首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

配备呼气末正压通气阀简易呼吸器在严重低氧血症患者院内转运中的应用
引用本文:张晖,史婧,徐军,刘业成,袁莹,徐腾达,朱华栋,王仲,于学忠. 配备呼气末正压通气阀简易呼吸器在严重低氧血症患者院内转运中的应用[J]. 临床误诊误治, 2012, 25(11): 43-45
作者姓名:张晖  史婧  徐军  刘业成  袁莹  徐腾达  朱华栋  王仲  于学忠
作者单位:1. 中国医学科学院中国协和医学院北京协和医院急诊科,北京,100730
2. 清华大学第一附属医院北京华信医院急诊科,北京,100016
基金项目:北京协和医学院创新团队基金支持项目
摘    要:目的观察严重低氧血症患者应用配备呼气末正压通气(PEEP)阀简易呼吸器进行院内转运的有效性与安全性。方法选择2011年7月—2012年3月我院急诊抢救室与急诊ICU收治的严重低氧血症且需院内转运的69例进行前瞻性研究,随机将其分为配备PEEP阀简易呼吸器转运组(PEEP呼吸器组)和传统呼吸器转运组(传统呼吸器组),观察并比较两组切换呼吸支持方式2 min后及转运过程中血氧饱和度(SaO2)变化,同时记录两组转运准备时间。结果切换呼吸支持方式2 min后及转运过程中SaO2水平,PEEP呼吸器组分别为0.980±0.014和0.973±0.012,传统呼吸器组分别为0.953±0.022和0.951±0.024,相应时间点比较PEEP呼吸器组均高于传统呼吸器组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。切换呼吸支持方式2 min后及转运过程中SaO2水平,PEEP呼吸器组均高于转运前,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);传统呼吸器组均低于转运前但差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。转运准备时间PEEP呼吸器组为(2.1±0.5)min,传统呼吸器组为(5.5±1.3)min,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论严重低氧血症患者应用配备PEEP阀简易呼吸器进行院内转运安全、有效,且较应用传统简易呼吸器转运更为便捷。

关 键 词:低氧血症  正压呼吸  通气机,机械

Application of Portable Breather Valve Respirator with PEEP Valve on Oxygenation in Patients with Severe Hypoxemia during Inhospital Transport
ZHAN Hui , SHI Jing , XU Jun , LIU Ye-chen , YUAN Ying , XU Teng-da , ZHU Hua-dong , WANG Zhong , YU Xue-zhong. Application of Portable Breather Valve Respirator with PEEP Valve on Oxygenation in Patients with Severe Hypoxemia during Inhospital Transport[J]. Clinical Misdiagnosis & Mistherapy, 2012, 25(11): 43-45
Authors:ZHAN Hui    SHI Jing    XU Jun    LIU Ye-chen    YUAN Ying    XU Teng-da    ZHU Hua-dong    WANG Zhong    YU Xue-zhong
Affiliation:, XU Jun , LIU Ye-chen , YUAN Ying , XU Teng-da , ZHU Hua-dong , WANG Zhong , YU Xue-zhong (1. Department of Emergency, Beijing Union Hospital Affiliated to Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China; 2. Department of Emergency, Huaxin Hospital, First Hospital of Tsinghua University, Beijing 100016, China)
Abstract:Objective To investigate effect and safety of portable breather valve respirator with PEEP valve on oxygenation in patients with severe hypoxemia during inhospital transport. Methods 69 patients with severe hypoxemia who needed inhospital transpert during July 2011 and March 2012 in the resuscitation room and emergency intensive care unit (EICU) in our hospital were prospec- tively investigated and randomly divided into 2 groups: portable breather valve respirator with PEEP valve group (group A) and traditional transpert ventilator group ( group B). Saturation of blood oxygen ( SaO2 ) in the two groups 2 min after breathing support ways were switched and during transport process were observed and compared. Set up time of transport of the two groups were also recorded at the same time. Results The levels of SaO2 in group A 2 min after breathing support ways were switched and during transport process were 0.980±0.014 and 0.973 ±0.012, while in group B they were 0.953 ± 0.022 and 0.951 ± 0.024. The levels of SaO2 in group A were significantly higher than those in group B at corresponding time (P 〈 0.05). The levels of SaO2 in group A 2 min after breathing support ways were switched and during transport process were significantly higher than those before transport (P 〈0.05); while in group B the differences were of no statistical significance (P 〉0.05). The preparing time in group A was 2. 1 ± 0.5 min while it was 5.5 ± 1.3 min in group B (P 〈 0. 05). Conclusion Bag valve ventilation with PEEP valve can be used effectively and safely as transport ventilator for patients with severe hypoxemia. It is more convenient than the traditional transport ventilator.
Keywords:Anoxemia  Positive pressure respiration  Ventilators, machine
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号