首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     


HPV Vaccination Recommendation Practices among Adolescent Health Care Providers in 5 Countries
Authors:Hillary M Topazian  Debanjali Kundu  Kathryn Peebles  Silvina Ramos  Karen Morgan  Chan Joo Kim  Karin L Richter  Noel T Brewer  Mercè Peris  Jennifer S Smith
Affiliation:1. Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;2. Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;3. Centro de Estudios de Estado y Sociedad, Buenos Aires, Argentina;4. Perdana University, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland School of Medicine, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia;5. Department of Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland;6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, St. Paul''s Hospital, Seoul, Korea;7. Department of Medical Virology, University of Pretoria, National Health Laboratory Service, Pretoria, South Africa;8. Cancer Epidemiology Research Programme, Institut Català d’Oncologia, Barcelona, Spain;9. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Abstract:

Study Objective

To assess adolescent health care providers’ recommendations for, and attitudes towards human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in 5 countries.

Design

In-depth interviews of adolescent health care providers, 2013-2014.

Setting

Five countries where HPV vaccination is at various stages of implementation into national programs: Argentina, Malaysia, South Africa, South Korea, and Spain.

Participants

Adolescent health care providers (N = 151) who had administered or overseen provision of adolescent vaccinations (N = Argentina: 30, Malaysia: 30, South Africa: 31, South Korea: 30, Spain: 30).

Main Outcome Measures

Frequency of HPV vaccination recommendation, reasons providers do not always recommend the vaccine and facilitators to doing so, comfort level with recommending the vaccine, reasons for any discomfort, and positive and negative aspects of HPV vaccination.

Results

Over half of providers 82/151 (54%) recommend HPV vaccination always or most of the time (range: 20% in Malaysia to 90% in Argentina). Most providers 112/151 (74%) said they were comfortable recommending HPV vaccination, although South Korea was an outlier 10/30 (33%). Providers cited protection against cervical cancer 124/151 (83%) and genital warts 56/151 (37%) as benefits of HPV vaccination. When asked about the problems with HPV vaccination, providers mentioned high cost 75/151 (50% overall; range: 26% in South Africa to 77% in South Korea) and vaccination safety 28/151 (19%; range: 7% in South Africa to 33% in Spain). Free, low-cost, or publicly available vaccination 59/151 (39%), and additional data on vaccination safety 52/151 (34%) and efficacy 43/151 (28%) were the most commonly cited facilitators of health provider vaccination recommendation.

Conclusion

Interventions to increase HPV vaccination should consider a country's specific provider concerns, such as reducing cost and providing information on vaccination safety and efficacy.
Keywords:Human papilloma virus  HPV-associated cancers  Cervical cancer  Vaccination  Health care provider recommendation
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号