concern on sexual knowledge,which is related to their needs. It is suggested that schools set up comprehensive education courses according to the needs of students,the content of sex education knowledge can be focused,and carry out comprehensive and targeted sex education.
Keywords:Sex  Knowledge  Health education  Regression analysis  Students
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国学校卫生》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国学校卫生》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号