| 预应力混凝土管桩两种施工方法的特点比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 龚模松. 预应力混凝土管桩两种施工方法的特点比较[J]. 工业建筑, 2011, 0(Z1) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 龚模松 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华南理工大学建筑设计研究院; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 预应力管桩有捶击沉桩和静压沉桩两种施工方法,其各自存在优缺点及适应性,对结构设计师和土建建造师正确了解其特性和正确选用施工方法具有重要意义。
|
| 关 键 词： | 预应力管桩 捶击沉桩 静压沉桩 |
THE COMPARISON OF TWO CONSTRUCTION METHODS OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE TUBE PILES |
| |
| Gong Mosong. THE COMPARISON OF TWO CONSTRUCTION METHODS OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE TUBE PILES[J]. Industrial Construction, 2011, 0(Z1) |
| |
| Authors: | Gong Mosong |
| |
| Affiliation: | Gong Mosong(Architecture Design and Research Institute,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510641,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | There are two construction methods of prestressed concrete tube piles,one is hammer-driving method,another one is static pressure method,which have advantages and disadvantages of their adaptability;it is very important for structural designers and civil constructors to understand properly their characteristics and to choose the right construction method. |
| |
| Keywords: | prestressed concrete tube piles hammer-driving static pressure |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
