首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

无孔隙度测井条件下储层孔隙度求取方法探讨
引用本文:王晓光,旷红伟,伍泽云,苏静.无孔隙度测井条件下储层孔隙度求取方法探讨[J].岩性油气藏,2008,20(3):99-103.
作者姓名:王晓光  旷红伟  伍泽云  苏静
作者单位:长江大学油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室
摘    要:针对缺乏孔隙度测井系列的井区, 利用标准测井资料, 通过“岩心刻度法”可建立起测井孔隙度解释模型, 常见的有采用自然电位减小系数和视电阻率建立的2 种孔隙度模型。通过利用泥质含量参数建立的孔隙度模型与这2 种模型的对比研究, 发现泥质含量孔隙度模型计算出的孔隙度与岩心分析孔隙度吻合程度更高, 其平均绝对误差为0.162, 平均相对误差为5.934%。因此认为: 在研究区, 利用泥质含量孔隙度测井解释模型计算储层孔隙度相对更精确, 从而实现利用标准测井资料分析评价储层及定量计算储层参数的目的, 为研究区在缺乏孔隙度测井资料条件下定量求取储层参数提供了一种可行的方法。

关 键 词:套管井  过套管  测井新技术  

Methods of calculating porosity without logging porosity data
WANG Xiao-guang,KUANG Hong-wei,WU Ze-yun,SU Jing.Methods of calculating porosity without logging porosity data[J].Northwest Oil & Gas Exploration,2008,20(3):99-103.
Authors:WANG Xiao-guang  KUANG Hong-wei  WU Ze-yun  SU Jing
Affiliation:Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources, Ministry of Education,Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434023, China
Abstract:Aiming at the well fields without logging porosity data, we can use type log data to establish porosity interpretation model through core scaling method. There are two common porosity models which are established by SP reduction factor and apparent resistivity. After comparing these two models with the model established by shale content parameters, we found that porosity calculated by shale content porosity model is relatively more coincided with the porosity that calculated by core analysis and its mean absolute deviation is 0.162, while the mean relative deviation is 5.934%. So it is believed that applying shale content porosity interpretation model to calculate reservoir porosity is relatively more accurate in the study area. Thereby, a feasible method is supplied to evaluate reservoir and quantitatively calculate reservoir parameters by using type log data.
Keywords:type log  porosity  shale content  SP reduction factor  apparent resistivity
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《岩性油气藏》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《岩性油气藏》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号