首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

GnRH-a联合GnRH-ant超短方案对卵巢低反应患者疗效的Meta分析
引用本文:刘西茹,班艳娜,傅惠佳. GnRH-a联合GnRH-ant超短方案对卵巢低反应患者疗效的Meta分析[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2018, 0(4): 350-355. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201710039
作者姓名:刘西茹  班艳娜  傅惠佳
作者单位:重庆医科大学附属第一医院生殖健康与不孕症专科,重庆,400016
摘    要:目的 系统评价促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRH-agonist,GnRH-a)联合促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂(GnRH-antagonist,GnRH-ant)超短方案对卵巢低反应患者治疗的有效性.方法 检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL、中国生物医学数据库和万方数据库,检索时间截至2017年7月.纳入关于GnRH-a联合GnRH-ant超短方案治疗卵巢低反应患者的随机对照试验或临床对照试验,由2位评价员根据纳入与排除标准独立进行文献筛选、资料提取和质量评价后,采用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析.结果 共纳入6篇文献,336个周期;GnRH-a联合GnRH-ant超短方案与对照组比较,Gn用药总量(WMD=6.32,P=0.09,95% CI:-0.92 ~ 13.55)、Gn用药时间(WMD=0.38,P=0.07,95%CI:-0.04 ~0.81)、胚胎移植数(WMD=0.24,P=0.49,95% CI:-0.44~0.91)方面差异无统计学意义,其获卵数(WMD=0.29,P=0.40,95% CI:-0.38~0.96)、受精率(WMD=4.39,P=0.21,95%CI:-2.41 ~ 11.18)、临床妊娠率(OR=1.72,P=0.38,95% CI:0.52 ~5.71)较对照组稍升高,但差异均无统计学意义.结论 GnRH-a联合GnRH-ant超短方案对卵巢低反应患者的疗效与对照组促排卵方案比较无明显差异,且在获卵数、受精率、临床妊娠率上稍优于其他促排卵方案.

关 键 词:GnRH-a  GnRH-ant  超短方案  卵巢低反应  体外受精胚胎移植  卵胞浆内单精子注射  Meta分析  GnRH-agonist  GnRH-antagonist  ultrashort flare  poor ovarian response  in vitro fertilisation  intracytoplasmic sperm injection  meta-analysis

Effectiveness of ultrashort flare GnRH-agonist combined with GnRH-antagonist protocol in women with poor ovarian response: a meta-analysis
LIU Xiru,BAN Yanna,FU Huijia. Effectiveness of ultrashort flare GnRH-agonist combined with GnRH-antagonist protocol in women with poor ovarian response: a meta-analysis[J]. Acta Academiae Medicinae Militaris Tertiae, 2018, 0(4): 350-355. DOI: 10.16016/j.1000-5404.201710039
Authors:LIU Xiru  BAN Yanna  FU Huijia
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effect of ultrashort flare GnRH-agonist combined with GnRH-antagonist protocol in women with poor ovarian response.Methods We searched MEDLINE,EMBASE,the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL),the Chinese Biomedicine (CBM) Database,and Wanfang Database for eligible studies published by the end of July,2017.Two independent evaluators screened the randomized controlled trials and clinical controlled trails retrieved that compared the effects of ultrashort flare GnRH-agonist combined with GnRH-antagonist protocol with the control protocol in women with poor ovarian response.The quality of the included studies was assessed and data were extracted for meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3.Results Six studies with a total of 336 cycles were included in the final analysis.No significant differences were found between ultrashort flare GnRH-agonist combined with GnRH-antagonist protocol group and the control group in the number of gonadotropin ampules (WMD =6.32,P =0.09,95% CI:-0.92 ~ 13.55),length of stimulation (WMD =0.38,P =0.07,95% CI:-0.04 ~0.81) or the number of embryos transferred (WMD =0.24,P =0.49,95% CI:-0.44 ~ 0.91).Ultrashort flare GnRH-agonist combined with GnRH-antagonist protocol resulted in a greater number of oocytes retrieved (WMD =0.29,P =0.40,95% CI:-0.38 ~ 0.96) and higher fertilization rate (WMD =4.39,P =0.21,95% CI:-2.41 ~ 11.18) and clinical pregnancy rate (OR =1.72,P =0.38,95% CI:0.52 ~ 5.71) than the control protocol,but the differences were not statistically significant.Conclusion The currently available evidence suggests that ultrashort flare GnRH-agonist combined with GnRH-antagonist protocol is not inferior to other controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols,but this conclusion still awaits further verification by largescale randomised controlled trials.
Keywords:
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号