首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
     

米氮平与帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症对照研究
引用本文:刘文英,廖春平,高欢.米氮平与帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症对照研究[J].临床心身疾病杂志,2007,13(3):200-202.
作者姓名:刘文英  廖春平  高欢
作者单位:518020,广东·深圳,深圳市康宁医院
摘    要:目的评价米氮平与帕罗西汀治疗抑郁症的疗效与安全性。方法将64例抑郁症住院患者和门诊患者随机分为两组,分别给予米氮平和帕罗西汀治疗,疗程6w。于治疗前和治疗第1w、2w、4w、6w末采用汉密顿抑郁量表、汉密顿焦虑量表、临床疗效总评量表和副反应量表评定临床疗效和不良反应。结果两组治疗各时段汉密顿抑郁量表、汉密顿焦虑量表评分均显著下降;米氮平组显效时间较帕罗西汀组快,药物不良反应明显少于帕罗西汀组,且米氮平很少引起性功能障碍。结论米氮平是一种安全、有效的新一代抗抑郁药,依从性好,安全性高。

关 键 词:米氮平  帕罗西汀  抑郁症  汉密顿抑郁量表  临床疗效总评量表
文章编号:1672-187X(2007)03-0200-03
修稿时间:2007-02-15

A control study of mirtazapine vs. paroxetine in the treatment of depression
Liu Wenying,Liao Chunping,Gao Huan.A control study of mirtazapine vs. paroxetine in the treatment of depression[J].Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases,2007,13(3):200-202.
Authors:Liu Wenying  Liao Chunping  Gao Huan
Affiliation:Shenzhen Kangning Hospital ,Shenzhen 518020,Guangdong, China
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the curative effects and safety of mirtazapine vs.paroxetine in the treatment of depression.Methods 64 inpatients and outpatients with depression were randomly divided into mirtazapine and paroxetine groups(both n = 32)for 6 weeks.Curative effects were assessed with the Hamilton Depression Scale(HAMD),the Hamilton Anxiety Scale(HAMA)and the Clinical Global Impression(CGI),and side reactions with the Treatment Emergent Symptoms Scale(TESS)before treatment and at the ends of the 1st,2nd,4th and 6th week treatment.Results At each chron-stage,scores of the HAMD and HAMA in both groups decreased significantly;mirtazapine took effects faster than did,its adverse reactions were fewer than the paroxetine's and it seldom caused sexual disturbance.Conclusion Mirtazapine is an effective and safe neo-antidepressant,and has better compliance and higher safety.
Keywords:Mirtazapine  paroxetine  depression  the HAMD  the CGI
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号-23

京公网安备 11010802026262号