首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

SBR-电催化组合工艺处理己内酰胺废水试验研究
引用本文:杜松. SBR-电催化组合工艺处理己内酰胺废水试验研究[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2019, 9(4): 384-388. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.03.260
作者姓名:杜松
作者单位:1. 煤炭科学技术研究院有限公司,北京 100013;;2. 煤炭资源高效开采与洁净利用国家重点实验室,北京 100013;;3. 国家能源煤炭高效利用与节能减排技术装备重点实验室,北京 100013;;4. 哈尔滨工业大学(深圳)土木与环境工程学院,广东 深圳 518055
基金项目:天地科技股份有限公司科技创新创业资金专项
摘    要:通过小试试验研究芬顿法、序批式活性污泥(SBR)生化法和电催化氧化法对己内酰胺废水中有机物的去除效果;采用SBR-电催化组合工艺现场中试,研究其对己内酰胺废水中有机物的去除效果,分析其运行的稳定性与经济性。结果表明:芬顿法在氧化剂投加量为3.0%时,CODCr去除率可达90.0%,但氧化剂成本较高;SBR生化法在适宜能耗时对CODCr的去除率为56.1%,单一工艺难以达到处理要求;电催化氧化法在适宜能耗时对CODCr的去除率为43.5%,单一工艺难以达到处理要求且单位耗电量较大;SBR-电催化氧化组合工艺对CODCr的去除率超过90.0%,出水CODCr降至200~300 mg/L,废水处理成本降低至5.15元/m 3,技术与经济方面均可行。

关 键 词:己内酰胺废水   SBR生化法   电催化法   有机污染物   经济可行性
收稿时间:2018-09-19

Treatment of organic pollutants in caprolactam wastewater by SBR and electrocatalytic oxidation combined process
DU Song. Treatment of organic pollutants in caprolactam wastewater by SBR and electrocatalytic oxidation combined process[J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering Technology, 2019, 9(4): 384-388. doi: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.03.260
Authors:DU Song
Affiliation:1. China Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China;;2. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mining and Clean Utilization, Beijing 100013, China;;3. National Energy Technology & Equipment Laboratory of Coal Utilization and Emission Control, Beijing 100013, China;;4. School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
Abstract:The removal effect of organic compounds from caprolactam wastewater by Fenton process, SBR and electrocatalytic oxidation was studied, and the pilot of SBR plus electrocatalytic oxidation processes was set up to study the removal efficiency of organic compounds from caprolactam wastewater, the effect stability and the economy. The results showed that the CODCr removal rate by oxidant in Fenton process was 90.0% with the oxidant dosage of 3.0%, but the cost of oxidant was high. The removal rate of CODCr by SBR was 56.1%, and the single process was difficult to meet the processing requirements. The removal rate of CODCr by electrocatalytic oxidation was 43.5% at appropriate energy consumption, the single process was difficult to meet the processing requirements and the unit power consumption was high. The removal rate of CODCr by SBR plus electrocatalytic oxidation combined process was above 90.0% and the effluent CODCr was reduced to 200-300 mg/L, with the treatment cost of 5.15 yuan/m 3, indicating both technically and economically feasible.
Keywords:caprolactam wastewater  SBR  electrocatalytic oxidation  organic pollutants  economic feasibility
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境工程技术学报》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境工程技术学报》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号